Advertisement

Values, Transactional Relationships and the Autonomy of Science

  • Pierluigi Barrotta
Chapter
Part of the Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning book series (LARI, volume 16)

Abstract

The fifth chapter reinforces the conclusions reached by the fourth. I will argue that moral evaluations are similar to empirical hypotheses, which are factually controllable. Without sacrificing the due distinctions, science and morality are different aspects of the same inquiry, since they use the same empirical process and the objective of both is the truth. The transactional conception of knowledge and reality will further confirm the presence of a moral dimension in scientific research. The inclusion of moral values in scientific research will lead to examining the responsibilities of science. Through historical examples and general arguments, we will see why the scientist does not just have a responsibility only towards truth. The last section will examine the problem of autonomy in science. The fall of the myth of value-free science does not pose any dangers to the autonomy of science. On the contrary, it is a necessary step to reaffirm it and defend it.

Keywords

Autonomy (a. of science and social values) Convergence (of opinions, in science and morality) Desired/desirable Discovery/creation Ends (ends-in view, ends as termination, ends and values) Environmental economics (use values, existence values, transformative values) Is-ought problem Means/ends Responsibility Technology (language as a t., technology made up of physical instruments) Transactional relationships (between knowledge and reality Between knowledge, reality and morality) Truth Unpredictability thesis (anticipations vs. predictions) Values (ideal v., see ends as termination, see environmental economics) 

References

  1. Bridgman, P. W. (1927). The logic of modern physics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Bridgman, P. W. (1947). Scientists and social responsibility. Scientific Monthly, 65(2), 148–154.Google Scholar
  3. Bush, V. (1945). Science. The endless frontier. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  4. Common, M., & Stagl, S. (2005). Ecological economics. An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dewey, J. (1888). The ethics of democracy. In Dewey (1969–91). The collected works (J. A. Boydstone, Ed.). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. (The early works, Vol. 1, pp. 227–249).Google Scholar
  6. Dewey, J. (1898). Evolution and ethics. In Dewey (1969–91). The collected works. (The early works, Vol. 5, pp. 34–53).Google Scholar
  7. Dewey, J. (1908). Does reality possess practical character? In Dewey (1998). The essential Dewey (L. Hickman & T. Alexander Eds.). Bloomigton/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. (Vol. 1, pp. 124–133).Google Scholar
  8. Dewey, J. (1909). The influence of Darwinism on philosophy. In Dewey (1998). The essential Dewey (Vol. 1, pp. 39–45).Google Scholar
  9. Dewey, J. (1910). The short-cut to realism examined. In Dewey (1969–91). The collected works. (The middle works, Vol. 6, pp. 138–142).Google Scholar
  10. Dewey, J. (1920). Reconstruction in philosophy. In Dewey (1969–91). The collected works. (The middle works, Vol. 12, pp. 77–201).Google Scholar
  11. Dewey, J. (1922). Human nature and conduct. In Dewey (1969–91). The collected works. (The middle works, Vol. 14).Google Scholar
  12. Dewey, J. (1925). Experience and nature. In Dewey (1969–91). The collected works. (The later works, Vol. 1).Google Scholar
  13. Dewey, J. (1932). Ethics. In Dewey (1969–91). The collected works. (The later works, Vol. 7).Google Scholar
  14. Dewey, J. (1934). A common faith. In Dewey (1969–91) The collected works. (The later works, Vol. 9, pp. 1–58).Google Scholar
  15. Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. In Dewey (1969–91). The collected work. (The later works, Vol. 12).Google Scholar
  16. Dewey, J. (1939). Theory of valuation. In Dewey (1969–91). The collected works. (The later works, Vol. 13, 189–251).Google Scholar
  17. Dewey, J. (1946). Problems of men. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
  18. Dewey J., & Bentley A. F. (1949). Knowing and the known, reprinted in 1975. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  19. Diamond, P. A., & Hausman, J. A. (1994). Contingent valuation: Is some number better than no number? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(4), 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Douglas, H. (2003). The moral responsibilities of scientists (tensions between autonomy and responsibility). American Philosophical Quarterly, 40(1), 59–68.Google Scholar
  21. Forge, J. (2008). The responsible scientist. A philosophical inquiry. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  22. Galison, P., & Hevly, B. W. (Eds.). (1992). Big science. The growth of large-scale research. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gouinlock, J. (1972). John Dewey’s philosophy of value. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  24. Graham, L. R. (1987). Science, philosophy, and human behavior in the Soviet Union. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Guston, D. H. (2012). The pumpkin or the tiger? Michael Polanyi, Frederick Soddy, and anticipating emerging technologies. Minerva, 50, 363–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hansson, B. (1981). The decision game: The conceptualisation of risk and utility. In E. Morscher & R. Stranzinger (Eds.), Ethics: Foundations, problems, and applications (pp. 187–193). Hӧlder-Pichler-Tempsky: Hӧlder/Vienna.Google Scholar
  28. Hildebrand, D. L. (2003). Beyond realism and anti-realism. John Dewey and the Neopragmatism. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hildebrand, D. L. (2008). Dewey. Oxford: Oneworld Books.Google Scholar
  30. Hurlbut, W. (2005). Altered nuclear transfer as a morally acceptable means for the procurement oh human embryonic stem cells. Perspective in Biology and Medicine, 48(2), 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kitcher, P. (2001). Science, truth, and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kitcher, P. (2011). Science in a democratic society. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  33. Light, A., & Rolston, H., III (Eds.). (2003). Environmental ethics. An anthology. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  34. Misak, C. J. (2004). Truth and the end of inquiry. A Peircean account of truth (1st ed., 1991). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Montagnini, L. (2005). Le armonie del disordine. Norbert Wiener, matematico-filosofo del Novecento. Venezia: Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti.Google Scholar
  36. Norton, B. (1987). Why preserve natural variety? Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Norton, B. (2005). Sustainability. A philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Oppenheimer, J. R. (1955). The open mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  39. Polanyi, M. (1946). Science, faith, and society. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Polanyi, M. (1951). The logic of liberty. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  41. Polanyi, M. (1962). The republic of science: Its political and economic theory. Minerva, 38(2000), 1–32.Google Scholar
  42. Putnam, H. (1994). The diversity of the sciences, in words and life. In J. Conant (Ed.), (pp. 463–480). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Rhodes, R. (1986). The making of atomic bomb. New York: Touchstone Books.Google Scholar
  44. Richardson, H. S. (1994). Practical reasoning about final ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Robbins, L. (1935). An essay on the nature and significance of economic science (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  46. Sarkar, S. (2005). Biodiversity and environmental philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sleeper, R. W. (2001). The necessity of pragmatism. John’s Dewey’s conception of philosophy (1st ed., 1986). Urbana/Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  48. Stocker, M. (1990). Pluralism and conflicting values. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  49. Talisse, R. (2007). A pragmatist philosophy of democracy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Wiener N. (1947). A scientist rebels. In Winer, Collected works. With commentaries (4 vols., P. Masani, Ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1976–1985 (Vol. 4, p. 748).Google Scholar
  51. Wiener N. (1949). A rebellious scientist after two years. In Wiener, Collected works. With commentaries (4 vols., P. Masani, Ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1976–1985 (Vol. 4, pp. 749–750).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pierluigi Barrotta
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civilizations and Forms of KnowledgeUniversity of PisaPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations