Enacting Ethical Futures
The legalisation of mitochondrial donation is the latest iteration of a particular UK sociotechnical imaginary around human embryo research and use; one in which strict but permissive oversight and licensing from the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) operates to legitimise practice. This imaginary has an embedded notion of the good society as ethical, consultative, concerned about the welfare of its citizens and economically successful. Its continued durability increased the amenability of mainstream UK biomedical politics to legalising the techniques, and through this we see the operation of power. We reflect upon the relationship between mitochondrial donation and the next invocation, and potential iteration, of this imaginary: contestation about Crispr/Cas9 gene editing. We close by articulating how the legalisation of mitochondrial donation is the enactment of an ethical future.
KeywordsSociotechnical imaginary Enacting ethical futures Mitochondrial donation Gene editing Crispr/Cas9
- Chan, S., Donovan, P. J., Douglas, T., Gyngell, C., et al. (2015). Genome editing technologies and human germline genetic modification: The Hinxton Group consensus statement. The American Journal of Bioethics, 15(12), 42–47.Google Scholar
- Connor, S. (2015, February 3). ‘Three-parent babies’: Britain votes in favour of law change. The Independent. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/three-parent-babies-britain-votes-strongly-in-favour-of-law-change-10021265.html [accessed 13 Nov 2017].
- Craven, L., Alston, C. L., Taylor, R. W., & Turnbull, D. M. (2017). Recent advances in mitochondrial disease. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 18, 257–275. Google Scholar
- Dimond, R., & Stephens, N. (2017). Three persons, three genetic contributors, three parents: Mitochondrial donation, genetic parenting and the immutable grammar of the ‘three x x’. Health. http://dx.doi.org//10.1177/1363459316689380.
- Henderson, M. (2015, February 5). Three-person embryos: How the mitochondrial donation battle was won. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/feb/05/three-person-embryos-mitochondrial-donation-prof-dough-turnbull [accessed 27 Oct 2017].
- Herbrand, C., & Dimond, R. (2017). Mitochondrial donation, patient engagement and narratives of hope. Sociology of Health and Illness. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12631.
- HFEA. (2016, November). Scientific review of the safety and efficacy of methods to avoid mitochondrial disease through assisted conception: 2016 update. http://hfeaarchive.uksouth.cloudapp.azure.com/www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/Fourth_scientific_review_mitochondria_2016.pdf [accessed 27 Nov 2017].
- Jasanoff, S., Hurlbut, B., & Saha, K. (2015). CRISPR democracy: Gene editing and the need for inclusive deliberation. Issues in Science and Technology, 32(1), 25–32. http://issues.org/32-1/crispr-democracy-gene-editing-and-the-need-for-inclusive-deliberation/.
- Mulvihill, J. J., Capps, B., Joly, Y., Lysaght, T., Zwart, H. A., Chadwick, R., et al. (2017). Ethical issues of CRISPR technology and gene editing through the lens of solidarity. British Medical Bulletin, 122(1), 17–29.Google Scholar
- National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Human genome editing: Science, ethics, and governance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Google Scholar
- Nuffield Council on Bioethics. (2016, September). Genome editing: An ethical review.Google Scholar
- Pearlman, A. (2017, November 15). Biohackers are using CRISPR on their DNA and we can’t stop it. New Scientist. https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg23631520-100-biohackers-are-using-crispr-on-their-dna-and-we-cant-stop-it [accessed 27 Nov 2017].
- Ridley, M. (2016, December 19). Our brilliant biologists are changing the world. The Times. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/our-brilliant-biologists-are-changing-the-world-t9d0fvv8l [accessed 10 Dec 2017].
- Sample, I. (2018, February 1). UK doctors select first women to have ‘three-person babies’. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/feb/01/permission-given-to-create-britains-first-three-person-babies [accessed 5 Mar 2018].
- Taussig, K.-S. R., Rapp, R., & Heath, D. (2003). Flexible eugenics: Technologies of the self in the age of genetics. In A. H. Goodman, D. Heath, & S. M. Lindee (Eds.), Genetic nature/culture: Anthropology and science beyond the two-culture divide (pp. 58–70). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Wehling, P., Viehover, W., & Koenen, S. (2015). The public shaping of medical research: Patient associations, health movements and biomedicine. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar