Advertisement

Small States and Regional Dispute Resolution Mechanisms: The Caribbean and Pacific Experiences

Chapter
Part of the The World of Small States book series (WSS, volume 3)

Abstract

The growing number of international dispute settlement mechanisms over the past decades has been critically addressed in academic literature. Concerns have also been voiced as to whether ‘small states’ as specific actors are disadvantaged in their participation in international dispute resolution. When such dispute resolution mechanisms are incorporated in regional integration schemes, similar concerns arise: small states participating in these integration processes, it is argued, face particular challenges due to their lack of quantitative resources, not least due to their narrow population base. This article analyses dispute resolution mechanisms of two regional integration schemes—the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) and the currently negotiated Pacific Agreement on Closer Economic Relations (PACER)-Plus—in order to ascertain whether these mechanisms fit challenges resulting from the smallness of the participating member states.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Petra Butler, Hannes Ingwersen and Steven Finizio for their critical and helpful comments on earlier drafts. Any opinions or errors remain exclusively mine.

References

  1. Alesina A, Spolaore E (2003) The size of nations. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Alwazir J et al (2017) Challenges in correspondent banking in the small states of the Pacific – IMF working paper WP17/90. IMF, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  3. Annis E (2015) Climate change and trade in the Pacific Island countries: The Pacer Plus Agreement, 5 November 2015. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2794759. Accessed 1 Aug 2017
  4. Annis E, Baker C, Lu L (2015) Pacific Agreement on Closer Economic Relations (Pacer) Plus negotiations: dispute settlement mechanism. https://www.tradelab.org. Accessed 1 Aug 2017.
  5. Armstrong H, Read R (2006) Geographical ‘handicaps’ and small states: some implications for the Pacific from a global perspective. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 47(1):79–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Asian Development Bank (2015) The Cook Islands: stronger investment climate for sustainable growth. Asian Development Bank, ManilaGoogle Scholar
  7. Attorney General v Joseph, (2006) CCJ 1 (AJ)Google Scholar
  8. Baehr PR (1975) Small states: a tool for analysis? World Polit 27(3):456–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baird N (2014) Judging as cultural outsiders: exploring the expatriate model of judging in the Pacific. Canterbury Law Rev 19:80–96Google Scholar
  10. Baudenbacher C, Clifton MJ (2015) Courts of regional economic and political integration agreements. In: Romano CPR, Alter K, Shany Y (eds) The Oxford handbook of international adjudication. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 250–277Google Scholar
  11. Berry DS (2014) Caribbean integration law. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bilmoria N (2017) Choices for the South Pacific region’s bar associations and law societies? In: Butler P, Morris C (eds) The world of small states 1, pp 245–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Biukovic L (2008) Dispute resolution mechanisms and regional trade agreements: South American and Caribbean modalities. UC Davis J Int Law Policy 14:255–296Google Scholar
  14. Bola A (2016) Potential for sustainable sea transport: a case study of the Southern Lomaiviti, Fiji Islands. Mar Policy:1–11Google Scholar
  15. Bown CP, McCulloch R (2009) Developing countries, dispute settlement, and the advisory centre on WTO law. Brookings global economy & development working paper 37Google Scholar
  16. Bravo KE (2005) CARICOM, the myth of sovereignty, and aspirational economic integration. N C J Int Law Commer Regul 31(1):145–206Google Scholar
  17. Bravo KE (2011) Challenges to Caribbean economic sovereignty in a globalised world. Mich State Int Law Rev 20(1):33–56Google Scholar
  18. Briguglio L (1995) Small island developing states and their economic vulnerabilities. World Dev 23(9):1615–1632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Briguglio L (2014) A vulnerability and resilience framework for small states. University of Malta, MaltaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Briguglio L, Cordina G, Kisanga E (eds) (2006) Building the economic resilience of small states. Islands and Small States Institute of the University of Malta and the Commonwealth Secretariat, MaltaGoogle Scholar
  21. Briguglio L, Cordina G, Vigilance C (eds) (2010) Profiling vulnerability and resilience: a manual for small states. University of Malta, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Bronckers M (2015) Is investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) superior to litigation before domestic courts? An EU view on bilateral trade agreements. J Int Econ Law 18:655–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Caserta S, Madsen MR (2016) Between community law and common law: the rise of the Caribbean Court of Justice at the intersection of regional integration and post-colonial legacies. Law Contemp Probl 79:89–115Google Scholar
  24. Central Intelligence Agency for the US (2017) Estimates for 2016; The World Factbook. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/resources/the-world-factbook/. Accessed 1 Aug 2017
  25. Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru (Nauru v Australia) (1992) Preliminary Objections, Judgment, ICJ Rep 240Google Scholar
  26. Changsen Y (2014) China’s economic relations with Pacific Island countries. National Center for Oceania Studies, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  27. Chase C, Yanovich A, Crawford J, Ugaz P (2013) Mapping of dispute settlement mechanisms in regional trade agreements – innovative or variations on a theme? Staff working paper ERSD-2013-07. World Trade Organization Economic Research and Statistics DivisionGoogle Scholar
  28. Clapham C (1999) Sovereignty and the third world state. Polit Stud XLVII:522–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Closa C (2016) Government structures and processes in international organisations. In: Closa C, Casini L (eds) Comparative regional integration: governance and legal models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Closa C, Casini L (2016) Preface. In: Closa C, Casini L (eds) Comparative regional integration: governance and legal models. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Commonwealth Secretariat (2017) http://thecommonwealth.org. Accessed 1 Aug 2017
  32. Commonwealth Secretariat/World Bank Joint Task Force on Small States (2000) Small states: meeting challenges in the global economy. Commonwealth Parliamentary Association. http://www.cpahq.org/cpahq/cpadocs/meetingchallengeinglobaleconomyl.pdf. Accessed 1 Aug 2017
  33. Connell J, Conway D (2000) Migration and remittances in island microstates: a comparative perspective on the South Pacific and the Caribbean. Int J Urban Reg Res 24(1):52–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Cooper A, Shaw T (eds) (2009) The diplomacies of small states between vulnerability and resilience. Palgrave Macmillan, UKGoogle Scholar
  35. Corbett J, Veenendaal W (2016) Westminster in small states: comparing the Caribbean and Pacific experience. Contemp Polit 22(4):432–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Craig P, Burca GD (2015) EU law: texts, cases and materials, 6th edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. de Mestral A (2015) The constitutional functions of the Caribbean Court of Justice. McGill J Dispute Resolution 1(2):43–75Google Scholar
  38. Easterly W, Kraay A (1999) Small states, small problems? Research working paper. No. WPS 2139, World BankGoogle Scholar
  39. European Commission (2017) Countries and region: Pacific. http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/regions/pacific/index_en.htm. Accessed 1 Aug 2017
  40. Ewart AM (2007) Small developing states in the WTO: a procedural approach to special and differential treatments through reforms to dispute settlement. Syracuse J Int Law Commerce 35:27–76Google Scholar
  41. Fabry M (2010) Recognizing states: international society and the establishment of new states since 1776. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Fox AB (1959) The power of small states: diplomacy in World War II. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  43. Froese MD (2014) Regional trade agreement and the paradox of dispute settlement. Manchester J Int Econ Law 11(3):367–396Google Scholar
  44. Fry G (2005) ‘Pooled Regional Governance’ in the Island Pacific: lessons from history. In: Chand S (ed) Pacific Islands: regional integration and governance. Asia Pacific Press, pp 91–119Google Scholar
  45. Goetschel L (1998) The foreign and security policy interests of small states in today’s Europe. In: Goetschel L (ed) Small states inside and outside the European Union: interests and policies. Kluwer, Boston, pp 14–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gottwald E (2007) Leveling the playing field: is it time for a legal assistance center for developing nations in investment treaty arbitration? Am Univ Int Law Rev 22:237–275Google Scholar
  47. Gounder N, Prasad BC (2012) Trading preferentially and protection. J Pacific Stud 32:57–64Google Scholar
  48. Hau’ofa E (1994) Our sea of islands. Contemp Pacific 6(1):147–160Google Scholar
  49. Haynes J (2015) Revisiting the Locus Standi of private applicants in judicial review proceedings under CARICOM and EU law: a comparative perspective. Commonw Law Bull 41(1):59–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Higman BW (2010) A concise history of the Caribbean. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hilpold P (2003) Regional integration according to Article XXIV GATT – between law and politics. Max Planck Yearb United Nations Law 7:219–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Holtz A (2011) Australien als Führungsmacht im Pazifik. Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft 2:162–179Google Scholar
  53. Hornbeck J F (2008) CARICOM: challenges and opportunities for Caribbean economic integration congressional research service. Congressional Research Service, Library of CongressGoogle Scholar
  54. Hughes SA, Kamea J (2015) Pacific Islands Trade 2010–2014. Pacific Community (SPC)Google Scholar
  55. Ingadottir T (2015) The financing of international adjudication. In: Romano CPR, Alter KJ, Shany Y (eds) The Oxford handbook of international adjudication. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  56. Jacovides AA (2001) International tribunals: do they really work for small states? N Y Univ J Int Law Polit 34:253–261Google Scholar
  57. Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (2017) Jurisdiction. https://www.jcpc.uk/docs/jurisdiction-of-the-jcpc.pdf. Accessed 1 Aug 2017
  58. Katzenstein PJ (1985) Small states in world markets: industrial policy in Europe. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  59. Kelsey J (2006) ‘Free Trade Agreements – Boon or Bane?’: through the lens of Pacer. Victoria Univ Wellington Law Rev 37:391–419Google Scholar
  60. Keohane RO (1969) Review: Lilliputians’ dilemmas: small states in international politics. Int Organ 23(2):291–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kessie E (2016) Office of the Chief Trade Advisor, Pacific Island Countries. Paper presented at the conference on integration and international dispute resolution in small states, Center for Small States/Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, London, 19–20 May 2016Google Scholar
  62. Khor HE, Kronenberg RP, Tumbarello P (eds) (2016) Resilience and growth in the small states of the Pacific. International Monetary Fund, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  63. Kleinheisterkamp J (2014) Financial responsibility in European International Investment Policy. Int Comp Law Q 63:449–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kocken J, Roozendaal GV (2012) Constructing the Caribbean Court of Justice: how ideas inform institutional choices. Eur Rev Latin Am Caribbean Stud (93):95–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kokott J (2011) States, sovereign equality. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. OPIL. http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1113. Accessed 1 Aug 2017
  66. Kutz J, Nottage L (2015) Investment Treaty Arbitration ‘Down Under’: policy and politics in Australia. ICSID Rev 30(2):465–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lewis P (2007) Bringing small states back in: the Caribbean and Pacific in a new world order. Soc Econ Stud 1:31Google Scholar
  68. Lorde T, Alleyne A, Francis B (2015) An assessment of international competitiveness in CARICOM services exports. Global Econ J 15(4):525–558Google Scholar
  69. Maass M (2009) The elusive definition of the small state. Int Polit 46:65–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. MacCormick N (1993) Beyond the sovereign state. Mod Law Rev 56(1):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Maclellan N (2015) Transforming the regional architecture; new players and challenges for the Pacific Islands. Asia Pacific Issues 118:1–8Google Scholar
  72. Maharajh AN (2014) The Caribbean Court of Justice: a horizontally and vertically comparative study of the Caribbean’s first independent and interdependent court. Cornell Int Law J 47:735–766Google Scholar
  73. Malleson K (2009) Promoting judicial independence in the international courts: lessons from the Caribbean. Int Law Q 58(3):671–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. McCann D (2001) Small states in globalising markets: the end of national economic sovereignty. N Y Univ J Int Law Polit 34(1):281–298Google Scholar
  75. McDonald SA (2015) A true sense of independence: the abolishment of United Kingdom’s influence towards the legal affairs of the commonwealth Caribbean. ILSA J Int Comp Law 22(1):133–154Google Scholar
  76. McElroy JL, Sanborn K (2005) The propensity for dependence in small Caribbean and Pacific Islands. Bank Valetta Rev 31:1–16Google Scholar
  77. Meagher N (2015) Representing developing countries before the WTO: the role of the advisory centre on WTO Law (ACWL). Robert Schuman Centre for advanced studies policy paper 2:9Google Scholar
  78. Melanesian Spearhead Group (2016) Info. http://www.msgsec.info/. Accessed 1 Aug 2017
  79. Mohammed DA (2008) Size and competitiveness: an examination of the CARICOM Single Market and Economy (CSME). Round Table 97:395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Morgan W (2014) Trade negotiations and regional economic integration in the Pacific Islands Forum. Asia Pacific Policy Stud 1(2):325–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Ngangjoh-Hodu Y (2015) Re-constructing dispute settlement mechanism in trade and investment agreements: key considerations for the PACER Plus negotiating parties. Global Trade Customs J 10:291–307Google Scholar
  82. Ntumy MA (1993) South Pacific Islands legal systems. University of Hawaii Press, HawaiiGoogle Scholar
  83. O’Brien D (2009) Accessing the original jurisdiction of the Caribbean Court of Justice. Legal Issues Econ Integration 36(4):339–351Google Scholar
  84. O’Brien D (2011) CARICOM: regional integration in a post-colonial world. Eur Law J 17:630–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Office of the Chief Trade Advisor (2017) General information. http://www.octapic.org/about/general-information/. Accessed 1 Aug 2017
  86. Onguglo BF (1999) Developing countries and trade preferences. In: Mendoza MR, Low P, Kotschwar B (eds) Trade rules in the making: challenges in regional and multilateral negotiations. The Brookings Institution Press/Organization of American States, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  87. PACER Plus Draft Chapters (2016) http://www.bilaterals.org/?pacer-plus-draft-chapters-2013. Accessed 1 Aug 2017
  88. Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat (2017a) Member countries. http://www.forumsec.org/pages.cfm/about-us/our-partners/member-countries/?printerfriendly=true. Accessed 1 Aug 2017
  89. Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat (2017b) PICTA-trade-in-services-protocol. http://www.forumsec.org/pages.cfm/economic-governance/regional-trade-1/picta-trade-in-services-protocol/. Accessed 1 Aug 2017
  90. Pacific Islands Trade & Invest (2016) Trade Statistical Handbook 2016 between China and Forum Island CountriesGoogle Scholar
  91. Pomfret R (2016) Multilateralism and regionalism in the South Pacific: World Trade Organisation and regional fora as complementary institutions for trade facilitation. Asia Pacific Policy Stud 3(3):420–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Radio New Zealand (2016) PACER Plus to go ahead with or without PNG. http://www.radionz.co.nz/international/programmes/datelinepacific/audio/201811332/pacer-plus-to-go-ahead-with-or-without-png. Accessed 1 Aug 2017
  93. Rediker E (2013) Courts of appeal and colonialism in the British Caribbean: a case for the Caribbean Court of Justice. Mich J Int Law 35(1):213–251Google Scholar
  94. Revised Treaty of Chaguaramas 1973Google Scholar
  95. Ro’i L (2013) L’intégration Régionale Océanienne; Enjeux, Contraintes et Perspectives. Université de Bordeaux IV, TalenceGoogle Scholar
  96. Roberts A (2014) State-to-state investment treaty arbitration: a hybrid theory of independent rights and shared interpretive authority. Harv Int Law J 55(1):1–70Google Scholar
  97. Romano CPR, Alter KJ, Shany Y (2015) Mapping international adjudicative bodies, the issues and players. In: Romano CPR, Alter KJ, Shany Y (eds) The Oxford handbook of international adjudication. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3–26Google Scholar
  98. Saiz Arnaiz A, Alcoberro Llivina C (eds) (2013) National constitutional identity and European integration. Intersentia, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  99. Schacherer S (2016) TTP, CETA and TTIP between innovation and consolidation – resolving investor-state disputes under mega-regionals. J Int Dispute Settlement 7:628–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Schunken KR (2008) The advisory centre on WTO law: a success story, but for whom? Law Pract Int Tribunals 7:59–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Súilleabháin AO (2014) Small states at the United Nations: diverse perspectives, shared opportunities. International Peace Institute, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  102. The World Bank (2017a) Small states. http://data.worldbank.org/region/small-states. Accessed 1 Aug 2017
  103. The World Bank (2017b) The World Bank in small states. http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/smallstates. Accessed 1 Aug 2017
  104. Thomas C (2009) Global economic crisis: CARICOM impacts and responses. ECLAC, Caribbean Development Report 2:16Google Scholar
  105. Thorhallsson B, Wivel A (2006) Small states in the European Union: what do we know and what would we like to know? Cambridge Rev Int Aff 19(4):651–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. UN Office of the High Representative for the Least Developed Countries, Landlocked Developing Countries and Small Island Developing States (2017) About Small Island Developing States. http://unohrlls.org/about-sids/. Accessed 1 Aug 2017
  107. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2012) Transparency. UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II, Geneva and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  108. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2017) Small Island Developing States (SIDS). http://unctad.org/en/Pages/ALDC/Small%20Island%20Developing%20States/UN-recognition-of-the-problems-of-small-island-developing-States.aspx. Accessed 1 Aug 2017
  109. Villalta Puig G, Al-Haddab B (2011) The transparency deficit of dispute settlement in the World Trade Organisation. Manchester J Int Econ Law 8(1):2–17Google Scholar
  110. von Tigerstrom B (2005) Small island developing states and international trade: special challenges in the global partnership for development. Melbourne J Int Law 6:402–436Google Scholar
  111. Warner R, Anatol M (2015) Caribbean integration – lessons for the Pacific? Asia Pacific Policy Stud 2(1):183–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Weiler J (2015) European hypocrisy: TTIP and ISDS. EJIL:Talk! EJIL. https://www.ejiltalk.org/european-hypocrisy-ttip-and-isds/. Accessed 1 Aug 2017
  113. Winters LA, Martins PG (2004) When comparative advantage is not enough: business costs in small remote economies. World Trade Rev 3(3):347–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Wolf S (2016a) Die Erforschung von Politik und Recht in Kleinstaat und Monarchie – Eine konzeptionelle Einführung. In: Wolf S (ed) State Size Matters Politik und Recht im Kontext von Kleinstaatlichkeit und Monarchie. Springer, Wiesbaden, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  115. Wolf S (2016b) Governance in small states legislatures – a theoretical framework and the case of Liechtenstein. In: Wolf S (ed) State Size Matters Politik und Recht im Kontext von Kleinstaatlichkeit und Monarchie. Springer, Wiesbaden, pp 83–94Google Scholar
  116. World Trade Organisation (2017) Understanding the WTO – the organization: members and observers. https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/org6_e.htm. Accessed 1 Aug 2017

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLPLondonUK

Personalised recommendations