“German Association or Chinese Emperor?” Building COINs Between China and Germany

Part of the Studies on Entrepreneurship, Structural Change and Industrial Dynamics book series (ESID)


This paper describes our experience teaching a distributed virtual course with teams made up by students from China and Germany. It is based on a distributed course about Collaborative Innovation Networks (COINs) which has been successfully taught for the last 12 years to students from Germany, the US, Finland, and Switzerland. In this course, students form teams from different locations and languages, and together complete a complex project analyzing online social media. In 2016–2017, we applied the same course framework to participants from China and Germany. To gather insights from the course, we follow a mixed method study design by analyzing qualitative interviews with course participants and quantitative communication data of course participants. We find that combining members from China and Germany into the same team poses a set of unique intercultural challenges, overcoming language and behavioral differences. We present key lessons learned to inform future courses combining participants from the East and the West.


Collaborative Innovation Networks (COINs) Condor Tool Intercultural Courses Intercultural Teams Chinese Students 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Connaughton, S. L., & Marissa, S. (2007). Multinational and multicultural distributed teams: A review and future agenda. Small Group Research, 38(3), 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook on mixed methods in the behavioral and social sciences (pp. 209–240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Gloor, P. A. (2017). Sociometrics and human relationships: Analyzing social networks to manage brands, predict trends, and improve organizational performance. Bingley: Emerald.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gloor, P. A., Paasivaara, M. (2013). COINs change leaders – Lessons learned from a distributed course. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Collaborative Innovation Networks COINs 2013, August, 11–13, Santiago de Chile.Google Scholar
  5. Gloor, P. A., Paasivaara, M., Miller, C., & Lassenius, C. (2016). Lessons from the collaborative innovation networks seminar. International Journal of Organisational Design and Engineering, 4(1/2), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Krishna, S., Sahay, S., & Walsham, G. (2004). Managing cross-cultural issues in global software outsourcing. Communications of the ACM, 47(4), 62–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nicholson, B., & Sahay, S. (2001). Some political and cultural issues in the globalisation of software development: Case experience from Britain and India. Information and Organization, 11, 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ochieng, E. G., & Price, A. D. F. (2010). Managing cross-cultural communication in multicultural construction project teams: The case of Kenya and UK. International Journal of Project Management, 28(5), 449–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Stahl, G. K., Maznevski, M. L., Voigt, A., & Jonsen, K. (2010). Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A meta-analysis of research on multicultural work groups. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4), 690–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jilin UniversityChangchunChina
  2. 2.University of BambergBambergGermany
  3. 3.MIT Center for Collective IntelligenceCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations