Scourge in the Mediterranean. Policies Against the Argentine Ant in the First Half of the 20th Century

Chapter
Part of the Environmental History book series (ENVHIS, volume 8)

Abstract

The Argentine ant ( Linepithema humilis ) is a Neotropical species from the Paraná River basin in central South America which has been spread unintentionally through human commerce from the nineteenth century onwards. It was soon recognised as an urban and plant pest and, more recently, as a threat to biodiversity in many of the places it has been introduced. This chapter analyses the causes of and motivations for controlling this species in Portugal, Spain, France and Italy in the first half of the twentieth century, describing and comparing legal and administrative measures among countries. Containment (in France), fight (in Italy) and eradication (in Portugal) were laid down in mandatory regulations dated from the 1920s, but none of these three aims were achieved. Despite a long history of control efforts, Argentine ants remain in Southern Europe and other invaded areas, where people still strive to control them.

Keywords

Argentine ant Regulations Southern Europe 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by FCT—the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [UID/HIS/04209/2013 and IF/00222/2013/CP1166/CT0001].

References

  1. Antbase. http://www.antbase.org. 21 July 2017
  2. Anon (1923) Aprés la Côte d’Azur, les fourmis d’Argentine menacent les jardins parisiens. Le Matin (23 August)Google Scholar
  3. Anon (1935) Medios modernos de lucha contra las hormigas. Hojas Divulgadoras (Ministerio de Agricultura) 23:14–16Google Scholar
  4. Bensaúde M, Neves M (1937) A Formiga Argentina. Métodos para a Combater. Ministério da Agricultura, Lisboa.Google Scholar
  5. Bernard A (1921) Fourmi d’Argentine—Arrété Préfectorale des Alpes-Maritimes (January 26)Google Scholar
  6. Berville L, Renucci M, Provost E (2012) Mise en place de protocoles de contrôle de la fourmi d’Argentine sur les îles de Port-Cros et de Porquerolles (Var, France). Sci Rep Port-Cros Natl Park 26:91–108Google Scholar
  7. Berville L, Renucci M, Vidal P, Provost E (2016) Peuplement myrmécologique et évaluation de l’invasion de Linepithema humile sur les îles de Marseille (Bouches-du-Rhône, France). La Terre et la Vie (Revue d’Ecologie) 71(3):278–287Google Scholar
  8. Boser CL, Hanna C, Faulkner KR, Cory C, Randall JM, Morrison SA (2014) Argentine ant management in conservation areas: results of a pilot study. Monogr W North Am Nat 7:518–530Google Scholar
  9. Brandt M, Van Wilgenburg E, Tsutsui ND (2009) Global-Scale analyses of chemical ecology and population genetics in the Argentine ant. Mol Ecol 18:997–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Calvino I (1991) The Argentine ant. The watcher and other stories. HBJ, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  11. Cañizo J (1958) Las hormigas. Hojas Divulgadoras (Ministério de Agricultura) 10:1–20Google Scholar
  12. Capron A (1920) Subvention à l’Association de défense contre les fourmis de Cannes, séance du 8 Octobre. Rapports et délibérations: 578. Conseil général des Alpes-Maritimes, NiceGoogle Scholar
  13. Carpintero S, Reyes-Lopez J, Reyna LA (2003) Impact of human dwellings on the distribution of the exotic Argentine ant: a case study in the Donana National Park, Spain. Biol Cons 115:279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Castonguay S (2010) Creating an agricultural world order: regional plant protection problems and international phytopathology, 1878–1939. Agric Hist 84(1):46–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Castro AR (1949) Las Hormigas. Servicio de Capacitacion y Propaganda, Ministério da Agricultura, MadridGoogle Scholar
  16. Chopard L (1921) La fourmi d’Argentine Iridomyrmex humilis var. arrogans Santschi dans le midi de la France. Annales des Épiphyties 7:237–65Google Scholar
  17. Choe DH, Vetter RS, Rust MK (2010) Development of virtual bait stations to control Argentine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in environmentally sensitive habitats. J Econ Entomol 103:1761–1769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cohen JS (1979) Fascism and agriculture in Italy: policies and consequences. Econ Hist Rev 32(1):70–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Coutinho MFP (1929) A formiga argentina Iridomyrmex humilis Mayr var. arrogans Santschi. Ministério da Agricultura, LisboaGoogle Scholar
  20. Delgado-Moreno L, Lin K, Veiga-Nascimento R, Gan J (2011) Occurrence and toxicity of three classes of insecticides in water and sediment in two southern California coastal watersheds. J Agric Food Chem 59:9448–9456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Estacion Central de Patologia Vegetal de Madrid (1926) Las plagas de los naranjales españoles. Informe presentado a la Conferencia Nacional Naranjera. Producción 120:263–265Google Scholar
  22. Florent P (1920) La fourmi d’Argentine. Journal d’agriculture pratique, de jardinage et d’économie domestique (Nouvelle Série) 34:172Google Scholar
  23. Font de Mora R (1927) Consultas. El Progreso agrícola y pecuario 1478, March 15:231–32Google Scholar
  24. Font de Mora R (1923) Sobre la presencia de la hormiga argentina (Iridomyrmex humilis Mayr) en Valencia. Boletin de la Real Sociedade de História Natural 23:77–78Google Scholar
  25. Gamelas J (1950) Relatório Geral da campanha de combate à formiga Argentina “Iridomyrmex humilis”. Brigada técnica da IV Região, Ministério da Economia, DGSAGoogle Scholar
  26. Garcia Mercet R (1921) La hormiga argentina de Oporto (Iridomyrmex humilis Mayr). Ass Esp Prop de las Ciencias VI:99–104Google Scholar
  27. Guy (1927) Fourmis d’Argentine. L’Ouest-Eclair, 27 AugustGoogle Scholar
  28. Hoffmann BD, Luque GM, Bellard C, Holmes ND, Donlan CJ (2016) Improving invasive ant eradication as a conservation tool: a review. Biol Cons 198:37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Howard LO (1930) A history of applied entomology (somewhat anecdotal). Smithsonian Institution, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  30. Lounsbury CP (1909) Appendix IV. Report of the government entomologist for the year 1908. Cape of Good Hope. Report of the Department of Agriculture 1908:55–70Google Scholar
  31. Lowe S, Browne M, Boudjelas S, De Poorter M (2000) 100 of the world’s worst invasive alien species a selection from the global invasive species database. The Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) of the Species Survival Commission (SSC) of the World Conservation Union (IUCN)Google Scholar
  32. Marchal P (1917) La fourmi d’Argentine (Iridomyrmex humilis Mayr). Bulletin de la Societé d’Etude et de Vulgarisation de Zoologie et d’Agriculture de Bordeaux 16:23–26Google Scholar
  33. Marchal P, Poitiers R (1920) La fourmi de l’Argentine. C.R.Ac.Agric VII:315–23Google Scholar
  34. Martins MN (1907a) A formiga-ladra (Iridomyrmex humilis Mayr). Broteria (Série de Vulgarização Scientífica) 6:111–19Google Scholar
  35. Martins MN (1907b) Une fourmi terrible envahissant l’Europe (Iridomyrmex humilis Mayr). Broteria (Série Zoológica) 6:101–2Google Scholar
  36. McNamara KR (1998) The currency of ideas: monetary politics in the European Union. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Measuring Worth—Relative worth comparators and data sets. Measuring Worth. https://www.measuringworth.com. 24 May 2016
  38. Neves M (n/d) Experiências efectuadas no Algarve durante o ano de 1932, sobre a eficácia e custo dos meios de combate à formiga Argentina. Ministério da Economia, DGSAGoogle Scholar
  39. Newell W, Barber TC (1913) The Argentine ant. US Department of Agriculture, Bureau of EntomologyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Obregón R, Reyes-López J (2016) Primera cita de la hormiga invasora Linepithema humile (Mayr, 1868) en el País Vasco (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Revista gaditana de Entomología 7(1):515–18Google Scholar
  41. Pais JM, Valadas de Lima AM, Baptista JF, Jesus MF, Gameiro MM (1976) O fascismo nos campos em Portugal: a campanha do trigo (1a parte). Análise Social XII(46):400–74Google Scholar
  42. Paoli G (1922a) Isolator, per difendere le piante contro la formiga dell’ Argentina. Redia XVGoogle Scholar
  43. Paoli G (1922b) Un modo di difendere le piante contro gli assalti della formica d’Argentina. La Costa Azzurra Agrícola—Floreale II (6)Google Scholar
  44. Paoli G (1923) La formica dell’ Argentina: descrizione, costumi, mezzi di lotta: istruzioni e decreti. La Costa Azzurra Agrícola—Floreale II (5 suppl)Google Scholar
  45. Perfetto di Trento (1926) Circolare Lotta contro la Formica Argentina. Bollettino Uficiale Prefettura di Trento (deciembre) 51425Google Scholar
  46. Queiroz AI, Alves D (2016a) People, transports and the spread of the Argentine ant in Europe, from c.1850 to present. CEM/Cultura, Espaço & Memória 7:37–62Google Scholar
  47. Queiroz AI, Alves D (2016b) Local responses to a global invasive species. Varying reasons for controlling the Argentine ant in the Madeira archipelago (1850–2014). e-J Portuguese Hist 14(2):72–92Google Scholar
  48. Randall JM, Faulkner KR, Boser C, Cory C, Power P, Vermeer LA, Lozier L, Morrison SA (2011) Argentine ants on Santa Cruz Island, California: conservation issues and management options. In: Veitch CR, Clout MN, Towns DR (eds) Island invasives: eradication and management, pp 108–13. IUCN, Gland, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  49. Rosas F (1991) Rafael Duque e a política agrária do Estado Novo (1934–44). Análise Social XXVI (112–113):771–790Google Scholar
  50. Russell J (2016) Invasive ants eradicated from Tiritiri Island. National Geographic Society (blogs), 24 May. http://voices.nationalgeographic.com/2016/05/24/invasive-ants-eradicated-from-tiritiri-island/. Accessed 21 July 2017
  51. Salagnac (1922) Les ravages de la foumi d’Argentine. Le Journal (Paris. 1892) (3 August)Google Scholar
  52. Saraiva T (2010) Fascist labscapes: geneticist, wheat and landscapes of fascism in Italy and Portugal. Hist Stud Nat Sci 40(4):457–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schlick-Steiner B, Steiner FM, Pautasso M (2008) Ants and people: a test of two mechanisms potentially responsible for the large-scale human population–biodiversity correlation for Formicidae in Europe. J Biogeogr 35:2195–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Senato della Republica Italiana (1948) Disegno di Legge: (Discussione e approvazione) Autorizzazione della spesa di lire 200 milioni peri il finanziamento della lotta contro la formica argentina e della spesa di lire 1,000,000 per assicurare il normale funzionamento dei servizi fìtopatologici, VIII Commisione (Agricoltura e alimentazione) Riunione del 7 Ottobre 1948, 37–41Google Scholar
  55. Seri L (1923) Instruzioni sulla lotta contra la Formica argentina e risultati ottenutti a Roma negli anni 1921-22-23. Boll. Menz de Inf e Not, R. St. Pat Veget- RomaGoogle Scholar
  56. Silva Dias JC (1953) Ensaios de combate à formiga Argentina em pomares de citrinos: Setúbal. Brigada Técnica da XIII Região. Ministério da Economia, Repartição dos Serviços FitopatológicosGoogle Scholar
  57. Suarez AV, Holway DA, Case TJ (2001) Patterns of spread in biological invasions dominated by long-distance jump dispersal: insights from Argentine ants. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98:1095–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Titus ESG (1905) Report on the “New Orleans” ant (Iridomyrmex humilis Mayr). US Bur Entomol Bull 52:79–84Google Scholar
  59. Uekoetter F (2006) The green and the brown. A History of Conservation in Nazi Germany. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vayssière P (1922) La présence de la Fourmi d’ Argentine en France. Revue scientifique 34:128–130Google Scholar
  61. Vogel V, Pedersen JS, Giraud T, Krieger MJB, Keller L (2010) The worldwide expansion of the Argentine ant: global expansion of the Argentine ant. Divers Distrib 16(1):170–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ward DF, Anderson DP, Barron MC (2006) Using spatially explicit surveillance models to provide confidence in the eradication of an invasive ant. Scientific Reports 6Google Scholar
  63. Welzel KF, Choe DH (2016) Development of a pheromone-assisted baiting technique for Argentine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Econ Entomol 1–7Google Scholar
  64. Wetterer JK, Wild AL, Suarez AV, Roura-Pascual N, Espadaler X (2009) Worldwide spread of the Argentine ant, Linepithema Humile (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News 12:187–194Google Scholar
  65. Woodworth CW (1910) The control of the Argentine ant. Bulletin 207:53–82. University of California Publications, Berkeley Google Scholar
  66. Zina V, Garcia A, Valente C, Branco M, Franco JC (2015) Ant species (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) associated to eucalyptus plantations in Portugal. Artículos y notas 11Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IHC—Institute of Contemporary HistoryNOVA-FCSHLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations