Abstract
In this paper, the design and proof of concept (POC) coding of a local hidden variable computer model is presented. The program violates the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality |CHSH| ≤ 2. In our numerical experiment, we find with our local computer program, CHSH \(\approx 1 + \sqrt {2}\).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Jammer, M.: The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. Wiley-Interscience, New York (1974)
Merzbacher, E.: Quantum Mechanics. Wiley, New York (1970)
Hameka, H.F.: Quantum Mechanics. A Conceptual Approach. Wiley-Interscience, New York (2004)
Rae, A.: Quantum Mechanics. IOP, London (2002)
Greiner, W.: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, Wave Equations, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin (2000)
Haag, R.: Trying to divide the universe. In: Borowiec, A., Cegla, W., Jancewicz, B., Karowski, W. (eds.) Theoretical Physics Fin de Sciecle. Springer, Berlin (2000)
Bell, J.S.: On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox. Physics 1, 195–200 (1964)
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., Rosen, N.: Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete. Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935)
Wheeler, J.A., Zurek, W.H.: Quantum Theory and Measurement, pp. 356–369. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1983)
Bohm, D.: Quantum Theory, p. 614. Prentice-Hall, New York (1951)
Peres, A.: Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods, pp. 165–172. Kluwer Academic, New York (2002)
Clauser, J.F., Horne, M.A., Shimony, A., Holt, R.A.: Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variables theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880–884 (1969)
Gill, R.D.: Time, finite statistics, and bells fifth position (2003). arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0301059v1
Weihs, G., Jennewein, T., Simon, C., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A.: Violation of Bell’s inequality under strict Einstein locality conditions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5039–5043 (1998)
Geurdes, J.F., Nagata, K., Nakamura, T., Farouk, A.: A note on the possibility of incomplete theory (2017). arXiv:1704.00005
Aspect, A.: Proposed experiment to test the nonseparability of quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. D14, 1944–1955 (1976)
Geurdes, J.F.: A probability loophole in the CHSH. Results Phys. 4, 81–82 (2014)
Gill, R.D.: No probability loophole in the CHSHS. Results Phys. 5, 156–157 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2015.06.002
Geurdes, J.F.: Why one can maintain that there is a probability loophole in the CHSH (2015). arXiv:1508.04798
’t Hooft, G.: How does God play dice? p. 3 (2001). arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0104219v1
Saygin, A.P., Roberts, G., Beber, G.: Comments on “Computing machinery and Intelligence” by Alan Turing. In: Epstein, R., Roberts, G., Poland, G. (eds.) Parsing the Turing Test. Springer, Dordrecht (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6710-5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Geurdes, H. (2018). A Computational Proof of Locality in Entanglement. In: Khrennikov, A., Toni, B. (eds) Quantum Foundations, Probability and Information. STEAM-H: Science, Technology, Engineering, Agriculture, Mathematics & Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74971-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74971-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74970-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74971-6
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)