Skip to main content

What’s the EU? Achieving Learning Outcomes and Preparing US Students for EuroSim

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Simulations of Decision-Making as Active Learning Tools

Part of the book series: Professional and Practice-based Learning ((PPBL,volume 22))

Abstract

Global learning and high-impact practices often come together in simulations. However, preparing US students for effective and beneficial participation in a simulation of the European Union presents an interesting challenge. Most US students are unfamiliar with the European Union at best and completely unaware of its existence at worst. How does one go about not only introducing the EU but helping students arrive at a point where they are effective and engaged policy-makers within the EU simulation? When carefully crafted, simulations, whether in-class, cocurricular, or extracurricular, provide a high-impact learning experience for students. Most importantly, perhaps, and not covered in the definitions of high-impact practices or affective learning, most of the students who participate in EuroSim find that, while difficult and requiring a great deal of work, learning about such a seemingly distant topic and entity as the EU can be enjoyable. This chapter explores the challenges inherent in preparing US students for EuroSim, the extracurricular benefits for students that come from participation in such a simulation, and the improved achievement of learning goals through the inclusion of a simulation into the curriculum as a high-impact practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Students may enroll in POLS 229 a maximum of four times as it is the course that prepares them for that year’s EuroSim.

  2. 2.

    When EuroSim takes place at a European University, it is held in early January; when in the United States, the dates usually fall at the end of March or beginning of April.

References

  • Arnold, T. (1998). Make your history class hop with excitement (at least once a semester), designing and using classroom simulations. The History Teacher, 31(2), 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2008). High impact educational practices: A brief overview. Resource document. http://www.aacu.org/leap/hips. Accessed 15 Nov 2016.

  • Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2013). HIP tables. Resource document. https://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/LEAP/HIP_tables.pdf. Accessed 15 Nov 2016.

  • Chavez, J. C., & Napiere, M. B. (2014). Learning goal orientation and instructional strategies: Predictors of critical thinking. Journal of Information Systems Technology and Planning, 7(18), 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciliotta-Rubery, A., & Levy, D. (2000). Congressional committee simulation: An active learning experiment. PS: Political Science & Politics, 33(4), 847–851.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, B. K. (2003). Byzantine politics: Using simulations to make sense of the Middle East. PS: Political Science & Politics, 36(2), 239–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueroa, C. (2014). Developing practical/analytical skills through mindful classroom simulations for doing leadership. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 20(1), 113–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore, T. N., Johnson, T. L., & Wang, C. (2015). Teaching nursing leadership: Comparison of simulation versus traditional inpatient clinical. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 12(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenblat, C. S. (1973). Teaching with simulation games: A review of claims and evidence. Teaching Sociology, 1(1), 62–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenblat, C., & Duke, R. D. (Eds.). (1975). Gaming simulations: Rationale, design, and applications. New York: Halsted Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurley, K., & Wilson, D. (2011). Developing leadership skills in a virtual simulation: Coaching the affiliative style leader. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 5, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. (2008). Evaluating learning outcomes in EU simulations. The Journal of Political Science Education, 4(4), 404–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R., & Bursens, P. (2015). The effects of active learning environments: How simulations trigger affective learning. European Political Science, 14(3), 254–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGaghie, W. C., Issenberg, S. B., Petrusa, E. R., & Scalese, R. J. (2006). Effect of practice on standardised learning outcomes in simulation-based medical education. Medical Education, 40(8), 792–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, Y. K., Foltz-Ramos, K., Fabry, D., & Chao, Y. (2016). Evaluating simulation methodologies to determine best strategies to maximize student learning. Journal of Professional Nursing, 32(5), 349–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shellman, S. M. (2001). Active learning in comparative politics: A mock German election and coalition-formation simulation. PS: Political Science & Politics, 34(4), 827–834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swansbrough, R. H. (2003). Familiarity breeds respect toward congress: Teams in the classroom and workplace. PS: Political Science & Politics, 36(4), 769–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szafran, R. F., & Mandolini, A. F. (1980). Student evaluations of a simulation game. Teaching Sociology, 8(1), 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallent, R. J., & Barnes, J. J. (2015). Think bubbles and Socrates: Teaching critical thinking to millenials in public relations classes. Universal Journal of Education Research, 3(7), 345–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, B. (1975). Games and socialization. In C. S. Greenblat & R. D. Duke (Eds.), Gaming simulations: Rationale, design, and applications. New York: Halsted Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills, K. V., & Clerkin, T. A. (2009). Incorporating reflective practice into team simulation projects for improved learning outcomes. Business Communications Quarterly, 72(2), 221–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodworth, J. W., Gump, R., & Forrester, J. R. (2005). Camelot: A role-playing simulation for political decision making (5th ed.). Florence: Wadsworth Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeff, E. E. (2003). Negotiating in the European Council: A model European Union format for individual classes. International Studies Perspectives, 4(3), 265–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca Jones .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jones, R. (2018). What’s the EU? Achieving Learning Outcomes and Preparing US Students for EuroSim. In: Bursens, P., Donche, V., Gijbels, D., Spooren, P. (eds) Simulations of Decision-Making as Active Learning Tools. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 22. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74147-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74147-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74146-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74147-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics