Abstract
The rise in anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions and the resultant temperature anomaly in the global climate can be simplified to a function of (1) the global population, (2) economic activity and (3) technological development for thought experiments. Diet, given the embodied process emissions in producing food, is also acknowledged as an important factor. Growth in the first two factors tends to increase environmental impacts while technological development can reduce them. In this chapter, the impact from these four variables, their interdependencies and importance are illustrated. To do so, three different model frameworks are combined namely IPAT, Ecological Footprint and Integrated Assessment Modelling, to illustrate the challenges to finding pathways to maintain a well below 2 °C world. The model setup developed for this chapter estimates the global mean temperature increase to 2100 and the needed land area to support human life as a function of population, affluence, technological development and diet. It is shown that focusing on technology development alone will likely not be enough to mitigate global warming and stay well below a 2 °C temperature increase. Therefore, the discussion about population, consumption, development and diet shifting should be high on the agenda for reducing energy demands and for increasing the feasibility of maintaining a well below 2 °C world.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Boserup E (1981) Population and technological change. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Ehrlich P, Holdren J (1971) Impact of population growth. Science (New Science) 171(3977):1212–1217
Engelman R (2011) An end to population growth: why family-planning is key to a sustainable future. Solutions Sustain Desirable Future 2(3). http://www.thesolutionsjournal.com
FAOSTAT (2017) Food and agriculture organization of the united nations data. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Jespersen J, Chick V (2016) John maynard keynes (1883–1946). Faccarello IG, Kurz HD (red), Handbook on the history of economic analysis: great economists since petty and boisguilbert, vol. 1. Edward Elgar Publishing, Incorporated, Cheltenham, UK, s. 468–483
Kanors-EMR (2017) TIAM-WORLD. Available at: http://www.kanors-emr.org/models/tiam-w
Kriegler E et al (2012) The need for and use of socio-economic scenarios for climate change analysis: a new approach based on shared socio-economic pathways. Global Environ Change 22:807–822
Loulou R (2008) ETSAP-TIAM: the TIMES integrated assessment model Part II: Mathematical formulation. Comput Manag Sci, Spec Issue Managing Energy Environ 5(1–2):41–66
Loulou R, Labriet M (2008) ETSAP-TIAM: the TIMES integrated assessment model Part I: model structure. Comput Manage Sci, 5(1):7–40. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:comgts:v:5:y:2008:i:1:p:7–40
Lütken OD (1758) An enquiry into the proposition that the number of people is the happiness of the realm, or the greater the number of subjects, the more flourishing the state. Danmarks og Norges Oeconomiske Magazin
Malthus T (1798) An Essay on the principle of population. Available at: http://www.esp.org/books/malthus/population/malthus.pdf
Matthews HD, Gillett NP, Stott PA, Zickfeld K (2009) The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions. Nature 459(7248):829–832
Moss RH, Edmonds JA, Hibbard KA, Manning MR, Rose SK, Van Vuuren DP, Carter TR, Emori S, Kainuma M, Kram T, Meehl GA, Mitchel JFB, Nakicenovic N, Riahi K, Smith SJ, Stouffer RJ, Thomson AM, Weyant JP, Wilbanks TJ (2010) The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463(7282):747–756
NASA (2017) Data. Available at: http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/
Nørgård J, Xue J (2017) From green growth towards a sustainable real economy, real world economics review, #80. http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue80/NorgaardXue80.pdf
O’Neill BC et al (2014) A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Clim Change 122:387–400
Ranganathan J et al (2016) Shifting diets for a sustainable food future. Available at: http://www.wri.org/sites/default/files/Shifting_Diets_for_a_Sustainable_Food_Future_1.pdf
Rees W, Wackernagel M (1996) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, BC
Shrinkthatfootprint (2017) Life cycle assessment data. Available at: http://shrinkthatfootprint.com/food-carbon-footprint-diet
Simon J (1980) Resource, population, environment: an oversupply of false bad news. Science 208:1431–1437
Simon J (1981) Environmental disruption or environmental improvement? Social Sci Q 62(1):30–43
The Global Footprint Network (2017) Data. Available at: http://www.footprintnetwork.org/licenses/public-data-package-free-edition-copy/
Wackernagel M et al (2002) Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy. Proc Nat Acad Sci 99:9266–9271
Wackernagel M et al (2014) Ecological footprint accounts, handbook of sustainable development (second revised edition). Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, Glos, UK
Worldbank (2017) Data. Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Karlsson, K. et al. (2018). The Role of Population, Affluence, Technological Development and Diet in a Below 2 °C World. In: Giannakidis, G., Karlsson, K., Labriet, M., Gallachóir, B. (eds) Limiting Global Warming to Well Below 2 °C: Energy System Modelling and Policy Development. Lecture Notes in Energy, vol 64. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74424-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74424-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74423-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74424-7
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)