Skip to main content

Uncivil Society: Hegel, Kojève, and the Crisis of Political Legitimacy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Trump and Political Philosophy

Abstract

Dissatisfaction with “the neoliberal policy consensus” has fueled the rise of “populist” parties and candidates around the world, Donald Trump being the foremost example. But what underlies this discontent? Hegel’s understanding of civil society and its proper relationship to the family and the state may provide an answer to this question. Specifically, neoliberal policies and attitudes are based upon a one-sided view of “work” and economic activity that erodes the dignity of the political community and its members. Both elites and non-elites are suffering from the cannibalization of the family and the colonization of the state by civil society, which produces social strain that goes well beyond economic anxieties. Furthermore, Kojève’s interpretation of Hegel, especially his understanding of the nature of authority, helps explain the distinctively political aspects of these developments. Neoliberalism, through its pursuit of increasing depoliticization, undermines its own sources of political legitimacy and ultimately reduces human relations to the application of force in the service of individual ends.

Portions of this essay were adapted from Adam Adatto Sandel, “Putting Work in Its Place: Lessons from Hegel,” American Affairs Volume I, Number 1 (Spring 2017): 152–62.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 32.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Shadi Hamid, “The End of the End of History,” Foreign Policy, November 15, 2016, http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/11/15/the-end-of-the-end-of-history/.

  2. 2.

    See, for example, Thomas E. Trail and Benjamin R. Karney, “What’s (Not) Wrong with Low-Income Marriages,” Journal of Marriage and Family Volume 74, Issue 3 (June 2012): 413–427.

  3. 3.

    Various studies of this phenomenon are summarized in Sharon Lerner, “Knocked Up and Knocked Down: Why America’s Widening Fertility Class Divide is a Problem,” Slate, Sept. 26, 2011, http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2011/09/knocked_up_and_knocked_down.html.

  4. 4.

    Alexandre Kojève, The Notion of Authority (A Brief Presentation), ed. Francois Terré, trans. Hager Weslati (London: Verso, 2014), 8.

  5. 5.

    Ibid., 10–11.

  6. 6.

    Ibid., 67–69.

  7. 7.

    In other words, the authority of the legislator or the judge is not necessarily related to the power of, for example, the legislative or judicial branches, or even to the biographical characteristics of the rulers. It rather concerns how the purposes of the state are conceived or the ends toward which authority is exercised and perceived to exist. For instance, if the main purposes of the state are believed to be to uphold contracts and maintain a “level playing field,” that state would be said to be dominated by the authority of the judge . Likewise, a state that based its legitimacy on a new political project would be dominated by the authority of the leader ; military defense or conquest, the master; and preserving social traditions , the father.

  8. 8.

    Ibid., 41.

  9. 9.

    Ibid., 76.

  10. 10.

    Ibid., 91.

  11. 11.

    Ibid., 51–52.

  12. 12.

    Ibid., 22.

  13. 13.

    Ibid., 70.

  14. 14.

    For Kojève , the liberal “separation of powers,” when it constitutes a separation of authority, heralds the decline of political authority. It is beyond the scope of this essay to discuss this specific argument in detail. Cf. Ibid., 63–87.

  15. 15.

    Ibid., 64.

  16. 16.

    Ibid., 64.

  17. 17.

    Ibid., 75.

  18. 18.

    Ibid., 75.

  19. 19.

    Ibid., 77.

  20. 20.

    Ibid., 52.

  21. 21.

    Ibid., 75–76.

  22. 22.

    Ibid., 65–66.

  23. 23.

    George Lakoff, “Understanding the Allure of Trump,” Berkeley Blog, University of California at Berkeley, August 1, 2016, http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2016/08/01/understanding-the-allure-of-trump/.

List of References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sandel, A.A., Krein, J. (2018). Uncivil Society: Hegel, Kojève, and the Crisis of Political Legitimacy. In: Sable, M., Torres, A. (eds) Trump and Political Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74427-8_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics