Advertisement

Analysing the Relationships Between Digital Literacy and Self-Regulated Learning of Undergraduates—A Preliminary Investigation

  • Udayangi Perera Muthupoltotage
  • Lesley Gardner
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 26)

Abstract

Advances in technology access allow undergraduates to personalize their learning to their individual interests via the creation and use of informal personal learning environments (PLEs). A comprehensive understanding of how every day digital technologies are adapted and used to create such PLEs and their impact on acquisition and development of students’ digital literacy (DL) and self-regulated learning (SRL) skills, is still lacking. This paper presents the initial exploratory quantitative phase, of a longitudinal mixed methods study planned to identify and describe the relationship between DL and SRL skills of students, when using PLEs. Structural equation modelling was used to analyze data collected from 202 participants in online surveys. The results confirm that DL components effect some SRL sub-processes and some evidence was obtained for reciprocal relationships. Implications for Information Systems theory and practice are discussed together with future research opportunities.

Keywords

Digital literacy Self-regulated learning Personal learning environments 

References

  1. 1.
    Vivian, R., Barnes, A.: Social networking: from living technology to learning technology? Curric. Technol. Transform. Unkn. Future Proc. Ascilite Syd. 1007–1019 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fruhmann, K., Nussbaumer, A., Albert, D.: A psycho-pedagogical framework for self-regulated learning in a responsive open learning environment. In: Proceedings of the International Conference eLearning Baltics Science (eLBa Science 2010), pp. 1–2. Fraunhofer (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tausend, J.: How students use technology outside of the classroom, EdTech Magazine. http://www.edtechmagazine.com/higher/article/2013/08/how-students-use-technology-outside-classroom. Accessed 04 Aug 2015 (2013)
  4. 4.
    Fiedler, S.H.D., Väljataga, T.: Personal learning environments: concept or technology? Int. J. Virtual Pers. Learn. Environ. 2(4), 1–11 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tess, P.A.: The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual)—a literature review. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(5), A60–A68 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pettenati, M.C.: Roadmap to PLE—a research route to empower the use of personal learning environments (PLEs). Interact. Des. Archit. 2010(9–10), 11 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Keppell, M.J.: Personalised learning strategies for higher education. In: The Future of Learning and Teaching in Next Generation Learning Spaces. International Perspectives on Higher Education Research, pp. 3–21. JAI Press, Bingley, WA. United Kingdom (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eichhorn, B.R.: Common Method Variance Techniques. Clevel. State Univ. Dep. Oper. Supply Chain Manag. Clevel. OH SAS Inst. Inc. (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mikroyannidis, A., Connolly, T.: Chapter 02. Introducing Personal Learning Environments to Informal Learners: Lessons Learned from the OpenLearn Case Study|Open Educational Resources, Open Educational Resources and Social Networks. http://oer.kmi.open.ac.uk/?page_id=1254#.VYzLgfmqpBc. Accessed 26 June 2015 (2012)
  10. 10.
    Laakkonen, I., Taalas, P.: Towards new cultures of learning: personal learning environments as a developmental perspective for improving higher education language courses. Lang. Learn. High. Educ. 5(1) (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., Vojt, G.: Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Comput. Educ. 56(2), 429–440 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zimmerman, B.J.: Becoming a self-regulated learner: an overview. Theory Pract. 41(2), 64 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yang, M., Kim, J.: Correlation between digital literacy and self-regulated learning skills of learners in university e-learning environment. Adv. Sci. Technol. Lett. 71 (Education 2014), 80–83 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Greene, J.A., Moos, D.C., Azevedo, R.: Self-regulation of learning with computer-based learning environments. New Dir. Teach. Learn. 2011(126), 107–115 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Buchem, I.: Editorial for the Special Issue on Personal Learning Environments. Spec. Ed. Pers. Learn. Environ. Curr. Res. Emerg. Pract. 15(2) (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bembenutty, H.: New directions for self-regulation of learning in postsecondary education. New Dir. Teach. Learn. 2011(126), 117–124 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Valtonen, T., Hacklin, S., Dillon, P., Vesisenaho, M., Kukkonen, J., Hietanen, A.: Perspectives on personal learning environments held by vocational students. Comput. Educ. 58(2), 732–739 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gallego, M.J., Gamiz, V.M.: Personal Learning Environments (PLE) in the academic achievement of university students. Aust. Educ. Comput. 29(2) (2015)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kravcik, M., Klamma, R.: Supporting self-regulation by personal learning environments. In: Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on, pp. 710–711. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dabbagh, N., Kitsantas, A.: Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: a natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. Internet High. Educ. 15(1), 3–8 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Eshet, Y.: Digital literacy: a conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. J. Educ. Multimed. Hypermedia. 13(1), 93–106 (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bawden, D.: Origins and concepts of digital literacy. In: Digital Literacies: Concepts, Policies and Practices. Peter Lang, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Eshet, Y.: Thinking in the digital era: a revised model for digital literacy. Issues Informing Sci. Inf. Technol. 9(2), 267–276 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ng, W.: Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Comput. Educ. 59(3), 1065–1078 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zimmerman, B.J.: Chapter 2—attaining self-regulation: a social cognitive perspective. In: Zeidner, M.B.R.P. (ed.) Handbook of Self-Regulation, pp. 13–39. Academic Press, San Diego (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Santoso, H.B., Lawanto, O., Becker, K., Fang, N., Reeve, E.M.: High and low computer self-efficacy groups and their learning behavior from self- regulated learning perspective while engaged in interactive learning modules. J. Pre-Coll. Eng. Educ. Res. J-PEER. 4(2) (2014)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Butler, D.L., Cartier, S.C.: Multiple complementary methods for understanding self-regulated learning as situated in context. In: Meetings of the American Educational Research Association (2005)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Magno, C.: Assessing academic self-regulated learning among Filipino college students: the factor structure and item fit. Int. J. Educ. Psychol. Assess. 5 (2010)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zimmerman, B.J., Martinez-Pons, M.: Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. J. Educ. Psychol. 80(3), 284–290 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Paris, S.G., Byrnes, J.P.: The constructivist approach to self-regulation and learning in the classroom. In: Zimmerman, B.J., Schunk, D.H. (eds.) Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement, pp. 169–200. Springer, New York (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Azevedo, R.: Understanding the complex nature of self-regulatory processes in learning with computer-based learning environments: an introduction. Metacognition Learn 2(2–3), 57–65 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Perera Muthupoltotage, U., Gardner, L., Peiris, A.: Investigating the interrelationship between undergraduates’ digital literacy and self-regulated learning skills. In: ICIS 2016 Proceedings. Dublin, Ireland (2016)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Crano, W.D., Brewer, M.B., Lac, A.: Principles and Methods of Social Research. Routledge (2014)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T., Mckeachie, W.J.: Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educ. Psychol. Meas. 53(3), 801–813 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Roth, A., Ogrin, S., Schmitz, B.: Assessing self-regulated learning in higher education: a systematic literature review of self-report instruments. Educ. Assess. Eval. Account. 1–26 (2015)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fan, W., Yan, Z.: Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: a systematic review. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(2), 132–139 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Handwerk, P.G., Carson, C., Blackwell, K.M.: On-line versus paper-and-pencil surveying of students: a case study. In: 40th Annual Meeting of the Association of Institutional Research (2000)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Krosnick, J.A., Presser, S.: Question and questionnaire design. Handb. Surv. Res. 2, 263–314 (2010)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.-Y., Podsakoff, N.P.: Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88(5), 879–903 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gefen, D., Straub, D., Boudreau, M.-C.: Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 4(1), 7 (2000)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chin, W.W., Marcolin, B.L., Newsted, P.R.: A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Inf. Syst. Res. 14(2), 189–217 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chin, W.W.: How to write up and report PLS analyses. In: Vinzi, V.E., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J., Wang, H. (eds.) Handbook of Partial Least Squares, pp. 655–690. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kock, N.: Using warpPLS in e-collaboration studies: an overview of five main analysis steps. Int. J. E-Collab. IJeC. 6(4), 1–11 (2010)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hair, J.F.J.H., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. SAGE Publications, Inc. (2016)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E.: Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ (2009)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18(1), 39–50 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Podsakoff, P.M., Organ, D.W.: Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J. Manag. 12(4), 531–544 (1986)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kock, N., Lynn, G.: Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: an illustration and recommendations. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 13(7) (2012)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kock, N.: Using warpPLS in e-collaboration studies: descriptive statistics, settings, and key analysis results. Int. J. E-Collab. IJeC. 7(2), 1–18 (2011)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sawilowsky, S.: New effect size rules of thumb. J. Mod. Appl. Stat. Methods. 8(2) (2009)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Zaidieh, A.J.Y.: The use of social networking in education: challenges and opportunities. World Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol. J. WCSIT. 2(1), 18–21 (2012)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Greene, J.A., Yu, S.B., Copeland, D.Z.: Measuring critical components of digital literacy and their relationships with learning. Comput. Educ. 76, 55–69 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Shopova, T.: Digital literacy of students and its improvement at the university. J. Effic. Responsib. Educ. Sci. 7(2), 26–32 (2014)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Zumbrunn, S., Tadlock, J., Roberts, E.D.: Encouraging self-regulated learning in the classroom: a review of the literature. Metrop. Educ. Res. Consort. MERC. 1–28 (2011)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Perera Muthupoltotage, U., Gardner, L.: Undergraduates Perception of Informal Personal Learning Environments: Affordances for Self-regulated Learning. Presented at the 28th Australasian Conference on Information Systems. Hobart, Tasmania (in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Udayangi Perera Muthupoltotage
    • 1
  • Lesley Gardner
    • 1
  1. 1.University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations