Study of Seismic Capacity of Masonry Infilled Reinforced Concrete Frames Considering the Influence of Frame Strength

  • Hamood Al-Washali
  • Kiwoong Jin
  • Masaki Maeda
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Natural Hazards book series (SPRINGERNAT)


Unreinforced masonry infilled-RC frames are widely used in many developing countries. Even though the influence of the masonry walls on the behavior of structure was recognized from the experience of past earthquake disasters, but many practicing engineers still assume that the infill walls are non-structural walls due to incomplete knowledge of the behavior of such structures. In this paper, an experimental study of two ½ scale specimens with different RC frames and masonry infill walls were tested using a static cyclic loading protocol. The main parameter was the influence of changing the RC frame strength on masonry infill seismic capacity. The results showed that shear strength and deformation capacity of masonry infill greatly improved by increasing the strength of boundary frame. The investigation of strength, ductility and initial stiffness based on experimental results and comparative study with existing methods showed large variations between several methods commonly used to assess the seismic capacity of masonry infill.


Reinforced concrete buildings Masonry infill Seismic capacity Boundary frame strength 



The study presented in this article was sponsored by the Science and Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable Development (SATREPS) project (Bangladesh, 2015 project headed by Professor Nakano Yoshiaki, University of Tokyo) and it’s gratefully acknowledged. Opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors, and do not necessarily represent those of the SATREPS project.


  1. Al-Washali H, Suzuki Y, Maeda M (2017) Seismic evaluation of reinforced concrete buildings with masonry infill wall. In: The 16th world conference of earthquake engineering, ChileGoogle Scholar
  2. American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2011) Standard test method for compressive strength of masonry prisms. ASTM C1314, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  3. Architectural Institute of Japan (AIJ) (2010) AIJ standard for structural calculation of reinforced concrete structuresGoogle Scholar
  4. FEMA 306 (1998) Evaluation of earthquake damaged concrete and masonry wall buildings—basic procedures manual. Report No. FEMA 306 (ATC-43 Project)Google Scholar
  5. Flanagan RD, Bennett RM (1999) In-plane behavior of structural clay tile infilled frames. J Struct Eng 125(6):590–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Liauw TC, Kwan KH (1985) Unified plastic analysis for infilled frames. J Struct Eng 111(7):1427–1448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mehrabi AB, Shing PB, Schuller M, Noland J (1996) Experimental evaluation of masonry-infilled RC frames. J Struct Eng ASCE 122(3)Google Scholar
  8. Paulay T, Priestley MJN (1992) Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. Wiley, New JerseyCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of EngineeringTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan

Personalised recommendations