Abstract
Interpretation of this case is built around the role of individuals and, specifically, of intra-organizational leaders in the processes of institutionalization and learning of new governance patterns. The analysis illustrates that even in the face of complex problems and public pressure for inclusion of external stakeholders, the shift from government to governance is neither obvious nor necessary. As the old, hierarchical ways remain the default option, whether the new way of governing will be enacted depends solely on the mobilization and purposive efforts of institutional entrepreneurs acting within the organizational structures of the administration.
The authorities of this town do not talk to people. They are afraid of people (…) I can see fear in their eyes when something like this happens: protests, openly expressed dissatisfaction of certain groups. First, they never consult any ideas either with us – lower level municipality administration – or with the stakeholder groups, because they think we are stupid and have nothing to contribute. When they eventually do something, they get lambasted. And then they start fretting again: ‘What shall we do in order to reverse it’?
Municipality Mayor, interview, March 2013
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In terms of governance and delegation of public services to the non-public organizations, it is interesting that the intervention was initially conducted by a private security firm hired by a debt collector whose role was to collect payments that merchants owed to the city. Tear gas inside the halls was, in fact, used by the private security firm workers, not the police.
References
Battilana, J., B. Leca, and E. Boxenbaum. 2009. How Actors Change Institutions: Towards a Theory of Institutional Entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Annals 3 (1): 64–107.
Hood, Christopher. 2000. The Art of the State: Culture, Rhetoric, and Public Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McLaverty, P. 2011. Participation. In The Sage Handbook of Governance, 402–418. London: Sage.
Osborne, Stephen, and T. Gaebler. 1992. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming Public Sector. New York: Plenum.
Pierre, Jon, and B. Guy Peters. 2000. Governance, Politics and the State. New York: Macmillan.
Selznick, Philipp. 1957. Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Washington, M., Kimberly Boal, and John Davis. 2008. Institutional Leadership: Past, Present, and Future. In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, ed. R. Suddaby, K. Sahlin-Andersson, C. Oliver, and R. Greenwood, 719–733. London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Strumińska-Kutra, M. (2018). Public Administration Leaders as Institutional Entrepreneurs: Dispute over the Location of a Marketplace. In: Democratizing Public Management. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74591-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74591-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74590-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74591-6
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)