Advertisement

A Plea for People Centered Perspectives on Seismic Risk Evaluation

  • Mihai Şercăianu
  • Ioana Nenciu
  • Bogdan Suditu
  • Marina Neagu
  • Roxana Popescu
  • Diana Murzea
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Natural Hazards book series (SPRINGERNAT)

Abstract

The issue of seismic risk in Bucharest, a 1.7 mil people Capital, is very much ignored, considering the scale and the urgency. Seismic risk assessment needs to focus also on human losses, rather than on physical aspects like location, construction materials, etc. “How many people live in seismic risk housing?” is a question not even the municipality can give a recent evidence based answer to. The paper presents the results of ALERT—seismic risk mitigation project, started in Bucharest in February 2016. ALERT is based on an online data crowdsourcing platform regarding seismic risk housing (with particular focus on the number, needs and problems of their inhabitants). The Alert poll results, as of September 2017 indicate the severity of the problem. More than 8000 dwellers were counted in 80% of the highest seismic risk buildings (Seismic Risk Class I) and it is expected that by the end of the research the 10,000 people threshold will be long exceeded. The paper is intended to highlight insights on ownership, occupancy and management of these buildings. The conclusion argues the need for a more human centric approach of seismic risk assessment to complement the engineering and geological perspectives.

Keywords

Social vulnerability Awareness Housing Ownership Social vulnerability 

References

  1. Armaș I, Toma-Dănilă D, Ionescu R, Gavriș A (2017) Vulnerability to earthquake hazard: Bucharest case study, Romania. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 8(2):182–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bică AG (2013) The seismic vulnerability of the Romanian built-up environment to earthquake action. Ph.D. thesis, University Construction Engineering BucharestGoogle Scholar
  3. City Hall of Bucharest, list of evaluated buildings. http://www.pmb.ro/servicii/alte_informatii/lista_imobilelor_exp/docs/Lista_imobilelor_expertizate.pdf. Accessed on 09 Sept 2016
  4. D’Ercole R, Robert J, Hardy S, Ponte E, Vernier P, Popescu R, Etaby S, Salome G, Vicario T (2013) Utilisateurs des ressources de gestion de crise et problèmes. In: La population de Tabarre et ses vulnérabilités, Raportul proiectului SIRV-TAB, vol 2. COOPI, IRD, ECHO, Mairie de Tabarre, CNIGS, CIAT, DPC, Port-au-Prince, p 623Google Scholar
  5. Ministry of Regional Development and Public Administration (2015–2016) Annual program actions for the design and execution of consolidation work to multi-storeyed dwelling buildings, classified by technical expertise report in the first class of seismic risk and posing public danger (red dot buildings)Google Scholar
  6. Ministry of Regional Development and Public Administration (2016) Efficient and transparent co-ordination and selection of infrastructure financing from structural instruments and from the State budget for 2014–2020, SMIS code 48659—Component 4—Living in Romania. Towards a National Housing Strategy, http://www.mdrap.ro/lucrari-publice/-3175

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mihai Şercăianu
    • 1
  • Ioana Nenciu
    • 2
  • Bogdan Suditu
    • 3
  • Marina Neagu
    • 2
  • Roxana Popescu
    • 4
  • Diana Murzea
    • 5
  1. 1.Urban Engineering and Regional Development DepartmentTechnical University of Civil Engineering of BucharestBucureştiRomania
  2. 2.BucureştiRomania
  3. 3.Faculty of GeographyUniversity of BucharestBucureştiRomania
  4. 4.Risk and Vulnerability ExpertGeneral Inspectorate for Emergency SituationsBucureştiRomania
  5. 5.Center for Innovation in Local DevelopmentBucureştiRomania

Personalised recommendations