The Importance of the Water-Energy Nexus for Emerging Countries When Moving Towards Below 2 °C

  • Gary Goldstein
  • Pascal Delaquil
  • Fadiel Ahjum
  • Bruno Merven
  • Adrian Stone
  • James Cullis
  • Wenying Chen
  • Nan Li
  • Yongnan Zhu
  • Yizi Shang
  • Diego Rodriguez
  • Morgan Bazilian
  • Anna Delgado-Martin
  • Fernando Miralles-Wilhelm
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Energy book series (LNEN, volume 64)

Abstract

The Thirsty Energy initiative of the World Bank assists countries to address water and energy planning challenges in an integrated manner. The first two Case Studies for South Africa and China have been completed. The approach to developing “water-smart” energy planning models was different in the two Case Studies, with key findings and important insights arising from each. The most fundamental conclusion from both studies is that policies being pursued to mitigate climate change impacts reduce both CO2 emissions and water needs by the energy sector—with only modest increase in energy system cost, and that including the supply and cost of water has a dramatic effect on the upstream technology choices. For example, government mandated policies forcing dry cooling for new coal-fired power plants was reaffirmed as wise and appropriate, though at odds with achieving Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC) which quickly disincentivizes the use of coal while promoting renewables and nuclear, as a major step towards achieving below 2 °C emission reductions. Thirsty Energy also examined the influence of climate change on energy and water planning, where results for the two Case Studies proved to be very different, as water availability in China’s northern Energy Bases may actually increase slightly, while in South Africa the water system is stressed forcing more dramatic changes in the energy sector.

References

  1. Chen W, Yin X, Zhang H (2016) Towards a low carbon development in China: a comparison of national and global models. Clim Change 136:95–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Energy Research Centre (2017) http://www.erc.uct.ac.za/groups/esap/satim
  3. Huang W, Ma D, Chen W (2017) Connecting water and energy: Assessing the impacts of carbon and water constraints on China’s power sector. Appl Energy 185:1497–1505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Vuuren Van et al (2011) The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim Change 109(1–2):5–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. World Bank (2017a) Modeling the water-energy nexus: how do water constraints affect energy planning in South Africa? World Bank, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. World Bank (2017b) Thirsty energy: modeling the water-energy nexus in China. World Bank, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary Goldstein
    • 1
  • Pascal Delaquil
    • 2
  • Fadiel Ahjum
    • 3
  • Bruno Merven
    • 3
  • Adrian Stone
    • 4
  • James Cullis
    • 5
  • Wenying Chen
    • 6
  • Nan Li
    • 6
  • Yongnan Zhu
    • 7
  • Yizi Shang
    • 7
  • Diego Rodriguez
    • 8
  • Morgan Bazilian
    • 8
  • Anna Delgado-Martin
    • 8
  • Fernando Miralles-Wilhelm
    • 9
  1. 1.DecisionWare Group LLCSag HarborUSA
  2. 2.DecisionWare Group LLCGreshamUSA
  3. 3.University of Cape TownRondeboschSouth Africa
  4. 4.Sustainable Energy AfricaCape TownSouth Africa
  5. 5.AureconCape TownSouth Africa
  6. 6.Institute of Energy, Environment and Economy, Tsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  7. 7.State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River BasinInstitute of Water Resources and Hydropower ResearchBeijingChina
  8. 8.World BankWashingtonUSA
  9. 9.University of MarylandMarylandUSA

Personalised recommendations