Parasitic Bipolar Transistors in Benchmark Structures

  • Pietro Buccella
  • Camillo Stefanucci
  • Maher Kayal
  • Jean-Michel Sallese
Part of the Analog Circuits and Signal Processing book series (ACSP)


This chapter discusses the validation of the EPFL substrate model against experimental data of parasitic couplings measured from specific test circuits fabricated in a HV-CMOS technology. The substrate model is based on a distributed network composed of three lumped components whose parameters must be calibrated. Therefore, a specific technology calibration methodology is developed and uses the electrical characteristics of simple structures such as diodes and bipolar transistors. Parasitic simulations are compared with measurements of substrate couplings in simple test structures, in a high-voltage H-Bridge, and in a rotor coil driver used in automotive alternators. The results are also discussed in terms of computational resources needed for the extraction and simulation of the substrate model.


  1. 1.
    L. Fanucci, G. Pasetti, P. D’Abramo, R. Serventi, F. Tinfena, P. Chassard, L. Labiste, P. Tisserand, An high voltage CMOS voltage regulator for automotive alternators with programmable functionalities and full reverse polarity capability, in Design, Automation Test in Europe Conference Exhibition (DATE), pp. 526–531, March 2010Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Hastings, The Art of Analog Layout (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Kollmitzer, M. Olbrich, E. Barke, Analysis and modeling of minority carrier injection in deep-trench based BCD technologies, in 9th Conference on Ph.D. Research in Microelectronics and Electronics (PRIME), pp. 245–248, June 2013Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. Murari, F. Bertotti, G.A. Vignola, A. Andreini, Smart Power ICs: Technologies and Applications (Springer, Berlin, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Y. Oh, S. Lee, H. Shin, J.-S. Rieh, Trench-type deep N-well dual guard ring for the suppression of substrate noise coupling. Int. J. RF Microwave Comput. Aided Eng. 21(1), 36–44 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Saponara, G. Pasetti, F. Tinfena, L. Fanucci, P. D’Abramo, HV-CMOS design and characterization of a smart rotor coil driver for automotive alternators. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 60(6), 2309–2317 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Schenkel, Substrate current effects in smart power ICs, Ph.D. thesis, ETH Zürich, Nr. 14925, 2003Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R.K. Williams, M.E. Cornell, J.A. Harnden, MOSFET flyback-diode conduction and dV/dt effects in power ICs in low-voltage motor control applications, in Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs, 1991. ISPSD’91 (IEEE, Baltimore, 1991), pp. 254–257Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pietro Buccella
    • 1
  • Camillo Stefanucci
    • 1
  • Maher Kayal
    • 1
  • Jean-Michel Sallese
    • 2
  1. 1.STI IEL GR-KAÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.STI IEL EDALBÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations