Advertisement

The Xenopus laevis Invasion in Portugal: An Improbable Connection of Science, Mediterranean Climate and River Neglect

  • Mónica Sousa
  • Angela Maurício
  • Rui Rebelo
Chapter
Part of the Environmental History book series (ENVHIS, volume 8)

Abstract

The source populations of one of the most worldwide spread invasive amphibians—the African clawed frog, Xenopus laevis —inhabit the Mediterranean-type climate region of South Africa. Frogs captured here were exported to many world regions during the 20th century with scientific purposes. Soon after, established invasive populations were found in several places, the majority of them subject to Mediterranean-type climates. Here we reconstruct the historical contingencies that explain the transport, site of arrival, establishment, lag phase and expansion of this invasive frog in Portugal. Improbable events were associated with practically all stages of the invasion process. Individuals were probably brought to Portugal by a single researcher and their escape from her lab was facilitated by a disastrous flood. Despite the striking differences from native frogs, this species apparently lived undetected by biologists and authorities for more than 20 years in two streams in Lisbon metropolitan area, and the discovery of the invasive populations was only prompted by the beginning of stream restoration actions. Since 2010, this frog is being subject to a control and eradication program. We provide details on the progress of this program, as well as on the role that geographic and historical contingencies may have for its final success.

Keywords

Amphibian Laboratory escape Silent invasion Periurban Historical contingency Control program 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the funding of this study by BiodivERsA: “Invasive biology of Xenopus laevis in Europe: ecology, impact and predictive models” (BIODIVERSA/0001/2012). The authors would also like to thank Nicolau Ser, Francisco Moreira and Raquel Marques for their contributions to the field work. Alexandra Freitas provided constructive comments on the manuscript. Animals were captured under Permit from Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e das Florestas, I.P., within the scope of the ‘‘Plano de erradicação de Xenopus laevis nas ribeiras do Concelho de Oeiras.’’

References

  1. Amaral P, Rebelo R (2012) Diet of invasive clawed frog Xenopus laevis at Lage stream (Oeiras, W Portugal). Herpetological J 22:187–190Google Scholar
  2. Arano B, Llorente G, García-Paris M, Herrero P (1995) Species translocation menaces Iberian waterfrogs. Conserv Biol 9:196–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benito G, Machado MJ (2012) Floods in the Iberian Peninsula. In: Kundzewicz ZW (ed) Changes of flood risk in Europe, IAHS special publication, vol 10. IAHS Press, Wallingford, pp 372–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boix D, García-Berthou E, Gascón S, Benejam L, Tornés E, Sala J, Benito J, Munné A, Solà C, Sabater S (2010) Response of community structure to sustained drought in Mediterranean rivers. J Hydrol 383:135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Courant J, Thirion J-M, Guillon M, Grillet P, Grosselet O (2014) Le régime alimentaire de Xenopus laevis (Daudin, 1802) (Anura: Pipidae) introduit en France. B Soc Herpétol Fr 150:1–7Google Scholar
  6. Crayon J (2005) Species account: Xenopus laevis. In: Lannoo MJ (ed) Amphibian declines: the conservation status of United States species. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 522–525Google Scholar
  7. Crossland M (2000) Direct and indirect effects of the introduced toad Bufo marinus (Anura: Bufonidae) on populations of native anuran larvae in Australia. Ecography 23:283–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Busschere C, Courant J, Herrel A, Rebelo R, Rödder D, Measey GJ, Backeljau T (2016) Unequal contribution of native South African phylogeographic lineages to the invasion of the African clawed frog, Xenopus laevis, in Europe. PeerJ 4:e1659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eggert C, Fouquet A (2006) A preliminary biotelemetric study of a feral invasive Xenopus laevis population in France. Alytes 23:144–149Google Scholar
  10. Faraone FP, Lillo F, Giacalone G, Lo Valvo M (2008) The large invasive population of Xenopus laevis in Sicily, Italy. Amphibia-Reptilia 29:405–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferreira AC (2014) Estrutura etária e crescimento das populações invasoras da rã Xenopus laevis em Portugal: um estudo esqueletocronológico. Universidade de Évora, Tese de MestradoGoogle Scholar
  12. Flower SS (1936) Further notes on the duration of life in animals—II amphibians. Proc Zool Soc London 1936:369–394Google Scholar
  13. Fouquet A, Measey GJ (2006) Plotting the course of an African clawed frog invasion in Western France. Anim Biol 56:95–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Green SL, Felt S, Wilson S (2010) South African clawed frogs (Xenopus laevis) in Golden Gate Park, San Francisco. In: Proceedings 17th international conference on aquatic invasive species, San Diego, CA, USAGoogle Scholar
  15. Gurdon J (1996) Introductory comments: Xenopus as a laboratory animal. In: Tinsley RC, Kobel HR (eds) The biology of Xenopus. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3–6Google Scholar
  16. Gurdon J, Hopwood N (2000) The introduction of Xenopus laevis into developmental biology: of empire, pregnancy testing and ribosomal genes. Int J Dev Biol 44:43–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. INAG (2008) Manual para a avaliação biológica da qualidade da água em sistemas fluviais segundo a Diretiva Quadro da Água: Protocolo de amostragem e análise para os macroinvertebrados bentónicos. Ministério do Ambiente, Ordenamento do Território e do Desenvolvimento Regional. Instituto Nacional da Água, I.P., LisboaGoogle Scholar
  18. Jokumsen A, Weber R (1980) Hemoglobin-oxygen binding properties in the blood of Xenopus laevis, with special reference to the influences of estivation and of temperature and salinity acclimation. J Exp Biol 86:19–37Google Scholar
  19. Karr J (1999) Defining and measuring river health. Freshwater Biol 41:221–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Katsanevakis S, Dreiu I, Nunes AL, Sanchez SP, Crocetta F, Arianoutsou M, Bazos I, Christopoulou A, Curto G, Delipetrou P, Kokkoris Y, Panov VE, Rabitsch W, Roques A, Scalera R, Shirley SM, Tricarico E, Vannini A, Zenetos A, Zervou S, Zikos A, Cardoso AC (2015) European Alien Species Information Network (EASIN)—supporting European policies and scientific research. Manag Biol Invasions 6:147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kraus F (2009). Alien reptiles and amphibians. A scientific compendium and analysis. Drake, James A. (ed), Invading nature—Springer series in invasion ecology, vol 4. Springer Science + Business Media B.V., The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  22. Lillo F, Faraone FP, Lo Valvo M (2011) Can the introduction of Xenopus laevis affect native amphibian populations? Reduction of reproductive occurrence in presence of the invasive species. Biol Invasions 13:1533–1541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Llewelyn J, Schwarzkopf L, Alford R, Shine R (2009) Something different for dinner? Responses of a native Australian predator (the keelback snake) to an invasive prey species (the cane toad). Biol Invasions 12:1045–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lobos G, Jaksic FM (2005) The ongoing invasion of African clawed frogs (Xenopus laevis) in Chile: causes of concern. Biodivers Conserv 14:429–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lobos G, Measey GJ (2002) Invasive populations of Xenopus laevis (Daudin) in Chile. Herpetol J 12:163–168Google Scholar
  26. Marques RP (2016) Impactos tróficos da rã-de-unhas-africana Xenopus laevis na ribeira de Barcarena (Oeiras, Portugal). Mestrado em Biologia da Conservação. Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, LisboaGoogle Scholar
  27. McCoid MJ, Fritts TH (1980) Notes on the diet of a feral population of Xenopus laevis (Pipidae) in California. Southwest Nat 25:272–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McCoid MJ, Fritts TH (1989) Growth and fat body cycles in feral populations of the African clawed frog, Xenopus laevis (Pipidae), in California with comments on reproduction. Southwest Nat 34:499–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Measey GJ (1998) Diet of feral Xenopus laevis (Daudin) in South Wales, UK. J Zool 246:287–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Measey GJ (2016) Overland movement in African clawed frogs (Xenopus laevis): a systematic review. PeerJ 4:e2474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Measey GJ, Rödder D, Green SL, Kobayashi R, Lillo F, Lobos G, Rebelo R, Thirion J-M (2012) Ongoing invasions of the African clawed frog, Xenopus laevis: a global review. Biol Invasions 14:2255–2270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Measey GJ, Vimercati G, Villiers FA, Mokhatla MM, Davies SJ, Edwards S, Altwegg R (2015) Frog eat frog: exploring variables influencing anurophagy. PeerJ 3:e1204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Measey GJ, Vimercati G, Villiers FA, Mokhatla M, Davies SJ, Thorp CJ, Rebelo AD, Kumschick S (2016) A global assessment of alien amphibian impacts in a formal framework. Divers Distrib 22:970–981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Oliveira JM (coord.), Santos JM, Teixeira A, Ferreira MT, Pinheiro PJ, Geraldes A, Bochechas J (2007) Projeto Aquariport: Programa nacional de monitorização de recursos piscícolas e de avaliação da qualidade ecológica de rios. Direção-Geral dos Recursos Florestais. LisboaGoogle Scholar
  35. Pascual G, Llorente GA, Montori A, Richter-Boix A (2007) Primera localización de Xenopus laevis en libertad en España. Boletín de la Asociación Herpetológica Española 18:42–43Google Scholar
  36. Price SJ, Garner TWJ, Nichols RA, Balloux F, Ayres C, Mora-Cabello de Alba A, Bosch J (2014) Collapse of amphibian communities due to an introduced Ranavirus. Curr Biol 24:2586–2591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rebelo R, Amaral P, Bernardes M, Oliveira J, Pinheiro P, Leitão D (2010) Xenopus laevis (Daudin, 1802), a new exotic amphibian in Portugal. Biol Invasions 12:3383–3387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Richter-Boix A, Garriga N, Montori A, Franch M, San Sebastián O, Villero D, Llorente GA (2012) Effects of the non-native amphibian species Discoglossus pictus on the recipient amphibian community: niche overlap, competition and community organization. Biol Inv 15:799–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Robalo JI, Doadrio I, Valente A, Almada V (2007) Identification of ESUs in the Critically Endangered Portuguese minnow Chondrostoma lusitanicum Collares-Pereira 1980, based on a phylogeographical analysis. Conserv Genet 8:1225–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schoonbee HJ, Prinsloo JF, Nxiweni JG (1992) Observations on the feeding habits of larvae, juvenile and adult stages of the African clawed frog, Xenopus laevis, in impoundments in Transkei. Water SA 18:227Google Scholar
  41. Silva-Rocha I, Salvi D, Sillero N, Mateo JA, Carretero MA (2015) Snakes on the Balearic islands: an invasion tale with implications for native biodiversity conservation. PLoS ONE 10:1–18Google Scholar
  42. Soto-Azat C, Clarke BT, Poynton JC, Cunningham AA (2010) Widespread historical presence of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in African pipid frogs. Divers Distrib 16:126–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tinsley RC, Kobel HR (1996) The biology of Xenopus. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  44. Tinsley RC, McCoid MJ (1996) Feral population of Xenopus outside Africa. In: Tinsley RC, Kobel HR (eds) The biology of Xenopus. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 81–94Google Scholar
  45. Tinsley RC, Loumont C, Kobel HR (1996) Geographical distribution and ecology. In: Tinsley RC, Kobel HR (eds) The biology of Xenopus. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 33–39Google Scholar
  46. Tinsley RC, Stott LC, Viney ME, Mable BK, Tinsley MC (2015) Extinction of an introduced warm-climate alien species, Xenopus laevis, by extreme weather events. Biol Inv 17:3183–3195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Van Sittert L, Measey GJ (2016) Historical perspectives on global exports and research of African clawed frogs (Xenopus laevis). Trans R Soc S Afr 71:157–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Recursos Naturais e Conservação da NaturezaInstituto da Conservação da Natureza e das Florestas, IPLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Departamento de Ambiente e EquipamentoMunicípio de OeirasOeirasPortugal
  3. 3.Departamento de Biologia Animal & Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental ChangesFaculdade de Ciências da Universidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations