Skip to main content

Open Public Spaces and the Vita Activa

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 841 Accesses

Part of the book series: The Urban Book Series ((UBS))

Abstract

Free spaces are of great importance for cities—although they are often treated poorly by public and private agents—as spaces of daily life, as places of coexistence at the most diverse scales, as preferred loci of political manifestations and many other social practices. Free spaces are also the main elements capable of providing environmental services in urban areas. The public relevance of free spaces in Brazilian capitals, metropolis, and medium-sized cities is the theme discussed in this chapter. It presents a system of concepts that allow a better understanding of the theme and that may prove useful for the production of public policies seriously interested in improving the quality of urban spaces in Brazilian cities and metropolises in special, but is not limited to the reality of this country.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Among the most cited is always Richard Sennett. See Sennett (1977).

  2. 2.

    In Portuguese, Rede Nacional de Pesquisa Quadro do PaisagismoSistema de Espaços Livres. The QUAPÁ-SEL National Network includes researchers from all the country’s macro-regions, representing 25 universities in total. QUAPÁ-SEL projects have already studied more than 60 cities. Among the most significant we can cite almost all the state capitals: Brasília, São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Belo Horizonte, Salvador, Recife, Fortaleza, Curitiba, Porto Alegre, Manaus, Belém, Goiânia, São Luís, Natal, Maceió, Vitória, Florianópolis, Campo Grande, Palmas, Rio Branco, and Macapá, as well as the metropolitan areas of Campinas, Santos, São José dos Campos, Sorocaba, Maringá and Campina Grande, and the medium-sized cities of Uberlândia, Ribeirão Preto, Uberaba, Santa Maria, Anápolis, São Carlos, and Criciúma.

  3. 3.

    On June 20, 2013, alone, demonstrations were held in 388 Brazilian cities, including 22 state capitals. More than a million and a half people took to the streets to demand greater investment in public transportation (especially), health care and education.

  4. 4.

    Here, it is important to distinguish between communication and information. To communicate means to ‘make common,’ to enable the establishment of communicative reason, a mutual understanding between subjects, and to presume dialogue rather than merely a relationship between a transmitter of information and a receiver.

  5. 5.

    The Brazilian Civil Code of 2002 (Brazil 2002) identifies public assets as properties belonging to the federal government, federal states, and federal district, municipalities, autonomous bodies, and public foundations. Public assets are divided into three categories: (1) assets for common use of the population, intended to be used by the general public (streets, squares, beaches, etc.); (2) assets for special use, intended for the execution of public services (e.g., hospitals and public schools); and (3) unused publicly owned assets, or in other words properties without any established public purpose, constituting an available public asset capable of being sold off.

  6. 6.

    In Brazil, watersides are identified as Permanent Preservation Areas (Áreas de Preservação Permanentes: APPs), which provides them with legal protection from intensive human use, including those areas located in urban environments. In practice, though, this legislation is widely ignored and illegal occupations are common. It would be better, therefore, for these areas to be effectively integrated into urban space, taking into account, of course, natural aspects, seasonal rainfall patterns, floods, the role of such areas in gene flows, and so on.

  7. 7.

    ‘Open spaces for public use’ is the expression used in Federal Law 6.766/79 (Brazil 1979) to designate all spaces intended for public interaction and leisure. In various municipalities, these spaces are commonly referred to as ‘leisure systems,’ a somewhat impoverished expression of what such spaces actually comprise. This terminology probably stems from the influence of modern functionalist urbanism and its reductive simplification of urban functions to dwelling, working, recreation, and circulation.

  8. 8.

    Law 9.785/99 (Brazil 1999), which revised the federal legislation on land use, allowed municipalities to stipulate the percentages to be allocated to public spaces, a neoliberal decision typical of the federal government of the period. Fortunately, the culture created by the earlier Law 6.766/79 had already taken root and the 35% level was almost always maintained, or even increased, as in the São Paulo case where 40% has to be allocated to public spaces, including 15% to open spaces for public use.

  9. 9.

    The Municipality of São Paulo lies at the hub of a metropolitan region with more than 21 million inhabitants (IBGE 2016), and containing almost 12 million vehicles in circulation in 2014 (Denatran 2015).

  10. 10.

    In the city of São Paulo, in 2010, congestion reached daily levels of between 70 and 230 km. The average speed on the city’s expressways in these day-to-day situations of congestion is less than 10 km/h, much slower than traveling by bicycle (25 km/h). In the worst traffic jams, the average speed is equivalent to the pace of a chicken.

  11. 11.

    It is worth pointing out that the ‘oldest’ and most famous ‘promenade’ in the country, the Copacabana Promenade (1970), designed by Roberto Burle Marx, does not fit the type cited above since the sidewalk is not used solely by pedestrians: In fact, it is very wide, running alongside an avenue parallel to the shore front—Avenida Atlântica—and includes various lanes for motor vehicles and a cycle lane implanted in the 1990s.

  12. 12.

    In 2016, the country had two metropolitan regions with more than 12 million inhabitants (São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro) and eight metropolitan regions with a population between 3 and 6 million inhabitants: Belo Horizonte, Porto Alegre, Brasília, Fortaleza, Salvador, Recife, Curitiba, and Campinas (IBGE 2016). Officially, the metropolitan areas that include municipalities from more than one federal state, like Brasília, are denominated ‘integrated economic development regions’ (regiões integradas de desenvolvimento econômico: RIDEs), while the others are called ‘metropolitan regions’ (regiões metropolitanas: RMs).

  13. 13.

    Brazil (1965). Law 4.771 instituted the new Forest Code. Brasilia: Presidência da República. Casa Civil. Available at www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/L4771.htm. Accessed on March 17, 2012.

  14. 14.

    On Campinas, see Queiroga (2002). On Recife, see Ribeiro et al. (2000).

  15. 15.

    Findings reported at the QUAPÁ-SEL Research Workshop held in Maceió in 2008.

  16. 16.

    The carriageway was reduced and its central reservation converted into linear park.

  17. 17.

    Some prominent examples: Brasília on Sundays closes the Eixo Rodoviário (Road Axis), a route almost 14 km length known as the ‘Eixão,’ the most important avenue linking the North and South ‘wings’ of the city; in Rio de Janeiro the same occurs on Avenida Atlântica, the avenue running alongside one of the world’s most iconic urban beaches, Copacabana; in São Paulo each of the 39 district councils closes at least one main road on Sundays for leisure and social interaction, including the Avenida Paulista, perhaps the city’s most symbolic roadway, where São Paulo’s bank head offices and numerous industrial and commercial business organizations are located, along with cinemas, cultural centers, and the city’s leading art museum.

  18. 18.

    Brazil. Law 9.985 (Brazil 2000) […] created the National System of Natural Conservation Units and Other Provisions. Brasilia: Presidência da República. Casa Civil. Available at www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/L9985.htm. Accessed 6 September 2011.

  19. 19.

    Diadema is located in the São Paulo Metropolitan Region.

  20. 20.

    It is worth recalling the principal criticisms of these housing programs: The eviction of families from fluvial areas and the low quality of the housing developments produced.

  21. 21.

    Landscaping Laboratory of the Architecture and Urbanism Faculty of the University of São Paulo.

References

  • Arendt H (1958) The human condition. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt H (1991) A condição humana, 5th edn. Forense Universitária, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartalini V (2010) Sistemas de espaços livres. Interview with Lab QUAPÁ. Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Universidade de São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazil (1965) Lei nº 4.771. Institui o novo Código Florestal. Brasília: Presidência da República. Casa Civil. Available at www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/L4771.htm. Accessed on 17 Mar 2012

  • Brazil (1979) Lei nº 6.766. Dispõe sobre o Parcelamento do Solo Urbano e dá outras Providências. Brasília: Presidência da República. Casa Civil. Available at www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/L6766.htm. Accessed on 18 Sep 2011

  • Brazil (1999) Lei nº 9.785. Altera […] as Leis […] 6.766, de 19 de dezembro de 1979 (parcelamento do solo urbano). Brasília: Presidência da República. Casa Civil. Available at http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/L9785.htm. Accessed on 21 Sep 2011

  • Brazil (2000) Lei nº 9.985. Regulamenta o art. 225, § 1º, incisos I, II, III e IV da Constituição Federal, institui o Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservação da Natureza e dá outras Providências. Brasília: Presidência da República. Casa Civil. Available at www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/L9985.htm. Accessed on 6 Sep 2011

  • Brazil (2002) Lei nº 10.406. Institui o Código Civil. Brasília: Presidência da República. Casa Civil. Available at www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/2002/L10406.htm. Accessed on 18 Sep 2011

  • Denatran (2015) Frota de veículos - 2015. Available at www.denatran.gov.br/index.php/estatistica/257-frota-2015. Accessed on 16 Sep 2016

  • Habermas J (1987) The theory of communicative action. Beacon Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1989) The structural transformation of the public sphere. An inquiry into a category of Bourgeois Society. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (2006) Entre naturalismo y religión. Paidós, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (2007) A inclusão do outro: estudos de teoria política, 3rd edn. Loyola, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • IBGE. (2016). Cidades@. Available at www.cidades.ibge.gov.br. Accessed on 18 Sep 2016

  • Lefèbvre H (2008) O direito à cidade, 5th edn. Centauro, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefèbvre H (2009) The production of space, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Malden-MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Macedo S, Queiroga E (2016) Paisagem paulistana, formas, espaços livres e apropriações. In XIII ENEPEA. Anais. Available at enepeasalvador.wixsite.com/enepea2016/copia-artigos-aceitos. Accessed on 16 Sep 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnoli M (1982) Espaços livres e urbanização: uma introdução a aspectos da paisagem metropolitana. Livre Docência Thesis. Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin E (2008) O método 1: a natureza da natureza, 2nd edn. Sulina, Porto Alegre

    Google Scholar 

  • Queiroga E (2002) A megalópole e a praça: o espaço entre a razão de dominação e a razão comunicativa. Ph.D. Thesis. Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Queiroga E (2012) Dimensões públicas do espaço contemporâneo: resistências e transformações de territórios, paisagens e lugares urbanos brasileiros. Livre Docência Thesis. Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro AR et al (2000) Espaços livres do Recife. Prefeitura do Recife, Recife

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos M (1996) A natureza do espaço: técnica e tempo, Razão e Emoção. Hucitec, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos M (2000) Por uma outra globalização: do pensamento único à consciência universal. Record, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett R (1977) The fall of public man. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eugênio Fernandes Queiroga .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Queiroga, E.F. (2018). Open Public Spaces and the Vita Activa . In: Capanema Alvares, L., Barbosa, J. (eds) Urban Public Spaces. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74253-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics