Abstract
Global learning and high-impact practices often come together in simulations. However, preparing US students for effective and beneficial participation in a simulation of the European Union presents an interesting challenge. Most US students are unfamiliar with the European Union at best and completely unaware of its existence at worst. How does one go about not only introducing the EU but helping students arrive at a point where they are effective and engaged policy-makers within the EU simulation? When carefully crafted, simulations, whether in-class, cocurricular, or extracurricular, provide a high-impact learning experience for students. Most importantly, perhaps, and not covered in the definitions of high-impact practices or affective learning, most of the students who participate in EuroSim find that, while difficult and requiring a great deal of work, learning about such a seemingly distant topic and entity as the EU can be enjoyable. This chapter explores the challenges inherent in preparing US students for EuroSim, the extracurricular benefits for students that come from participation in such a simulation, and the improved achievement of learning goals through the inclusion of a simulation into the curriculum as a high-impact practice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Students may enroll in POLS 229 a maximum of four times as it is the course that prepares them for that year’s EuroSim.
- 2.
When EuroSim takes place at a European University, it is held in early January; when in the United States, the dates usually fall at the end of March or beginning of April.
References
Arnold, T. (1998). Make your history class hop with excitement (at least once a semester), designing and using classroom simulations. The History Teacher, 31(2), 193–203.
Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2008). High impact educational practices: A brief overview. Resource document. http://www.aacu.org/leap/hips. Accessed 15 Nov 2016.
Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2013). HIP tables. Resource document. https://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/LEAP/HIP_tables.pdf. Accessed 15 Nov 2016.
Chavez, J. C., & Napiere, M. B. (2014). Learning goal orientation and instructional strategies: Predictors of critical thinking. Journal of Information Systems Technology and Planning, 7(18), 117–127.
Ciliotta-Rubery, A., & Levy, D. (2000). Congressional committee simulation: An active learning experiment. PS: Political Science & Politics, 33(4), 847–851.
Dougherty, B. K. (2003). Byzantine politics: Using simulations to make sense of the Middle East. PS: Political Science & Politics, 36(2), 239–244.
Figueroa, C. (2014). Developing practical/analytical skills through mindful classroom simulations for doing leadership. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 20(1), 113–129.
Gore, T. N., Johnson, T. L., & Wang, C. (2015). Teaching nursing leadership: Comparison of simulation versus traditional inpatient clinical. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 12(1), 1–9.
Greenblat, C. S. (1973). Teaching with simulation games: A review of claims and evidence. Teaching Sociology, 1(1), 62–83.
Greenblat, C., & Duke, R. D. (Eds.). (1975). Gaming simulations: Rationale, design, and applications. New York: Halsted Press.
Gurley, K., & Wilson, D. (2011). Developing leadership skills in a virtual simulation: Coaching the affiliative style leader. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 5, 1–15.
Jones, R. (2008). Evaluating learning outcomes in EU simulations. The Journal of Political Science Education, 4(4), 404–434.
Jones, R., & Bursens, P. (2015). The effects of active learning environments: How simulations trigger affective learning. European Political Science, 14(3), 254–265.
McGaghie, W. C., Issenberg, S. B., Petrusa, E. R., & Scalese, R. J. (2006). Effect of practice on standardised learning outcomes in simulation-based medical education. Medical Education, 40(8), 792–797.
Scherer, Y. K., Foltz-Ramos, K., Fabry, D., & Chao, Y. (2016). Evaluating simulation methodologies to determine best strategies to maximize student learning. Journal of Professional Nursing, 32(5), 349–357.
Shellman, S. M. (2001). Active learning in comparative politics: A mock German election and coalition-formation simulation. PS: Political Science & Politics, 34(4), 827–834.
Swansbrough, R. H. (2003). Familiarity breeds respect toward congress: Teams in the classroom and workplace. PS: Political Science & Politics, 36(4), 769–772.
Szafran, R. F., & Mandolini, A. F. (1980). Student evaluations of a simulation game. Teaching Sociology, 8(1), 21–37.
Tallent, R. J., & Barnes, J. J. (2015). Think bubbles and Socrates: Teaching critical thinking to millenials in public relations classes. Universal Journal of Education Research, 3(7), 345–441.
Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249–276.
Watson, B. (1975). Games and socialization. In C. S. Greenblat & R. D. Duke (Eds.), Gaming simulations: Rationale, design, and applications. New York: Halsted Press.
Wills, K. V., & Clerkin, T. A. (2009). Incorporating reflective practice into team simulation projects for improved learning outcomes. Business Communications Quarterly, 72(2), 221–227.
Woodworth, J. W., Gump, R., & Forrester, J. R. (2005). Camelot: A role-playing simulation for political decision making (5th ed.). Florence: Wadsworth Publishing.
Zeff, E. E. (2003). Negotiating in the European Council: A model European Union format for individual classes. International Studies Perspectives, 4(3), 265–274.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jones, R. (2018). What’s the EU? Achieving Learning Outcomes and Preparing US Students for EuroSim. In: Bursens, P., Donche, V., Gijbels, D., Spooren, P. (eds) Simulations of Decision-Making as Active Learning Tools. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 22. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74147-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74147-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74146-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74147-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)