This chapter describes how therapists decide which interventions to make at any point during a therapy session. Therapists’ choice of interventions is governed by both System 1 and System 2 decision-making processes. The range of interventions used in psychodynamic psychotherapy is described. Six of the main psychodynamic change factors are discussed: promoting the therapeutic alliance, the use of relational interventions, transference, rupture and repair, exploration and expression of emotion and the use of a relational focus.
Empirical evidence for the relationship between each of these variables and outcome is reviewed. There is some good evidence to support the use of these interventions with modest effect sizes.
Lewis Tauber’s ideas are expanded to include these key processes. Based on the current review, the interventions are grouped into three sets on a priority basis. These priorities will help guide therapists in the selection of the appropriate intervention at any moment in a therapy session.
An examination of the use of humour in psychotherapy is also included. Humour is one of the taken for granted dimensions in the exchange between therapist and patient. It is a complex interaction that impacts on the therapeutic alliance.
Systems 1 and 2 Process research Decision theory Therapeutic alliance Transference
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Tauber L. Choice point analysis-formulation, strategy, intervention, and result in group process therapy and supervision. Int J Group Psychother. 1978;28:163–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Kahneman D. Thinking fast and slow. Toronto: Anchor Canada; 2013.Google Scholar
Metcalfe J, Mischel W. A hot/cool system analysis of delay of gratification: dynamics of willpower. Psychol Rev. 1999;106:3–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Norman G, Sherbino J, Kelly D, Wood T, Young M, Gaissmaier W, Kreuger S, Monteiro S. The etiology of diagnostic errors: a controlled trial of system 1 versus system 2 reasoning. Acad Med. 2014;89:277–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Gabbard G. Psychodynamic psychiatry in clinical practice. 5th ed. Washington, DC: APPI; 2014.Google Scholar
Davanloo H. Short-term dynamic psychotherapy. New York: Jason Aronson; 1980.Google Scholar
Luborsky L. Principles of psychoanalytic psychotherapy: a manual for supportive-expressive treatment. New York: Basic Books; 1984.Google Scholar
Fosha D. The transforming power of affect: a model for accelerated change. New York: Basic Books; 2000.Google Scholar
McCullogh L, Kuhn N, Andrews S, et al. Treating Affect Phobia a manual for short term dynamic psychotherapy. New York: Guilford press; 2003.Google Scholar
Abbass A. Reaching through resistance: advanced psychotherapy techniques. Kansas City: Seven Leaves; 2015.Google Scholar
Leichsenring F, Ablon S, Barber JP, et al. Developing a prototype for short-term psychodynamic (supportive-expressive) therapy: an empirical study with the psychotherapy process Q-set. Psychother Res. 2016;26(4):500–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Horvath AO, Del Re AC, Flückiger C, Symonds D. Alliance in individual psychotherapy. In: Norcross JC, editor. Psychotherapy Relationships that Work. Chapter 2. Oxford University Press; 2011.Google Scholar
Diener MJ, Hilsenroth MJ, Weinberger J. Therapist affect focus and patient outcomes in psychodynamic psychotherapy: a meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164:936–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Ablon JS, Levy RA, Katzenstein T. Beyond brand names of psychotherapy: identifying empirically supported change processes. Psychother Theory Res Pract Train. 2006;43:216–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher H, Atzil-Slonim D, Bar-Kalifa E, Rafaeli E, Peri T. Emotional experience and alliance contribute to therapeutic change in psychodynamic therapy. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2016;53(1):105–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy KS, Keefe JR, Barber JP. Goldilocks on the couch: moderate levels of psychodynamic and process-experiential technique predict outcome in psychodynamic therapy. Psychother Res. 2016;26:307–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Marziali EA. Prediction of outcome of brief psychotherapy from therapist interpretive interventions. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1984;41:301–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Høglend P, Hersoug AG, Kjell-Petter B, et al. Effects of transference work in the context of therapeutic alliance and quality of object relations. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011;79(5):697–706.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Barber J, Crits-Christoph P, Luborsky L. Effects of therapist adherence and competence on patient outcome in brief dynamic therapy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996;64(3):619–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar