A Ubiquitous Students Responses System for Connected Classrooms

  • Aimad Karkouch
  • Hajar Mousannif
  • Hassan Al Moatassime
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 37)


Receiving feedbacks from students about their learning experience is a key part of any pedagogical approach. Students’ feedbacks could be retrieved in a variety of ways using various Students Response Systems (SRS). A major drawback of existing SRS is their lack of seamless integration into learning environments. As such, they become a potential source of distraction for the learning process. We believe technology should blind seamlessly and provide support for pedagogy, thus, we propose a Ubiquitous Students Responses System (U-SRS) that is capable of continuously and seamlessly monitoring various students’ learning performances features, making sense of them and providing insights for teachers, enabling them to adapt their pedagogical approach according to their students immediate needs. The proposed U-SRS takes advantages of machine learning and the Internet of Things paradigm to enable its services in connected classrooms. We present our solution’s design and describe its architecture. We select a subset of relevant features, collected by connected objects, and used by machine learning algorithms to build learning performance predictive models. Finally, we highlight the advantages of U-SRS over exiting SRS solutions.


Students Responses System Students feedback Internet of Things Machine learning 



The work of A. Karkouch leading to these results has received funding from the Moroccan National Center for Scientific and Technical Research under the grant N° 18UCA2015.


  1. 1.
    Mory, E.H.: Feedback research revisited. Handb. Res. Educ. Commun. Technol. 2, 745–784 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Draper, S.W., Brown, M.I.: Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 20(2), 81–94 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gauci, S.A., Dantas, A.M., Williams, D.A., Kemm, R.E.: Promoting student-centered active learning in lectures with a personal response system. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 33(1), 60–71 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beatty, I.D.: Transforming student learning with classroom communication systems. Educ. Appl. Res. 2004(3), 1–13 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    FitzPatrick, K.A., Finn, K.E., Campisi, J.: Effect of personal response systems on student perception and academic performance in courses in a health sciences curriculum. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 35(3), 280–289 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kort, B., Reilly, R., Picard, R.W.: An affective model of interplay between emotions and learning: reengineering educational pedagogy-building a learning companion. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2001, pp. 43–46, February 2001Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Denker, K.J.: Student response systems and facilitating the large lecture basic communication course: assessing engagement and learning. Commun. Teach. 27(1), 50 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Teevan, J., Liebling, D., Paradiso, A., Suarez, C.G.J., von Veh, C., Gehring, D.: Displaying mobile feedback during a presentation. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services - MobileHCI 2012, p. 379 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leong, C.K., Lee, Y.H., Mak, W.K.: Mining sentiments in SMS texts for teaching evaluation. Expert Syst. Appl. 39(3), 2584–2589 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Altrabsheh, N., Cocea, M., Fallahkhair, S.: Predicting learning-related emotions from students’ textual classroom feedback via Twitter. In: 8th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, pp. 436–439 (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Altrabsheh, N., Gaber, M.M., Cocea, M.: SA-E: Sentiment analysis for education. Front. Artif. Intell. Appl. 255, 353–362 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Calvo, R.A., Kim, S.M.: Sentiment analysis in student experiences of learning. In: Third International Conference on Educational Data Mining, pp. 111–120 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Feng, T., Qinghua, Z., Ruomeng, Z., Tonghao, C., Xinyan, J.: Can E-learner’s emotion be recognized from interactive Chinese texts? In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computers Supported Cooperative Work in Design, CSCWD 2009, pp. 546–551 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., Perry, R.P.: Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: a program of qualitative and quantitative research. Adult Learn. 18(2), 19 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Craig, S., Graesser, A., Sullins, J., Gholson, B.: Affect and learning: an exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with AutoTutor. J. Educ. Media 29(3), 241–250 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    D’Mello, S., Graesser, A., Picard, R.W.: Toward an affect-sensitive autotutor. IEEE Intell. Syst. 22(4), 53–61 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stein, N.L., Levine, L.J., Stein, N.L., Leventhal, B., Trabasso, T.: Making sense out of emotion: the representation and use of goal-structured knowledge. Psychol. Biol. approach. Emot. 45–73 (1990)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aimad Karkouch
    • 1
  • Hajar Mousannif
    • 2
  • Hassan Al Moatassime
    • 1
  1. 1.FSTGCadi Ayyad UniversityMarrakechMorocco
  2. 2.FSSMCadi Ayyad UniversityMarrakechMorocco

Personalised recommendations