Psychodynamically Informed Clinical Practice for Non-Psychotherapists

  • Alan Eppel
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter describes the application of short-term psychodynamic principles in general to work in medicine, psychology, social work and related disciplines. It is argued that a basic understanding of dynamic principles can enhance the functioning of healthcare providers. Not all mental health professionals have the opportunity to undertake systematic psychotherapy. Nevertheless they can benefit from understanding the concepts presented in this book. The ability to identify emotional cues, to understand relational patterns and to be aware of defences, transference and countertransference can enhance a clinician’s diagnostic and treatment performance. This knowledge and awareness can be an antidote to the objectification of patients,  and the avoidance of emotions.The use of STPP principles can lead to more authentic encounters with patients.

Keywords

Primary care Therapeutic relationships Defences Transference Countertransference Communication skills 

References

  1. 1.
    Krupnick JL, Sotsky SM, Simmens S, Moyer J, Elkin I, Watkins J, Pilkonis PA. The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy outcome: findings in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996;64(3):532–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Meyer B, Pilkonis PA, Krupnick JL, Egan MK, Simmens SJ, Sotsky SM. Treatment expectancies, patient alliance, and outcome: further analyses from the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002;70(4):1051–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Maunder RG, Hunter JJ. Can patients be ‘attached’ to healthcare providers? An observational study to measure attachment phenomena in patient-provider relationships. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e011068.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011068.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Maunder RG, Panzerb A, Viljoenc M, Owenc J, Humanc S, Hunterd JJ. Physicians’ difficulty with emergency department patients is related to patients’ attachment style. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63(2):552–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ciechanowski PS, Katon WJ, Russo JE, Walker EA. The patient provider relationship: attachment theory and adherence to treatment in diabetes. Am J Psychiatr. 2001;158:29–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ciechanowski PS, Russo JE, Katon WJ, Korff MV, Simon GE, Lin EH, et al. The association of patient relationship style and outcomes in collaborative care treatment for depression in patients with diabetes. Med Care. 2006;44:283–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kidd T, Poole L, Elizabeth Leigh E, Ronaldson A, Jahangiri M, Steptoe A. Attachment anxiety predicts IL-6 and length of hospital stay in coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) patients. J Psychosom Res. 2014;77(2):155–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tutter A. J Am Psychoanalytic Assoc. 2006 Summer;54(3):781–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hahn RA. The nocebo phenomenon: concept, evidence, and implications for public health. Prev Med. 1997;26:607–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Balint M. The doctor, his patient and the illness. London: Pitman Med; 1957.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Winnicott D. Therapeutic consultations in child psychiatry. London: Hogarth Press; 1971.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Main TF. Traditional psychiatric defences against close encounter with patients. Can Psychiatr Assoc J. 1977;22:457–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maltsberger JT, Buie DH. Countertransference hate in the treatment of suicidal patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1974;30(5):625–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan Eppel
    • 1
  1. 1.McMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations