Advertisement

Aerobic Degradation of Complex Organic Compounds and Cyanides in Coke Oven Wastewater in Presence of Glucose

  • Naresh Kumar Sharma
  • Ligy Philip
  • B. S. Murty
Chapter
Part of the Water Science and Technology Library book series (WSTL, volume 84)

Abstract

This study aims at determining the degradation aspect of pollutants from coke oven effluents such as phenols, aromatic hydrocarbons, and cyanide by aerobic mixed culture. Enriched mixed culture was developed from the sludge collected from aeration tank of a sewage treatment plant by serial enrichment technique. The acclimatized culture was able to degrade phenol, cresol, xylenol, quinoline, indole, and cyanide individually, for their concentrations usually found in coke oven wastewater. Xylenol and indole with concentrations above 250 mg/L were highly recalcitrant for biodegradation. A co-substrate such as glucose (1000 mg/L) had an adverse effect on the biodegradation of all the above pollutants; the degradation time was extended with the increase in the concentration of pollutant, although glucose was completely oxidized independent of the pollutant concentration. Biodegradation during mixed pollutant (100 mg/L of each organic compound) conditions were tested in presence of glucose (1000 mg/L) and glucose (1000 mg/L) with cyanide (2.5 mg/L). Aerobic microbes showed increased substrate affinity in the following order phenol > cresol > quinoline > indole > xylenol. The COD at the end of the experiment was found to be less than 0.5 mg/L showing no accumulation of intermediates. In the presence of glucose (1000 mg/L) and cyanide (2.5 mg/L), the lag phase for microbial growth was increased by several days and cyanide was found to be oxidized before the organic pollutants. Xylenol was highly recalcitrant during this experiment and was not degraded even after 20 days. The experimental results highlight the effect of high concentration of co-substrate (1000 mg/L) and the combined toxic influence of cyanide and organics on the microbes treating coke oven wastewater. These results and the ongoing work are aimed at developing high-rate bioreactors for efficient treatment of phenolics, aromatic hydrocarbons, and cyanide-containing wastes emanating from industrial activities.

Keywords

Activated sludge Glucose Cyanide Phenolics Heterocyclic aromatics 

References

  1. Acuna-Arguelles ME, Olguin-lora P, Razo-Flores E (2003) Toxicity and kinetic parameters of the aerobic biodegrdation of the phenol and alkyl phenols by a mixed culture. Biotech Lett 25:559–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Public Health Association (APHA) (1985) Standards methods for examination of water and wastewater. American water works association, water pollution control federation (15), Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Bai Y, Sun Q, Zhao C, Wen D, Tang X (2009) Simultaneous biodegradation of pyridine and quinoline by two mixed bacterial strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 82(5):963–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bai Y, Sun Q, Zhao C, Wen D (2010) Bioaugmentation treatment for coking wastewater containing pyridine and quinoline in a sequencing batch reactor, 1943–1951Google Scholar
  5. Chakraborti S, Veeramani H (2005) Anerobic-anoxic-aerobic sequential degradation of synthetic wastewaters. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 102–103:443–451Google Scholar
  6. Chen CY, Kao CM, Chen SC (2008) Application of Klebsiella oxytoca immobilized cells on the treatment of cyanide wastewater. Chemosphere 71:133–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fetzner S (1998) Bacterial degradation of pyridine, indole, quinoline and their derivatives under different redox conditions. Appl Microbial biotechnol 49:237–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ghose MK (2002) Phyisco chemical treatment as an suitable option for treatment of coke plant effluents. IE (I) J-CH 84:1–6Google Scholar
  9. Haritash AK, Kaushik CP (2009) Biodegradation aspects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (pahs). J Hazard Mater 169(1–3):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haghighi-Podeh MR, Siyahati-Ardakani G (2000) Fate and toxic effects of cyanide on aerobic treatment systems. Water Sci Technol 42:125–129Google Scholar
  11. Huiatt JL, Kerrigan JE, Olson FA, Potter GL (1983) Cyanide from mineral processing. In: Proceedings of Workshop Sponsored by National Science Foundation, USBM & Industry. Salt Lake City, UT Utah Mining and Mineral Resources, Research InstituteGoogle Scholar
  12. Jianlong W, Quian X, Libo W, Yi Q, Werner H (2002) Bioaugumentation as a tool to enhance removal of refractory compounds in coke plant wastewater. Process Biochem 38:777–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lai P, Zhao H, Ye Z, Ni J (2008) Assessing the effectiveness of treating coking effluents using anerobic and aerobic biofilms. Process Biochem 43:229–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li W, Zheng SK (2004) A combination of anaerobic and aerobic treatment for ammonia-laden coke plant effluent: the pilot study. Environ Inform Arch 2:602–610Google Scholar
  15. Lowry OH, Rosenbrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275Google Scholar
  16. Maranon E, Vazquez I, Rodriguez R, Castrillon L, Fernandez Y (2008) Coke wastewater treatment by a three step activated sludge system. Water Air Soil Pollut 192:155–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. O’Connor OA, Young LY (1996) Effects of six different functional groups and their position on the bacterial metabolism of monosubstituted phenols under anaerobic conditions. Environ Sci Technol 30(5):1419–1428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pal P, Kumar R (2014) Treatment of coke wastewater: a critical review for developing sustainable management strategies. Sep Purif Rev 43(2):89–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Papanastasiou AC (1982) Kinetics of biodegradation of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetate in presence of glucose. Biotechnol Bioeng 24:2001–2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Qi R, Yang K, Yu Z (2007) Treatment of cokes plant wastewater by SND fixed biofilm hybrid system. J Environ Sci 19:153–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Saravanan P, Pakshirajan K, Saha P (2008) Growth kinetics of an indigenous mixed microbial consortium during phenol degradation in a batch reactor. Biores Technol 99:205–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Satsangee R, Ghosh P (1990) Anaerobic degradation of phenol using an acclimated mixed culture. Appl Microbial Biotechnol 34:127–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Semple KT, Cain RB (1997) Degradation of phenol and its methylated homolouges by Ochromonas dancia. FEMS Microbiol Lett 152:133–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sharma NK, Philip L, Murty Bhallamudi S (2012) Aerobic degradation of phenolics and aromatic hydrocarbons in presence of cyanide. Biores Technol 121:263–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tamer E, Amin MA, Ossam ET, Bo M, Benoit G (2006) Biological treatment of industrial wastes in photobioreactor. Water Sci Technol 53(1):117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhao WT, Xia Z, Lee DJ (2009) Enhanced treatment of coke plant wastewater using anaerobic anoxic-aerobic membrane bioreactor system. Sep Purif Technol 66:279–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang M, Tay JH, Quian Y, Gu YS (1998) Coke plant wastewater treatment by fixed biofilm system for COD and NH3-N removal. Water Res 32(2):519–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Naresh Kumar Sharma
    • 1
  • Ligy Philip
    • 2
  • B. S. Murty
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BiotechnologyKalasalingam Academy of Research and EducationKrishnankoilIndia
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of TechnologyMadrasIndia

Personalised recommendations