Earthquake Risk Assessment for Seismic Safety and Sustainability

Conference paper
Part of the Springer Natural Hazards book series (SPRINGERNAT)

Abstract

An interaction of three major risk components (seismic hazards, vulnerability and exposure) are analysed here, and preventive measures to mitigate disasters are discussed. The importance of action-oriented research on earthquake risk reduction co-produced with multiple stakeholders, including engineers and policymakers, is analysed. This importance is evidenced by the increasing vulnerability and exposure of society to risk in many earthquake-prone regions and by the need for cross-cutting actions in policy and practice related to sustainability.

Keywords

Earthquake Hazard Vulnerability Exposure 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges a support from the German Science Foundation (DFG grant IS-203/4-1).

References

  1. Ambraseys N, Bilham R (2011) Corruption kills. Nature 469:153–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ando M, Ishida M, Hayashi Y, Mizuki C (2011) Interviews with survivors of Tohoku earthquake provide insights into fatality rate. EOS Trans AGU 92(46):411. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011EO460005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Babayev G, Ismail-Zadeh A, Le Mouël J-L (2010) Scenario-based earthquake hazard and risk assessment for Baku (Azerbaijan). Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci 10:2697–2712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker J (2013) Seismology: quake catcher. Nature 498:290–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beer T, Ismail-Zadeh A (eds) (2003) Risk science and sustainability. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  6. Boaz A, Hayden C (2002) Pro-active evaluators: enabling research to be useful, usable and used. Evaluation 8:440–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cummings RG, Brookshire DS, Schulze WD et al (eds) (1986) Valuing environmental goods: an assessment of the contingent valuation method. Rowman & Allanheld, TotowaGoogle Scholar
  8. Cutter S, Ismail-Zadeh A, Alcántara-Ayala I, Altan O, Baker DN, Briceño S, Gupta H, Holloway A, Johnston D, McBean GA, Ogawa Y, Paton D, Porio E, Silbereisen RK, Takeuchi K, Valsecchi GB, Vogel C, Wu G (2015) Pool knowledge to stem losses from disasters. Nature 522:277–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fuchs K (2009) The great earthquakes of Lisbon 1755 and Aceh 2004 shook the world. Seismologists’ societal responsibility. In: Mendes-Victor LA et al (eds) The 1755 Lisbon earthquake: revisited. Geotechnical, geological, and earthquake engineering, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 43–64Google Scholar
  10. Ghafory-Ashtiany M (2014) Earthquake risk and risk reduction capacity building in Iran. In: Ismail-Zadeh A, Urrutia Fucugauchi J, Kijko A, Takeuchi K, Zaliapin I (eds) Extreme natural hazards, disaster risks and societal implications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 267–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gluckman P (2016) The science–policy interface. Science 353:969. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aai8837
  12. Hirsch Hadorn G, Hoffmann-Riem H, Biber-Klemm S et al (eds) (2008) Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  13. IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. In: Field CB, Barros V, Stocker TF et al. (eds) A special report of working groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. IRDR (2013) Issue brief: disaster risk reduction and sustainable development. Integrated Research on Disaster Risk, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  15. Ismail-Zadeh A (2010) Computational geodynamics as a component of comprehensive seismic hazards analysis. In: Beer T (ed) Geophysical hazards: minimizing risk and maximizing awareness. Springer, Amsterdam, pp 161–178Google Scholar
  16. Ismail-Zadeh A (2014) Extreme seismic events: from basic science to disaster risk mitigation. In: Ismail-Zadeh A, Urrutia Fucugauchi J, Kijko A, Takeuchi K, Zaliapin I (eds) Extreme natural hazards, disaster risks and societal implications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 47–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ismail-Zadeh A, Cutter S (eds) (2015) Disaster risks research and assessment to promote risk reduction and management. ICSU-ISSC, ParisGoogle Scholar
  18. Ismail-Zadeh A, Takeuchi K (2007) Preventive disaster management of extreme natural events. Nat Haz 42:459–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ismail-Zadeh A, Cutter SL, Takeuchi K, Paton D (2017) Forging a paradigm shift in disaster science. Nat Haz 86(2):969–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kant I (1756) Geschichte und Naturbeschreibung der merkwürdigsten Vorfälle des Erdbebens welches an dem Ende des 1755 sten Jahres einen großen Theil der Erde erschüttert hat. KönigsbergGoogle Scholar
  21. Kantorovich L, Keilis-Borok VI, Molchan G (1973) Seismic risk and principles of seismic zoning. In: Keilis-Borok VI (ed) Computational and statistical methods for interpretation of seismic data. Nauka, Moscow, pp 3–20 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  22. Manaker DM, Calais E, Freed AM, Ali ST, Przybylski P, Mattioli G, Jansma P, Prepetit C, de Chabalier JB (2008) Interseismic plate coupling and strain partitioning in the Northeastern Caribbean. Geophys J Int 174:889–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Satake K, Sawai Y, Shishikura M, Okamura Y, Namegaya Y, Yamaki S (2007) Tsunami source of the unusual AD 869 earthquake off Miyagi, Japan, inferred from tsunami deposits and numerical simulation of inundation. In: Abstracts of the American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2007. Abstract T31G-03Google Scholar
  24. Sendai Framework (2015) Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. http://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/publications/43291. Accessed 28 Aug 2017
  25. Showstack R (2015) Geoscientists: focus more on societal concerns. Eos Trans AGU 96(17).  https://doi.org/10.1029/2015eo034063. https://eos.org/articles/geoscientists-focus-more-on-societal-concerns. Accessed 23 Aug 2017
  26. UN (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. A/RES/70/1. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. UN (2017) Report of the open-ended intergovernmental expert working group on indicators and terminology relating to disaster risk reduction. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/50683_oiewgreportenglish.pdf. Accessed 28 Aug 2017
  28. UNGA (1987) United Nations General Assembly Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. UN Headquarters, New York. http://www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm. Accessed 28 Aug 2017
  29. UNISDR (2013) The global assessment report on disaster risk reduction (GAR2013). UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, GenevaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Applied GeosciencesKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations