STEM Women Faculty Struggling for Recognition and Advancement in a “Men’s Club” Culture



Despite having made a number of positive steps to advance diversity and provide support for women scientist in the past ten years, STEM research institutions continue to be an environment where women faculty face a kind of “patriarchal DNA” that treats women scientists as subordinate to men. An environment continues to exist where women faculty often feel unwelcome, and unsatisfied with the rate of their accomplishments. At the time of promotion and tenure women can feel a sense of betrayal as their work is evaluated as being “less than” the work of men. To be successful in a derisive environment, many STEM women faculty report that they have developed coping strategies to adapt to a culture that often excludes them from occupying senior leadership roles, diminishes their accomplishments, and makes them feel remorseful for trying to find a work–life balance.


Women Stem Women Faculty Institutional Betrayal Microaggressions STEM Disciplines 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We acknowledge the support provided by the National Science Foundation through grant HRD 1409171. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.


  1. Aguirre, A., Jr. (2000). Women and minority faculty in the academic workplace: Recruitment, retention, and academic culture. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 27(6). Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series: ERIC.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, T. D., Herst, D. E., Bruck, C. S., & Sutton, M. (2000). Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(2), 278.Google Scholar
  3. Augoustinos, M., & Every, D. (2007). The language of “race” and prejudice: A discourse of denial, reason, and liberal-practical politics. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26(2), 123–141.Google Scholar
  4. August, L., & Waltman, J. (2004). Culture, climate, and contribution: Career satisfaction among female faculty. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 177–192.Google Scholar
  5. Austin, A. E., & Gamson, Z. F. (1983). Academic Workplace: New Demands, Heightened Tensions. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Research Report (Vol. 10). Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.Google Scholar
  6. Barnes, A. S. (2000). Everyday Racism: A Book for All Americans. Chicago, IL: Sourcebooks, Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Benard, S., & Correll, S. J. (2010). Normative discrimination and the motherhood penalty. Gender & Society, 24(5), 616–646.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, S. M., & Corcoran, M. (1986). Perspectives on the professional socialization of women faculty: A case of accumulative disadvantage? The Journal of Higher Education, 57(1), 20–43.Google Scholar
  9. Collins, P. H. (2002). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Constantine, M. G., Smith, L., Redington, R. M., & Owens, D. (2008). Racial microaggressions against Black counseling and counseling psychology faculty: A central challenge in the multicultural counseling movement. Journal of Counseling & Development, 86(3), 348–355.Google Scholar
  11. Correll, S. J., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112(5), 1297–1338.Google Scholar
  12. Cuddy, A. J., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2004). When professionals become mothers, warmth doesn’t cut the ice. Journal of Social Issues, 60(4), 701–718.Google Scholar
  13. Ecklund, E., & Lincoln, A. E. (2016). Failing Families, Failing Science: Work-Family Conflict in Academic Science. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  14. Essed, P. (1991). Understanding Everyday Racism: An Interdisciplinary Theory (Vol. 2). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Etzkowitz, H., Kemelgor, C., & Uzzi, B. (2000). Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology. Cambridge‚ New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fleras, A. (2016). Theorizing Micro-aggressions as Racism 3.0: Shifting the discourse. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 48(2), 1–19.Google Scholar
  17. Fox, M. F. (2001). Women, science, and academia: Graduate education and careers. Gender & Society, 15(5), 654–666.Google Scholar
  18. Fox, M. F., & Colatrella, C. (2006). Participation, performance, and advancement of women in academic science and engineering: What is at issue and why. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(3), 377–386.Google Scholar
  19. Frazier, K. N. (2011). Academic bullying: A barrier to tenure and promotion for African-American faculty. Florida Journal of Educational Administration & Policy, 5(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
  20. Gardner, S. K. (2012). “I couldn’t wait to leave the toxic environment”: A mixed methods study of women faculty satisfaction and departure from one research institution. NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education, 5(1), 71–95.Google Scholar
  21. Grant, L., Kennelly, I., & Ward, K. B. (2000). Revisiting the gender, marriage, and parenthood puzzle in scientific careers. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 28(1/2), 62–85.Google Scholar
  22. Guarino, C. M., & Borden, V. M. (2017). Faculty service loads and gender: Are women taking care of the academic family? Research in Higher Education, 58(6), 672–694.Google Scholar
  23. Hagedorn, L. S. (2000). Conceptualizing faculty job satisfaction: Components, theories, and outcomes. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2000(105), 5–20.Google Scholar
  24. Hill, J. H. (2009). The Everyday Language of White Racism. Oxford, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Jayakumar, U. M., Howard, T. C., Allen, W. R., & Han, J. C. (2009). Racial privilege in the professoriate: An exploration of campus climate, retention, and satisfaction. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(5), 538–563.Google Scholar
  26. Johnsrud, L. K., & Heck, R. H. (1994). A university’s faculty: Identifying who will leave and who will stay. Journal for Higher Education Management, 10(1), 71–84.Google Scholar
  27. Johnsrud, L. K., & Wunsch, M. (1991). Junior and senior faculty women: Commonalities and differences in perceptions of academic life. Psychological Reports, 69(3), 879–886.Google Scholar
  28. Kornberg, J. C. (2008). Jumping on the mommy track: A tax for working mothers. UCLA Women’s LJ, 17, 187.Google Scholar
  29. Kubota, R. (2015). Race and language learning in multicultural Canada: Towards critical antiracism. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 36(1), 3–12.Google Scholar
  30. Morgan, G. (1998). Images of Organization (The Executive Edition). California: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc. and Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  31. National Science Foundation. (2006). ADVANCE: Increasing the Participation and Advancement of Women in Academic Science and Engineering Careers. Retrieved from
  32. Ong, M. (2005). Body projects of young women of color in physics: Intersections of gender, race, and science. Social Problems, 52(4), 593–617.Google Scholar
  33. Patton, M., & Westby, C. (1992). Ethnography and research: A qualitative review. Topics in Language Disorders, 12(3), 1–14.Google Scholar
  34. Pérez Huber, L., & Solorzano, D. G. (2015). Visualizing everyday racism: Critical race theory, visual microaggressions, and the historical image of Mexican banditry. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(3), 223–238.Google Scholar
  35. Pittman, C. T. (2010). Race and gender oppression in the classroom: The experiences of women faculty of color with white male students. Teaching Sociology, 38(3), 183–196.Google Scholar
  36. Rosser, V. J. (2004). Faculty members’ intentions to leave: A national study on their worklife and satisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 45(3), 285–309.Google Scholar
  37. Rothblum, E. D. (1988). Leaving the ivory tower: Factors contributing to women’s voluntary resignation from academia. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 14–17.Google Scholar
  38. Shin, H. (2015). Everyday racism in Canadian schools: Ideologies of language and culture among Korean transnational students in Toronto. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 36(1), 67–79.Google Scholar
  39. Shoshana, A. (2016). The language of everyday racism and microaggression in the workplace: Palestinian professionals in Israel. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39(6), 1052–1069.Google Scholar
  40. Smart, J. C. (1990). A causal model of faculty turnover intentions. Research in Higher Education, 31(5), 405–424.Google Scholar
  41. Smith, C. P., & Freyd, J. J. (2014). Institutional betrayal. American Psychologist, 69(6), 575.Google Scholar
  42. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Procedures and Techniques for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. Turner, C. S. V. (2002). Women of color in academe: Living with multiple marginality. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 74–93.Google Scholar
  44. Turner, C. S. V., & González, J. C. (2011). Faculty women of color: The critical nexus of race and gender. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 4(4), 199.Google Scholar
  45. Umbach, P. D. (2006). The contribution of faculty of color to undergraduate education. Research in Higher Education, 47(3), 317–345.Google Scholar
  46. Ward, K., & Wolf-Wendel, L. (2004). Academic motherhood: Managing complex roles in research universities. The Review of Higher Education, 27(2), 233–257.Google Scholar
  47. Wolf-Wendel, L., & Ward, K. (2013). Work and family integration for faculty: Recommendations for chairs. Department Chair, 23, 1–3.Google Scholar
  48. Xu, Y. J. (2008). Gender disparity in STEM disciplines: A study of faculty attrition and turnover intentions. Research in Higher Education, 49(7), 607–624.Google Scholar
  49. Zhou, Y., & Volkwein, J. F. (2004). Examining the influences on faculty departure intentions: A comparison of tenured versus nontenured faculty at research universities using NSOPF-99. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 139–176.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Language, Culture, and SocietyOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.School of Public PolicyOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  3. 3.School of Chemical, Biological and Environmental EngineeringOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations