A Festival for Frustrated Egos: The Rise of Trump from an Early Frankfurt School Critical Theory Perspective



This chapter combines the insights of Sigmund Freud and Theodor W. Adorno to explain some of the psychoanalytic mechanisms that contributed to a scenario where people voted for a leader who undermines their very existence. Trump successfully exploited feelings of failure of the millions of Americans who have not been able to live up to the liberal capitalist ideology of success. By replacing their ego ideal with that of their leader, Trump voters could get rid of the frustration and discontent that are generated by such an ideology. The people “fell in love” with Trump, because he provided them with the illusion that they “can become great again”. Moreover, by lifting moral restrictions to being openly classist, racist and sexist, Trump generated a permanent festival where the American people can feel themselves as being better than classed, raced and gendered Others, and thus satisfied with themselves again.


Early Frankfurt School egoEgo Margarete Mitscherlich Fascist Propaganda Trump Supporters 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abromeit, John. 2016. Critical Theory and the Persistence of Right-Wing Populism. Logos 15 (2–3)
  2. ———. 2017. Right-Wing Populism and the Limits of Normative Critical Theory. Logos 16: 1–2. Scholar
  3. Adorno, Theodor W. 2002. Freudian Theory and the Pattern of Fascist Propaganda. In The Culture Industry, ed. Jay Bernstein, 132–157. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Freud, Sigmund. 1989a. Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego. Trans. James Strachey. London/New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 1989b. Totem and Taboo: Some Points of Agreement between the Mental Lives of Savages and Neurotics. Trans. James Strachey. London/New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  6. Gandesha, Samir. 2017. The Neoliberal Personality. Logos 16 (1).
  7. Horkheimer, Max and Adorno, Theodor W. 2002. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Trans. John Cumming. New York: Continuum Press.Google Scholar
  8. Mitscherlich, Alexander and Mitscherlich, Margarete. 1975. The Inability to Mourn: Principles of Collective Behavior. Trans. B. R. Placzek. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Washington State UniversityPullmanUSA

Personalised recommendations