Skip to main content

Interpreting the Eigenbasis of Principal Component Analysis to Identify Design Space Regions of Interest

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1062 Accesses

Abstract

Computational models are a valuable tool for predicting the behavior of complex systems in regimes that are difficult, or infeasible to test. Uncertainties in a model resulting from lack of knowledge regarding parameters needed to define system behavior raise concern in simulations predictions, particularly those in extreme operating regimes. In such cases, calibration and validation of numerical models across a large operational domain is beneficial, but creates a high dimensional domain in which the model must be tested. Statistical decomposition methods present an ability to reduce the dimensionality of a measured or simulated quantity while maintaining relevant correlations across the domain, therefore providing insight to important relationships between input parameters and system response throughout many loading scenarios. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is a commonly used statistical decomposition method used to produce a low order projection from a higher dimensional space. Herein, we evaluate a specific component of PCA, the eigenvectors providing statistical weighting to explanatory variables, to identify variable model sensitivity across high dimensional operational domains. The concept is demonstrated by simulation of an elasto-plastic material undergoing tensile testing at variable loading conditions. Results indicate that the eigenbasis reveals distinct relationships between a model’s behavior and uncertain parameters, even when the relationship is not readily apparent and without relying on any a priori knowledge of system or material behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kabanikhin, S.I.: Definitions and examples of inverse and ill-posed problems. J. InverseIll-Posed Prob. 16(4), 317–357 (2008)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Tikhonotv, A.N., Arsenin, V.Y.: Solutions of ill-posed problems. SIAM Rev. 21(2), 266–267 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Donoho, D.L.: High-dimensional data analysis: the curses and blessing of dimensionality. AMS Math Challenges Lecture (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fan, J., Samworth, R.J., Wu, Y.: Ultrahigh dimensional feature selection: beyond the linear model. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 10, 2013–2038 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Xie, C., Li, G.: Quantification of margins and uncertainties approach for structure analysis based on evidence theory. Math. Probl. Eng. 2016, 1–5 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Allemang, R., Kolluri, M.M., Spottswood, M., Eason, T.: Decomposition-based calibration/validation metrics for use with full-field measurement situations. J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des. 51(1), 14–31 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Diana, G., Tommasi, C.: Cross-validation methods in principal component analysis: a comparison. Stat. Methods Appl. 11(1), 71–82 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Josse, J., Husson, F.: Selecting the number of components in principal component analysis using cross-validation approximations. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 56(6), 1869–1879 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Krzanowski, W.J.: Cross-validation in principal component analysis. Biometrics. 43(3), 575–584 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Saltelli, A., Chan, K., Scott, E.M.: Sensitivity Analysis, vol. 1. Wiley, New York (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Pannell, D.J.: Sensitivity analysis of normative economic models: theoretical framework and practical strategies. Agric. Econ. 16(2), 139–152 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, X.-Y., Trame, M., Lesko, L., Schmidt, S.: Sobol sensitivity analysis: a tool to guide the development and evaluation of systems pharmacology models. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst. Pharmacol. 4(2), 69–79 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jolliffe, I.T.: Principal Component Analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Suhr, D.D.: Principal Component Analysis vs. Exploratory Factor Analysis, SUGI 30 Proceeding, No. 203–30 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lin, Y.C., Chen, X.: A Crtitical review of experimental results and constitutive descriptions for metals and alloys in hot working. Mater. Des. 32(4), 1733–1759 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kotkunde, N., Deole, A.D., Gupta, A.K., Singh, S.K.: Comparative study of constitutive Modeling for Ti-6Al-4V alloy at low strain rates and elevated temperatures. Mater. Des. 55, 999–1005 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to extend our gratitude to Los Alamos National Laboratory and the University of California San Diego for supporting this project through the Los Alamos Dynamics Summer School.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. N. Stevens .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Daughton, B., Alexeenko, P., Alexander, D., Stevens, G.N., Casleton, E.M. (2019). Interpreting the Eigenbasis of Principal Component Analysis to Identify Design Space Regions of Interest. In: Barthorpe, R. (eds) Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, Volume 3. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74793-4_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74793-4_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74792-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74793-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics