Skip to main content

A Practical Tool for the Evaluation of Contrast

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Breaking Down Barriers (CWUAAT 2018)

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1695 Accesses

Abstract

The provision of suitable contrast in the built environment not only contributes to a better accessibility and safety, but also improves wayfinding in buildings for all users, when applied well. Many standards on accessibility require a level of contrast for better visibility of different critical elements, such as signage, differences in floor level or the indication of treads on stairs or localisation of obstacles (furniture and sanitary fittingsā€¦). Standard descriptions are available illustrating how the contrast should be realised and where it should be provided. Unfortunately, many of these standards are difficult to put in practice and contain much other information besides the contrast requirement. This chapter describes the development of a tool, focussing on visual contrast and its use in the built environment. The tool has been developed to be easy to use by any building professionals and helps providing good contrasts in different particular situations which are integrated into the tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Australian Standard (2001) 1428-1: Design for access and mobility, general requirements for access, new building works. Standards Australia, Sydney

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • BSI (2008) BS 8493ā€”Light reflectance value (LRV) of a surfaceā€”method of test. British Standard Institution, London, UK

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • BSI (2009) BS 8300ā€”Design of buildings and their approaches to meet the needs of disabled peopleā€”code of practice. British Standard Institution, London, UK

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bureau voor Normalisatie (2011) NBN EN 12665ā€”Light and lightingā€”basic terms and criteria for specifying lighting requirements, p 53

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • CIE (2011) CIE 196ā€”Guide to increasing accessibility in light and lightingā€”vision data and design considerations for better visibility and lighting for older people and people with disabilities. International Commission on Illummination, Vienna, Austria

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • CISSS (2017) Institut Nazareth and Louis Braille. http://www.inlb.qc.ca/grand-public/accessibilite-et-adaptation/amenagements-des-lieux/. Accessed 10 Mar 2017

  • Danschutter S, Dā€™Herdt P, Deneyer A (2010) Eclairage et contraste pour les personnes malvoyantes, vol 3, no 12. WTCB-Dossier, Brussels, Belgium, pp 1ā€“5

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • DIN (2012) DIN 32975ā€”Gestaltung visueller Informationen im ƶffentlichen Raum zur barrierefreien Nutzung. Beuth Verlag, Berlin

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • ISO (2011) ISO 21542ā€”Accessibility and usability of the built environment. International Organization for Standardization, Switzerland

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Lenoir M, Den Brinker B, Kestelyn P, Leroy B, Jonia I, Walraedt S et al (2010) New standard for the visual accessibility of signs and signage for people with low vision. ANEC report, ANEC-DFA-2008-G-044-Annex 6rev

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Sagawa K, Kurakata K (2013) Estimation of legible font size for elderly peopleā€”accessible design of characters in signs and displays and its standardization. Synthesiology 6(1):34ā€“44

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • United States Sign Council Foundation (2017) www.usscfoundation.org. Accessed 17 Nov 2017

  • Van de Perre L, Hanselaer P, Scheir GH, Smet K, Ryckaert WR (2016) Contrast metrics evaluation. In: Proceedings of CIE 2016, Melbourne, Australia, 3ā€“5 Mar 2016, pp 70ā€“78

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Danschutter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Danschutter, S., Deroisy, B. (2018). A Practical Tool for the Evaluation of Contrast. In: Langdon, P., Lazar, J., Heylighen, A., Dong, H. (eds) Breaking Down Barriers. CWUAAT 2018. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75028-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75028-6_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75027-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75028-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics