Advertisement

Simultaneous Removal of High Nitrate and Phosphate from Synthetic Waste Water by Prolonged Anoxic Cycle in a Batch Reactor

  • Jyotsnarani Jena
  • Trupti Das
Chapter
Part of the Water Science and Technology Library book series (WSTL, volume 84)

Abstract

Phosphorus, as well as nitrate, is an essential nutrient for different agricultural activities, but its excess disposals and discharges into natural water sources result in eutrophication. This leads to water quality problems including increased purification costs, interference with the recreational and conservation value of water bodies. In the current study, attempts have been made to remove nutrients from synthetic wastewater using activated sludge under anoxic condition. Enhanced biological nutrient removal is an efficient and sustainable biological technology to remove overall COD from wastewater. It is based on the enrichment of activated sludge with phosphorous accumulating organisms (PAOs) and denitrifying phosphate accumulating organisms (DNPAOs) by introducing alternating anoxic and aerobic conditions, which favour specific bacterial growth over ordinary heterotrophic organisms. In a small reactor, anoxic condition prevails throughout the working time (24 h). In this reactor, the removal rate of phosphate and nitrate is ~75 and >90% respectively. Metagenomic analysis of the sludge confirmed the presence of DNPAOs in the anaerobic reactor. These metagenomic studies further confirmed the presence of DNPAOs. These DNPAOs removed high amount of nutrient in the presence of an optimum amount of carbon source in anaerobic condition using nitrate as electron acceptor.

Keywords

DNPAOs COD Nitrate Phosphate 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to the Director, IMMT, Bhubaneswar for his encouragement and to DST, New-Delhi for financial support.

References

  1. Ahn J, Daidou T, Tusenda S, Hirata A (2002) Transformation of phosphorous and relevant intracellular compounds by a phosphorous accumulating enrichment culture in the presence of both electron acceptor and electron donor. Biotechnol Bioeng 79:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Public Health Association (APHA) (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water, 17th edn. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Bortone G, Libelli SM, Tilche A, Wanner J (1999) Anoxic phosphate uptake in the DEPHANOX process. Water Sci Technol 40:177–185Google Scholar
  4. Carrera J, Vicent T, Lafuente J (2004) Effect of influent COD/N ratio on biological nitrogen removal (BNR) from high-strength ammonium industrial waste water. Process Biochem 39:2035–2041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hascoet MC, Florentz M (1985) Influence of nitrate on biological phosphorous removal from waste water. Water SA 11:1–8Google Scholar
  6. Metcalf & Eddy (1979) Waste water Engineering: treatment disposal reuse, 2nd ednGoogle Scholar
  7. Murnleitner E, Kuba T, van Loosdrecht MCM, Heijnen JJ (1997) An integrated metabolic model for the aerobic and denitrifying biological phosphorus removal. Biotechnol Bioeng 54:434–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Yuana L, Zhangb C, Zhangb Y, Dingb Y, Xi D (2008) Biological nutrient removal using an alternating of anoxic and anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AAAM) process. Desalination 221:566–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CSIR-Institute of Minerals and Materials TechnologyBhubaneswarIndia

Personalised recommendations