Subjective and Objective Measures of Health Information Literacy: Do They Provide Complementary or Redundant Information?
The present study examines the psychometric properties and the usefulness of the Health Information Literacy Knowledge Test (HILK), a 24 item multiple-choice test which aims at assessing knowledge related to determining a health information need, searching and accessing information, and evaluating its relevance and quality. 144 German university students completed the HILK together with established subjective measures of health (information) literacy and health status. Correlations of the HILK with subjective measures were at least marginally significant, supporting the assumption that both types of measures assess related constructs. In multiple regression analyses, HILK scores predicted mental and physical health status while there were no associations between subjective health (information) literacy with both health measures. It is concluded that the HILK is a research tool which complements subjective assessments of health literacy and might even be more useful when it comes to predicting health outcomes.
KeywordsHealth information literacy Health literacy Assessment Health status Questionnaires Knowledge tests
- 1.Medical Library Association Task Force on Health Information: Health Information Literacy Definitions (2003)Google Scholar
- 4.American Library Association: Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: Final Report (1989)Google Scholar
- 7.Schulz, P.J., Hartung, U.: The future of health literacy. In: Schaeffer, D., Pelikan, J.M. (eds.) Health Literacy. Forschungsstand und Perspektiven [Health Literacy. State of Research and Perspectives], pp. 79–92. Hogrefe, Goettingen (2017)Google Scholar
- 14.Davis, T.C., Long, S.W., Jackson, R.H., Mayeaux, E.J., George, R.B., Murphy, P.W., Crouch, M.A.: Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. Fam. Med. 25(6), 391–395 (1993)Google Scholar
- 19.Eisenberg, M.B., Berkowitz, R.E.: Information Problem Solving: the Big Six Skills Approach to Library, Information Skills Instruction. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood (1990)Google Scholar
- 21.Chan, Y.M.: Predictors of health information overload within internet users. Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Res. 2(12), 881–887 (2012)Google Scholar
- 24.Sørensen, K., Van den Broucke, S., Pelikan, J.M., Fullam, J., Doyle, G., Slonska, Z., Brand, H.: Measuring health literacy in populations: illuminating the design and development process of the european health literacy survey questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q). BMC Public Health 13(1), 948 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Bullinger, M., Kirchberger, I.: Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand – Manual [Health Survey – Manual]. Hogrefe, Goettingen (1998)Google Scholar
- 26.McNeish, D.: Thanks Coefficient Alpha, We’ll Take it From Here. Psychological Methods (accepted for publication) (2017)Google Scholar
- 27.Field, A.: Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS statistics, 4th edn. Sage, London (2013)Google Scholar
- 28.Rosman, T., Mayer, A.-K., Krampen, G.: Combining self-assessments and achievement tests in information literacy assessment: empirical results and recommendations for practice. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 39, 1–15 (2015)Google Scholar
- 29.Van der Heide, I., Uiters, E., Boshuizen, H., Rademakers, J.: Health literacy in Europe: the development and validation of health literacy prediction models. Eur. J. Public Health 25 (suppl_3) (2015)Google Scholar