Skip to main content

Culture: Contexts of Ethical Leadership

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Biblical Theology for Ethical Leadership

Part of the book series: Christian Faith Perspectives in Leadership and Business ((CFPLB))

  • 886 Accesses

Abstract

Ethical leadership is not divorced from contexts. Instead, the anchors of creation and eschatology help to provide lenses for appropriate use and modification of leadership models in given contexts. 1 Timothy is analysed as a document that contextualizes and appropriates leadership models from wider Greco-Roman culture for Christian, therefore ethical leadership. Revelation is also studied for its implications on political leadership and the use of power efficiently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In popular leadership literature, Patrick Lencioni is unparalleled in his ability to describe the importance of communication in entertaining ways. Especially recommended are Death by Meeting (2004) and The Advantage (2012).

  2. 2.

    Private ownership is already a kind of fiction—a very useful one—but not one that can be completely enforced. “A landowner can exclude the public from his land, but cannot…exclude his land from the public. His field is everyone else’s scenery; his factory is everyone else’s civic building” (O’Donovan and O’Donovan 2004, 305).

  3. 3.

    I believe I am indebted to my colleague Dr. Patrick Eby and his wife Ruth for this phrase.

  4. 4.

    See, e.g., Mark 3:20–35 and Luke 2:41–52.

  5. 5.

    Ramachandra (2008) writes, “But every personal religious conversion implies also a reorientation of political loyalties” (63). We will explore this more fully below under the church .

  6. 6.

    While I am keeping this in the framework of Jesus , I am leaning explicitly on Volf’s (1996) differentiation . He writes, “The children of Abraham are not strangers pure and simple, however. Their ‘strangeness’ results not from the negative act of cutting all ties, but from the positive act of giving allegiance to God and God ’s promises future ” (53).

  7. 7.

    Space precludes a full unpacking of this theology , but a start might be to see the intimate relationship between the Father and the Son in Matthew 11, followed up with Jesus ’ promise of rest for the weary (Matthew 11:28–30), which is reminiscent of Isaiah 40:29–31 and the work of God .

  8. 8.

    Space precludes a considerable discussion of this topic now, but I suggest the following to get a sense of what some mean by culture and how Christians engage with it. Andy Crouch, Culture Making: Recovering Our Creative Calling (2008), Stanley Hauerwas and Will Willimon, Resident Aliens (1989), James K.A. Smith, Desiring the Kingdom: Worship, Worldview, and Cultural Formation (2009). The preceding is quite limited—and limited culturally in that I haven’t explored multiple cultures. Because “culture ” is better understood as “cultures,” then you will want to be sensitive to your own cultures and others to get a varied sense of how different cultures understand the dynamic between culture and Christian faith in their culture .

  9. 9.

    For a very helpful discussion of religious faith and culture that pushes beyond the sketch I can offer here, see Timothy C. Tennent, Theology in the Context of World Christianity (2007), especially Chapter 8, “Ecclesiology : Followers of Jesus in Islamic Mosques.”

  10. 10.

    To put this in ecclesiological language—the language of the church : “[M]odels of the church must not be dictated by cultural reality , but they must be voiced and practiced in ways that take careful account of the particular time and circumstance into which God ’s people are called” (Brueggemann 1991, 128).

  11. 11.

    Oliver O’Donovan uses the phrase “eschatological sign” of the tribe of Levi (O’Donovan and O’Donovan 2004, 309), which I will develop below.

  12. 12.

    “To talk of the provisionality of the church , therefore, does not suggest that its faith is relativistic, but rather that its faith is large enough to be made relevant to any time and place” (Britton 2009, 100). Britton goes on to describe the importance of asking questions. One of the best roles that allegiance to God can take is asking gentle, but informed questions of cultures. Leadership involves asking questions, not from ignorance, but in humility, seeking the others answer genuinely, but critically. I quickly follow up with an affirmation of Christian leadership : The “significance of Christian leadership is that it contains enough truth to make it relevant in any context and yet enough flexibility to use the inherent truths to build upon any context” (Huizing 2011, 69).

  13. 13.

    Beeley (2009) points out how the church can make sense of its more explicitly religious and saving work : “The divine economy includes all of God ’s dealings with creation , including the world of creation , redemption, and consummation. It is not, therefore, merely an economy of salvation, even if our present condition requires salvation in order to experience the fullness of our creation and final knowledge of God ” (Beeley 2009, 20, n. 19). The liturgy of the church is meant to orient the church to God in order to see the world and God ’s work in the world rightly in that local church ’s place: “True theological leadership …involves a disciplined and thoughtful reflectivity about how we are to minister God ’s word and sacraments in the unique particularities of each time and place” (Beeley and Britton 2009, 7).

  14. 14.

    This is why the local church is so important, because it gives real people outside our limited and immediate culture (s), like family and work , to serve and by whom to be served in what Scharen (2015) calls the “daily realities of the actual church in the real world in all its beauty and brokenness” (14).

  15. 15.

    Volf (1996) writes, “But the solution for being a stranger in a wrong way is not full naturalization, but being a stranger in the right way” (39–40).

  16. 16.

    Unless otherwise noted, all references in this section are to 1 Timothy.

  17. 17.

    Some scholarship over the last two hundred years, following New Testament scholar F.C. Baur, has emphasized that 1 Timothy was not written by Paul, as traditionally believed, and instead was a second-century forgery, pointing to a change in vocabulary and style and the developed church organization, among other reasons. Others have suggested that Paul’s use of a secretary, the function of a co-sender, and the presence of non-Pauline quotations in Paul’s letters may all change this perspective (Ellis 1993). I.H. Marshall (2005) noted, although did not argue, that a colleague of Paul’s, shortly after Paul’s death , could have been the author of these letters, carrying on the teaching of Paul faithfully. Regardless of author, the message of 1 Timothy may be examined for the purposes of extending the nature of ethical leadership .

  18. 18.

    Overseer is also translated bishop, elder, supervisor, superintendent, and administrator (Fitzmeyer 2004; Johnson 2001; Wall and Steele 2012).

  19. 19.

    I have left off the marital requirements because these requirements are not necessarily for all times and places and are for the context of the church , which I want to broaden. My own opinion is that this requirement for marriage lends to the kind of person the leader is meant to be and not a requirement for all persons at all times. For an approach to this text and the Bible as a whole, see Schenck (2016). I also want to point out that women and men had similar expectations for moral propriety in this letter (compare 2:9, 15 for women with 3:2 for men). I also want to note that the word translated “authority ,” when Paul disallows women having authority over a man (2:12), is used only once in the New Testament (Davis 2009), whereas it is used elsewhere in nonbiblical literature both contemporary with and prior to 1 Timothy. In this literature, authenteo had such meanings as “to domineer,” “to murder,” or “to commit a crime.” Only through later generations after the biblical text was written “did the meaning ‘to exercise authority ’ come to predominate” (Davis 2009, 5) the meaning of the word. It is also important to note that had Paul had ecclesial authority in mind, other words were available, such as proestemi (to govern or administer [Johnson 2001]; Davis 2009). Instead, Paul used a word with negative sense in the outside world.

  20. 20.

    Deacon is also translated as servant (Wall and Steele 2012) and helper (Johnson 2001).

  21. 21.

    Wall and Steele (2012) describe these leaders as having “moral integrity…as the complement of orthodox commitment” (109). There is a connection between their belief of the news of Jesus and their obedience to Jesus ’ teaching and its implications (Saarinen 2008; Stott 1998; Young 1994).

  22. 22.

    I direct interested readers to the various commentaries that I have referenced in this chapter for these ancient sources that follow. While I have confirmed the connections in English translations, these insights emerge from and are reaffirmed by various commentaries cited throughout this section.

  23. 23.

    The following is slightly modified from “Politics from the Underside: Christians in the Political Realm in Revelation” (2006). For more on Revelation as politics , see also Aaron Perry (2007), “On Enduring Political Authority : Comparing Oliver O’Donovan and the Book of Revelation.”

  24. 24.

    “The faith of the New Testament acknowledges not the revolutionary but the martyr who recognizes both the authority of the state and also its limits. His resistance consists in doing everything that serves to promote law and an ordered life in society, even when this means obeying authorities who are indifferent or hostile to his faith ; but he will not obey when he is commanded to do evil, that is, to oppose the will of God . His is not the resistance of active force, but the resistance of the one who is willing to suffer for the will of God ” (Benedict XVI 2006, 21).

  25. 25.

    John also says that the destroying locusts wear stephanoi (9:7). Here, John has linked the locusts with a later portrait of Jesus in order to contrast them: First, Jesus , “one like a son of man ,” wears a stephanos of gold when reaping his harvest (14:14) while the locusts wear “something like stephanoi of gold” (emphasis added). Second, consider the nature of the pictures. In one picture, there is a reaper of harvest, while in the other there are destroyers of crops. John’s purpose here is contrast, not comparison.

  26. 26.

    The Christian development of what has been called “Just War Theory” is a practical application of this tension—using power in search of peace in ways that are faithful.

  27. 27.

    Ramachandra (2008) writes, “The opposite of secular is not the spiritual or the sacred, but the eternal. The saeculum denotes the temporal order that, while incapable of itself to deliver the kingdom of God , is hallowed by creation and incarnation, and called to anticipate God ’s reign in the ordering of human life. It represents a realm in which submission to human authorities, even those that do not explicitly acknowledge the sovereignty of God , is valid but always conditional” (63).

  28. 28.

    See Carl R. Trueman (2016) for a winsome description of aesthetics and argument, from where I am drawing part of this final reflection.

  29. 29.

    This isn’t to deny that outward appearance influences whom we see as potential leaders. Malcolm Gladwell (2005), in typical entertaining fashion, tells the story of President Warren Harding who had a presidential look, but ultimately did not have a highly regarded period of service before dying in office.

  30. 30.

    See The Aesthetics of Organization, edited by Stephen Linstead and Heather Höpfl, especially Chapter 1. Gordon T. Smith (2017) puts beauty in his chapter on creating space (169–170), which reminds readers that everything communicates—the good creation can be enhanced from within to point to the perfecting future coming from God .

References

  • Bauckham, Richard. 1993. New Testament Theology: The Theology of the Book of Revelation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeley, Christopher A. 2009. “Theology and Pastoral Leadership.” Anglican Theological Review 91 (1): 11–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeley, Christopher A., and Joseph H. Britton. 2009. “Introduction: Toward a Theology of Leadership.” Anglican Theological Review 91 (1): 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict XVI. 2006. Values in a Time of Upheaval. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branson, Marc L., and Juan F. Martinez. 2011. Churches, Cultures & Leadership: A Practical Theology of Congregations and Ethnicities. Downers Grove, IL: IVP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, Joseph. 2009. “Something to Say: Pastoral Leadership and the Word.” Anglican Theological Review 91 (1): 93–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueggemann, Walter. 1991. “Rethinking Church Models Through Scripture.” Theology Today 48 (2): 128–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caird, George B. 1966. The Revelation of St. John the Divine. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, Andy. 2008. Culture Making: Recovering Our Creative Calling. Downers Grove, IL: IVP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, John J. 2009. “First Timothy 2:12, the Ordination of Women, and Paul’s Use of Creation Narratives.” Priscilla Papers 23 (2): 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Villiers, Pieter G.R. 2006. “Heroes at Home: Identity, Ethos, and Ethics in 1 Timothy Within the Context of the Pastoral Epistles.” In Identity, Ethics, and Ethos in the New Testament, edited by Jan G. van der Watt, 357–386. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, David J. 2011. “1–2 Timothy.” In Dictionary of Scripture and Ethics, edited by Joel Green, 782–783. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, E. Earl. 1993. “Pastoral Letters.” In Dictionary of Paul and His Letters, edited by Gerald F. Hawthorne, Ralph P. Martin, and Daniel G. Reid, 658–666. Grand Rapids, MI: IVP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epictetus. (n.d.). Discourses. http://classics.mit.edu/Epictetus/discourses.3.three.html.

  • Fitzmyer, Joseph A. 2004. “The Structured Ministry of the Church in the Pastoral Epistles.” The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 66 (4): 582–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, Malcolm. 2005. Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking. New York, NY: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauerwas, Stanley, and Will Willimon. 1989. Resident Aliens. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoehl, Stacey E. 2011. “The Mentor Relationship: An Exploration of Paul as Loving Mentor to Timothy and the Application of This Relationship to Contemporary Leadership Challenges.” Journal of Biblical Perspectives in Leadership 3 (2): 32–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horrell, David. 1997. “Leadership Patterns and the Development of Ideology in Early Christianity.” Sociology of Religion 58 (4): 323–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huizing, Russell. 2011. “Bringing Christ to the Table of Leadership: Moving Towards a Theology of Leadership.” Journal of Applied Christian Leadership 5 (2): 58–75. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/jacl/vol5/iss2/5.

  • Isocrates. (n.d.). To Democritus. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0144%3Aspeech%3D1%3Asection%3D35.

  • Johnson, Luke T. 2001. The First and Second Letters to Timothy. New York, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lencioni, Patrick. 2004. Death by Meeting: A Leadership Fable About Solving the Most Painful Problem in Business. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lencioni, Patrick. 2012. The Advantage: Why Organizational Health Trumps Everything Else in Business. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linstead, Stephen, and Heather Höpfl, eds. 2000. The Aesthetics of Organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, Ernest C. 1999–2010. “The XXX Canons of the Holy and Fourth Synods, of Chalcedon.” The Common Man’s Perspective. Accessed January 2, 2017. http://ecmarsh.com/fathers/npnf2/NPNF2-14/Npnf2-14-105.htm.

  • Marshall, I. Howard. 2005. “Book of 1 Timothy.” In Dictionary for Theological Interpretation of the Bible, edited by Kevin Vanhoozer, 801–804. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migliore, Daniel. 2014. Faith Seeking Understanding: An Introduction to Christian Theology, 3rd edition. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donovan, Oliver. 1999. Desire of the Nations: Rediscovering the Roots of Political Theology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donovan, Oliver. 2007. “What Kind of Community is the Church?” Ecclesiology 3 (1): 171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donovan, Oliver. 2014. Finding and Seeking: Ethics as Theology, Volume 2. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donovan, Oliver, and Joan Lockwood O’Donovan. 2004. Bonds of Imperfection: Christian Politics, Past and Present. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onasander. (n.d.). The General. http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Onasander/A*.html.

  • Perry, Aaron. 2006. “Politics from the Underside: Christians in the Political Realm in Revelation.” Imitatio Christi, May 2. http://imitatiochristi.blogs.com/imitatio_christi/2006/05/politics_from_t.html.

  • Perry, Aaron. 2007. “On Enduring Political Authority: Comparing Oliver O’Donovan and the Book of Revelation.” Journal for Christian Theological Research 12: 37–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, Aaron. 2016. “Exemplary Lives in Speech, Conduct, Love, Faith, and Purity: An Analysis of 1 Timothy 3–4 for Ethical Leadership.” PhD diss., Regent University. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1757729770.

  • Ramachandra, Vinoth. 2008. Subverting Global Myths: Theology and the Public Issues that Shape Our World. London, UK: SPCK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raschke, Carl. 2008. GloboChrist: The Great Commission Takes a Postmodern Turn. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruden, Sarah. 2010. Paul Among the People: The Apostle Reinterpreted and Reimagined in His Own Time. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saarinen, Risto. 2008. The Pastoral Epistles with Philemon & Jude. Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharen, Christian. 2015. Fieldwork in Theology: Exploring the Social Context of God’s Work in the World. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenck, Ken. 2016. “Women in Ministry: The ‘Problem Texts’.” In Leadership the Wesleyan Way: An Anthology Forming Leaders in Wesleyan Thought and Practice, edited by Aaron Perry and Bryan Easley, 119–130. Lexington, KY: Emeth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Gordon T. 2017. Institutional Intelligence: How to Build an Effective Organization. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, James K.A. 2009. Desiring the Kingdom: Worship, Worldview, and Cultural Formation. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Aida B. 2013. 1 Timothy: A New Covenant Commentary. Eugene, OR: Cascade.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stott, John R.W. 1998. 1 Timothy and Titus: Fighting the Good Fight: 12 Studies with Commentary for Individuals or Groups. Downers Grove, IL: IVP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennent, Timothy C. 2007. Theology in the Context of World Christianity. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trueman, Carl R. 2016. “We Need to Win the Aesthetic, Not the Argument.” First Things, October 12. https://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2016/10/we-need-to-win-the-aesthetic-not-the-argument.

  • Volf, Miroslav. 1996. Exclusion and Embrace: A Theological Exploration of Identity, Otherness, and Reconciliation. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, Robert W., and Richard B. Steele. 2012. 1 and 2 Timothy and Titus. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witherington III, Ben. 2006. Letters and Homilies for Hellenized Christians, Volume 1: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary on Titus, 1–2 Timothy and 1–3 John. Grand Rapids, MI: IVP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Frances. 1994. Theology of the Pastoral Letters. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aaron Perry .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Perry, A. (2018). Culture: Contexts of Ethical Leadership. In: Biblical Theology for Ethical Leadership. Christian Faith Perspectives in Leadership and Business. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75043-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics