Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Ecosystem Services from Forest Landscapes pp 89–126Cite as

Sustainable Planning for Peri-urban Landscapes

Abstract

Urban systems keep growing worldwide with different intensities and characters. As a direct consequence, peripheries increase in number, typologies, and complexity, and their growth is highly dependent on local territorial and socioeconomic conditions. Particularly in peri-urban areas, landscapes underwent fast socioeconomic transitions that have deeply modified their territorial assets and land uses. Forests, agricultural and seminatural areas in peri-urban contexts have been affected by processes of urban developments that heavily modify the provision of ecosystem services. Urban development has produced discontinuous and low-density patterns so that outside the main city, the landscape is characterized by a strong fragmentation of farmlands, forests, seminatural areas, and strong mixes of urban and non-urban land uses.

Planning approaches are required to deal with complex drivers of urban and landscape development to achieve a sustainable growth of peri-urban landscapes and maintain the current provision of ecosystem services. This chapter outlines the main characteristics of peri-urban landscapes and introduces a set of planning topics, solutions, and approaches that are under the lens of current applied research of sustainable planning. Examples from recent literature of such approaches are presented, along with a discussion about their potentials, uncertainties, limitations, and trade-offs about the usability and effectiveness in reaching a better level of sustainability.

Keywords

  • Planning
  • Peri-urban
  • Sustainability
  • Urban agriculture
  • Nature-based solutions

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aguiar MR, Sala OE (1999) Patch structure, dynamics and implications for the functioning of arid ecosystems. Trends Ecosyst Evol 14:273–277

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahaiblame L, Engel B, Chaubey I (2012) Effectiveness of low impact development practices: literature review and suggestions for future research. Water Air Soil Pollut 223(7):4253–4273

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Albert C, Aronson J, Fürst C, Opdam P (2014) Integrating ecosystem services in landscape planning: requirements, approaches, and impacts. Landsc Ecol 29:1277–1285

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Allen A (2003) Environmental planning and management of the peri-urban interface: perspectives and emerging field. Environ Urban 15:135–147

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Allmendinger P, Haughton G, Knieling J, Othengrafen F (2015) Soft spaces, planning and emerging practices of territorial governance. In: Allmendinger P, Haughton G, Knieling J, Othengrafen F (eds) Soft spaces in Europe. Re-negotiating governance, boundaries and borders. Routledge, London, pp 3–21

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Aquino FL, Gainza X (2014) Understanding density in an uneven city, Santiago de Chile: implications for social and environmental sustainability. Sustain Basel 6:5876–5897

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Aubry C, Ramamonjiso J, Dabat MH, Rakotoariso J, Rakotondraib J, Rabehariso L (2012) Urban agriculture and land use in cities: an approach with the multi-functionality and sustainability concepts in the case of Antananarivo (Madagascar). Land Use Policy 29:429–439

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Baker DC, Sipe NG, Gleeson BJ (2006) Performance-based planning: perspectives from the United States, Australia, and New Zealand. J Plan Educ Res 25(4):396–409

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Barbedo J, Miguez JM, van der Horst D, Marins M (2014) Enhancing ecosystem services for flood mitigation: a conservation strategy for peri-urban landscapes? Ecol Soc 19(2):54

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Benis K, Ferrão P (2017) Potential mitigation of the environmental impacts of food systems through urban and peri-urban agriculture (UPA)–a life cycle assessment approach. J Clean Prod 140:784–795

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin K, Bouchard A, Domon G (2007) Abandoned farmlands as components of rural landscapes: an analysis of perceptions and representations. Land Urban Plan 83:228–244

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Berke PR, Conroy MM (2000) Are we planning for sustainable development? J Am Plann Assoc 66(1):21–33

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bourne LS (2000) Living on the edge: conditions of marginality in the Canadian urban system. In: Lithwick H, Gradus Y (eds) Developing frontier cities, the GeoJournal Library. Springer, Netherlands, pp 77–97

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers J, Vias AC (2005) Urban, suburban, and exurban sprawl in the Rocky Mountain West: evidence from regional adjustment models. J Reg Sci 45(1):21–48

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cash C (2014) Towards achieving resilience at the rural–urban fringe: the case of Jamestown, South Africa. Urban Forum 25(1):125–141

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Clark JK, Munroe DK (2013) The relational geography of peri-urban farmer adaptation. J Rural Community Dev 8(3):15–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Shacham E, Walters G, Janzen C, Maginnis S (2016) Nature-based solutions to address global societal challenges. IUCN, Gland

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (2006) Thematic strategy for soil protection. www.ec.europa.eu/environment/soil. Accessed 10 May 2017

  • Conedera M, Del Biaggio M, Seeland K, Moretti M, Home R (2015) Residents’ preferences and use of urban and peri-urban green spaces in a Swiss mountainous region of the Southern Alps. Urban For Urban Gree 14:139–147

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Coppola A (2004) An economic perspective on land abandonment processes. Paper presented at the AVEC Workshop on Effects of land abandonment and global change on plant and animal communities, 11–13 Oct 2004, Anacapri, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai D (2011) Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in urban green space accessibility: where to intervene? Landsc Urban Plan 102:234–244

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • de Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L (2010) Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complex 7:260–272

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Deelstra T, Girardet H (2000) Urban agriculture and sustainable cities. In: Bakker N, Dubbeling M, Gundel S, Sabel-Koschela U, de Zeeuw H (eds) Growing cities, growing food: urban agriculture on the policy agenda. Deutsche Stiftung fur Internationale Entwicklung (DSE), Feldafing, pp 43–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra L, Poelman H (2008) Remote rural regions: how proximity to a city influences the performance of rural regions. In: COM—Commission of the European Communities (ed) Regional policy 1/2008. European Commission, Brussels, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Donadieu P (1998) Les Campagnes Urbaines. Actes Sud, Arles

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorning MA, Koch J, Shoemaker DA, Meentemeyer RK (2015) Simulating urbanization scenarios reveals tradeoffs between conservation planning strategies. Landsc Urban Plan 136:28–39

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • DTLR (Department for Transport Local Government and the Regions) (2002) Improving urban parks, play areas and green spaces. Improving Urban Parks, Play Areas, London

    Google Scholar 

  • EEA (European Environmental Agency) (2006) Urban sprawl in Europe The ignored challenge. Report 10. EEA, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • EEA (European Environmental Agency) (2015) State of the environment report. EEA, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • EUROSTAT (2010) Regional yearbook 2010. Chapter 15: a revised urban–rural typology. EUROSTAT, Luxemburg, pp 240–253

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2002) Urban and peri-urban forestry sub-programme: strategic framework for the Biennium 2002–2003 and mid- term 2002–2007. FAO FORC, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher TD, Shuster W, Hunt WF, Ashley R, Butler D, Scott A, Trowsdale S, Barraud S, Semadeni-Daves A, Bertrand-Krajewski JL, Mikkelsen PS, Rivard G, Uhl M, Dagenais D, Viklander M (2014) SUDS, LIDS, BMs, WUDS and more – the evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage. Urban Water J 12(7):525–542

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics. The ecology of landscapes and regions. University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest M, Konijnendijk CC, Randrup TB (eds) (1999) COST action E12-Research and Development in urban forestry in Europe. Official Printing Office of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster J (2014) Hiding in plain view: vacancy and prospect in Paris’ Petite Ceinture. Cities 40:124–132

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann J (1987) Planning in the public domain: from knowledge to action. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Fürst C, Opdam P, Inostroza L, Luque S (2014) A balance score card tool for assessing how successful the ecosystem services concept is applied in participatory land use planning. Landsc Ecol 29:1435–1446

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gallent N, Shaw D (2007) Spatial planning, area action plans and the rural next urban fringe. J Environ Plan Manag 50:617–638

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gallent N, Andersson J, Bianconi M (2006) Planning on the edge : the context for planning at the rural-urban fringe. Routledge, Abingdon

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gant RL, Robinson GM, Shahab Fazal S (2011) Land-use change in the ‘edgelands’: policies and pressures in London’s rural-urban fringe. Land Use Policy 28:266–279

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Geneletti D (2013) Ecosystem services in environmental impact assessment and strategic environmental assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 40:1–2

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Geneletti D, La Rosa D, Spyra M, Cortinovis C (2017) A review of approaches and challenges for sustainable planning in urban peripheries. Landsc Urban Plan 165:231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.01.013

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gill SE, Handley JF, Ennos AR, Pauleit S, Theuray N, Lindley SJ (2008) Characterising the urban environment of UK cities and towns: a template for landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plan 87:210–222

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Goldthau A (2014) Rethinking the governance of energy infrastructure: scale, decentralization and polycentrism. Energy Res Soc Sci 1/0:134–140

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Goodling E, Green J, McClintock N (2015) Uneven development of the sustainable city: shifting capital in Portland, Oregon. Urban Geogr 36(4):504–527

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gret-Regamey A, Altwegg J, Sirén EA, van Strien MJ, Weibel B (2016) Integrating ecosystem services into spatial planning—a spatial decision support tool. Landsc Urban Plann 165:206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.003

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Haase D, Larondelle N, Andersson E, Artmann M, Borgström S, Breuste J, Gomez-Baggethun E, Gren A, Hamstead Z, Hansen R, Kabisch K, Kremer P, Langemeyer J, Rall E, McPhearson T, Pauleit S, Qureshi S, Schwarz N, Voigt A, Wurster D, Elmqvist T (2014) A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: concepts, models, and implementation. Ambio 43:413–433

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Haller A (2014) The “sowing of concrete”: peri-urban smallholder perceptions of rural–urban land change in the Central Peruvian Andes. Land Use Policy 38:239–247

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hara Y, Murakami A, Tsuchiya K, Palijon AM, Yokohari M (2013) A quantitative assessment of vegetable farming on vacant lots in an urban fringe area in Metro Manila: can it sustain long-term local vegetable demand? Appl Geogr 41:195–206

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Harman BP, Choy DL (2011) Perspectives on tradable development rights for ecosystem service protection: lessons from an Australian peri-urban region. J Environ Plann Manag 54(5):617–635

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hedblom M, Andersson E, Borgströmc S (2017) Flexible land-use and undefined governance: from threats to potentials in peri-urban landscape planning. Land Use Policy 63:523–527

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Heimlich RE (1989) Metropolitan agriculture: farming in the city’s shadow. J Am Plann Assoc 55:457–466

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe L, Marks G (2003) Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. Am Polit Sci Rev 97(2):233–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough M (2004) Cities and natural process: a basis for sustainability. Routledge, New York

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MP (2001) Environmental impacts of urban sprawl: a survey of the literature and proposed research agenda. Environ Plann A 33:717–735

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kline JD, Thiers P, Ozawa CP, Alan Yeakley J, Gordon SN (2014) How well has land-use planning worked under different governance regimes? A case study in the Portland, OR-Vancouver, WA metropolitan area, USA. Landsc Urban Plann 131:51–63

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Konijnendijk CC (2003) A decade of urban forestry in Europe. Forest Policy Econ 5:173–186

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Korthals Altes WK, van Rij E (2013) Planning the horticultural sector. Managing greenhouse sprawl in the Netherlands. Land Use Policy 31:486–497

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • La Greca P, La Rosa D, Martinico F, Privitera R (2011) Agricultural and green infrastructures: the role of non-urbanised areas for eco-sustainable planning in a metropolitan region. Environ Pollut 159:2193–2202

    CrossRef  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • La Rosa D (2014) Accessibility to greenspaces: GIS based indicators for sustainable planning in a dense urban context. Ecol Indic 42:122–134

    Google Scholar 

  • La Rosa D, Privitera R (2013) Characterization of non-urbanized areas for land-use planning of agricultural and green infrastructure in urban context. Landsc Urban Plann 109:94–106

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • La Rosa D, Barbarossa L, Privitera R, Martinico F (2014) Agriculture and the city: a method for sustainable planning of new forms of agriculture in urban contexts. Land Use Policy 41:290–303

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lee Y-C, Ahern J, Chia-Tsung Yeh C-T (2015) Ecosystem services in peri-urban landscapes: the effects of agricultural landscape change on ecosystem services in Taiwan’s western coastal plain. Landsc Urban Plann 139:137–148

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Leichenko RM, Solecki WD (2008) Consumption, inequity, and environmental justice: the making of new metropolitan landscapes in developing countries. Soc Nat Resour 21:611–624

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lindley SJ, Handley JF, Theuray N, Peet E, Mcevoy D (2006) Adaptation strategies for climate change in the urban environment: assessing climate change related risk in UK urban areas. J Risk Res 9:543–568

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lörzing H (2006) Reinventing suburbia in The Netherlands. Built Environ 32(3):298–310. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.32.3.298

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Loupa Ramos I, Ferreiro M, Colaço C, Santos S (2013) Peri-urban landscapes in metropolitan areas: using transdisciplinary research to move towards an improved conceptual and geographical understanding. In: proceeding of the AESOP-ACSP joint congress, 15–19 July 2013, Dublin, p 1145. Available at http://aesop-acspdublin2013.com/uploads/files/AESOP_Programme_final.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2017

  • Martinico F, La Rosa D, Privitera R (2014) Green oriented urban development for urban ecosystem services provision in a medium sized city in southern Italy. iForest 7:385–395. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1171-007

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mason RJ, Nigmatullina L (2011) Suburbanization and sustainability in metropolitan Moscow. Geogr Rev 101(3):316–333

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meeus S, Gulinck H (2008) Semi-urban areas in landscape research: a review. Living Rev Landsc Res 2:1–45

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Miguez MG, Mascarenhas F, Canedo de Magalhães L, D’Alterio C (2009) Planning and design of urban flood control measures: assessing effects combination. J Urban Plann Dev 135(3):100–109

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RW (1997) Urban forestry: planning and managing urban green spaces, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JD, Kim H, Kjeldsen TR, Packman J, Grebby S, Dearden R (2014) Assessing the impact of urbanization on storm runoff in a peri-urban catchment using historical change in impervious cover. J Hydrol 515:59–70

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Moreira F, Fontes I, Dias S, Batista e Silva J, Loupa-Ramos I (2016) Contrasting static versus dynamic-based typologies of land cover patterns in the Lisbon metropolitan area: towards a better understanding of peri-urban areas. Appl Geogr 75:49–59

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Moss T, Newig J (2010) Multilevel water governance and problems of scale: setting the stage for a broader debate. Environ Manag 46(1):1–6

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Munoz F (2003) Lock living: urban sprawl in Mediterranean cities. Cities 20(6):381–385

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Neuvonen M, Sievänen T, Tönnes S, Koskela T (2007) Access to green areas and the frequency of visits—a case study in Helsinki. Urban For Urban Gree 6:235–247

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak DJ, Crane DE, Stevens JC (2006) Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban For Urban Gree 4:115–123

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien K, Sygna L, Haugen JE (2004) Vulnerable or resilient a multi-scale assessment of climate impacts and vulnerability in Norway. Clim Change 64:193–225

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien L, DeVreese R, Kern M, Sievanen T, Stojanova B, Atmis E (2017) Cultural ecosystem benefits of urban and peri-urban green infrastructure across different European countries. Urban For Urban Gree 24:236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.03.002

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2002) Redefining territories: the functional regions. Organisation for economic co-operation and development (OECD), Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Opdam P, Albert C, Fürst C, Gret-Regamey A, Kleemann J, Parker DC, La Rosa D, Schmidt K, Villamor GB, Walz A (2015) Ecosystem services for connectingactors – lessons from a symposium. CASES – Change Adapt Soc Ecol Syst 2:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Padeiro M (2016) Conformance in land-use planning: the determinants of decision, conversion and transgression. Land Use Policy 55:285–299

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Padgham J, Jabbour J, Dietrich K (2015) Managing change and building resilience: a multi-stressor analysis of urban and peri-urban agriculture in Africa and Asia. Urban Climate 12:183–204

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pappalardo V, Campisano A, Martinico F, Modica C (2016) Supporting urban development master plans by hydraulic invariance concept: the case study of Acquicella catchment. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference Novatech, Lyon, July 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Pappalardo V, La Rosa D, La Greca P, Campisano A (2017) The potential of GI application in urban runoff control for land use management: a preliminary evaluation from a southern Italy case study. Ecosyst Serv., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.04.015 26:345

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Patz JA, Campbell-Lendrum D, Holloway T, Foley JA (2005) Impact of regional climate change on human health. Nature 438(7066):310–317

    CrossRef  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paül V, McKenzie FH (2013) Peri-urban farmland conservation and development of alternative food networks: insights from a case-study area in metropolitan Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain). Land Use Policy 30:94–105

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Piorr A, Ravetz J, Tosics I (2011) Peri-urbanisation in Europe: towards a European policy to sustain urban-rural futures. University of Copenhagen – Academic Books Life Sciences, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Provè C, Dessein J, de Krom M (2016) Taking context into account in urban agriculture governance: case studies of Warsaw (Poland) and Ghent (Belgium). Land Use Policy 56:16–26

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pugnare FI, Lazaro R (2000) Seed bank and understorey species composition in a semi-arid environment: the effect of shrub age and rainfall. Ann Bot London 86:807–813

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pulighe G, Fava F, Lupia F (2016) Insights and opportunities from mapping ecosystem services of urban green spaces and potentials in planning. Ecosyst Serv 22:1–10

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Santiago LE, Villanueva-Cubero L, Santiago-Acevedo LE, Rodriguez-Melendez YN (2014) Green area loss in San Juan’s inner-ring suburban neighborhoods: a multidisciplinary approach to analyzing green/gray area dynamics. Ecol Soc 19(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauws W, de Roo G (2011) Exploring transitions in the peri-urban area. Plan Theory Pract 12(2):269–284

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Roose A, Kull A, Gauk M, Tali T (2013) Land use policy shocks in the post-communist urban fringe: a case study of Estonia. Land Use Policy 30(1):76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.02.008

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ros-Tonen M, Pouw N, Bavinck M (2015) Governing beyond cities: the urban-rural interface. In: Gupta J, Pfeffer K, Verrest H, Ros-Tonen M (eds) Geographies of urban governance. Advanced theories, methods and practices. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 85–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupprecht CD, Byrne JA, Ueda H, Lo AY (2015) It’s real, not fake like a park’: residents’ perception and use of informal urban green-space in Brisbane, Australia and Sapporo, Japan. Landsc Urban Plann 143:205–218

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan S, Throgmorton J (2003) Sustainable transportation and land development on the periphery: a case study of Freiburg, Germany and Chula Vista, California. Transportation Res D-Tr E 8:37–52

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Salet W, Savini F (2015) The political governance of urban peripheries. Environ Plann C 33(3):448–456

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Salet W, Vermeulen R, Savini F, Dembski S, Thierstein A, Nears P, Vink B, Healey P, Stein U, Schultz H, Salet W, Vermeulen R, Savini F, Dembski F (2015) Planning for the new European metropolis: functions, politics, and symbols/metropolitan regions: functional relations between the core and the periphery/business investment decisions and spatial planning policy/metropolitan challenges, political responsibilities/spatial imaginaries, urban dynamics and political community/capacity-building in the city region: creating common spaces/which challenges for today’s European metropolitan spaces? Plann Theory Pract 16:251–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2015.1021574

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schipperijn J, Ekholm O, Stigsdotter UK, Toftager M, Bentsen P, Kamper-Jørgensen F, Randrup TB (2010) Factors influencing the use of green space: results from a Danish national representative survey. Landsc Urban Plann 95:130–137

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Shkaruba A, Kireyeu V, Likhacheva O (2017) Rural–urban peripheries under socioeconomic transitions: changing planning contexts, lasting legacies, and growing pressure. Landsc Urban Plann.: dx.doi.org 165:244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.006

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Smith A (2007) Emerging in between: the multi-level governance of renewable energy in the English regions. Energy Policy 35(12):6266–6280

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sugiyama T, Leslie E, Giles-Corti B, Owen N (2008) Association of neighbourhood greenness with physical and mental health: do walking, social coherence and local social interaction explain the relationship? J Epidemiol Commun H 62(5):e9

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swanwick C (2009) Society’s attitudes to and preferences for land and landscape. Land Use Policy 26:S62–S75

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Swinton SM, Lupi F, Robertson GP, Hamilton SK (2007) Ecosystem services and agriculture: cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits. Ecol Econ 64:245–252

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tan Z, Zhang F, Rotunno R, Snyder C (2004) Mesoscale predictability of moist baroclinic waves: experiments with parameterized convection. J Atmos Sci 61:1794–1804

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor Lovell S (2010) Multifunctional urban agriculture for sustainable land use planning in the United States. Sustain 2:2499–2522

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Terres JM, Nisini Scacchiafichi L, Wania A, Ambar M, Anguiano E, Buckwell E, Coppola A, Gocht A, Nordström Källström H, Pointereau P, Strijker D, Visek L, Vranken L, Zobena A (2015) Farmland abandonment in Europe: identification of drivers andindicators, and development of a composite indicator of risk. Land Use Policy 49:20–34

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • The Sierra Club (1999) The dark side of the American dream: The costs and consequences of suburban sprawl. Available at http:// http://www.sierraclub.org/sprawl/report98/report.asp

  • Thompson A, Stalker Prokopy L (2009) Tracking urban sprawl: using spatial data to inform farmland preservation policy. Land Use Policy 26:194–202

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Todes A (2004) Regional planning and sustainability: limits and potentials of South Africa’s integrated development plans. J Environ Plann Manag 47(6):843–861

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tu G, Abildtrup J, Serge Garcia S (2016) Preferences for urban green spaces and peri-urban forests: an analysis of stated residential choices. Landsc Urban Plann 148:120–131

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tzoulas K, Korpela K, Venn S, Yli-Pelkonen V, Kazmierczak A, Niemela J, James P (2007) Promoting ecosystems and human health using green infrastructure: a literature review. Landsc Urban Plann 81:167–178

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Van Herzele A, Wiedemann T (2003) A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces. Landsc Urban Plann 63:109–126

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Van Herzele A, De Clercq EM, Wiedemann T (2005) Strategic planning for new woodlands in the urban periphery: through the lens of social inclusiveness. Urban For Urban Gree 3:177–188

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vejre H, Søndergaard Jensen F, Jellesmark Thorsen B (2010) Demonstrating the importance of intangible ecosystem services from peri-urban landscapes. Ecol Complex 7:338–348

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Webber S, Hanna K (2014) Sustainability and suburban housing in the Toronto region: the case of the Oak Ridges Moraine conservation plan. J Urban Int Res Placemaking Urban Sustain 7(3):245–260

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Westerink J, Haase D, Bauer A, Perpar A, Grochowski M, Ravetz J, Jarrige F, Aalbers C (2013) Dealing with sustainability trade-offs of the compact city in peri-urban planning across European city regions. Eur Plan Stud 21:473–497

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehand JWR (1988) Urban fringe belts: development of an idea. Plan Perspect 3:47–58

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff SC, BenDor TK (2016) Ecosystem services in urban planning: comparative paradigms and guidelines for high quality plans. Landsc Urban Plann 152:90–100

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Hao P, Liu W, Cai J (2016) Peri-urban agricultural development in Beijing: varied forms, innovative practices and policy implications. Habitat Int 56:222–234

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zasada I (2011) Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture-a review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming. Land Use Policy 28:639–648

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zasada I, Loibl W, Berges R, Steinnocher K, Koestl M, Piorr A, Werner A (2013) Rural-urban regions: a spatial approach to define urban-rural relationships in Europe. In: Nilsson K, Pauleit S, Bell S, Aalbers C, Nielsen TAS (eds) Peri-urban futures: scenarios ad models for land use change in Europe. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 45–68

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zezza A, Tasciotti L (2010) Urban agriculture, poverty, and food security: empirical evidence from a sample of developing countries. Food Policy 35:265–273

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman J (2001) The “nature” of urbanism on the new urbanist frontier: sustainable development, or defense of the suburban dream? Urban Geogr 22(3):249–267

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Žlender V, Ward Thompson C (2017) Accessibility and use of peri-urban green space for inner-city dwellers: a comparative study. Landsc Urban Plann 165:193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.06.011

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Catania, Catania, Italy

    Daniele La Rosa

  2. Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, University of Trento, Trento, Italy

    Davide Geneletti

  3. Institute for Geosciences and Geography, Dept. Sustainable Landscape Development, Martin Luther University Halle, Halle, Germany

    Marcin Spyra & Christine Fürst

  4. Institute of Environmental Planning, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany

    Christian Albert

Authors
  1. Daniele La Rosa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Davide Geneletti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marcin Spyra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christian Albert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Christine Fürst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniele La Rosa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Ontario Forest Research Institute, Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada

    Ajith H. Perera

  2. Institute of Forestry and Rural Engineering, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia

    Urmas Peterson

  3. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina

    Guillermo Martínez Pastur

  4. Northern Institute of Applied Climate Science Northern Research Station, US Forest Service, Delaware, Ohio, USA

    Dr. Louis R. Iverson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

La Rosa, D., Geneletti, D., Spyra, M., Albert, C., Fürst, C. (2018). Sustainable Planning for Peri-urban Landscapes. In: Perera, A., Peterson, U., Pastur, G., Iverson, L. (eds) Ecosystem Services from Forest Landscapes. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74515-2_5

Download citation

search

Navigation