Skip to main content

Improving Project Success with Project Portfolio Management Practices

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
8th International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Product Management (EPPM 2017) (EPPM 2017)

Abstract

Projects have increasingly become organizations’ strategic initiatives to implement changes and improve organizational performance. Concerned over constrained resources and rapid changes that exist in the project environment, project portfolio management (PPM) can support organizations in prioritizing and selecting the right projects to meet strategic objectives and improve project success rates. This research aims to investigate and analyze the application of PPM in relation to project success in Australia by conducting a questionnaire survey with 64 senior project, program and portfolio managers from industry sectors across Australia. Graph Theoretic Approach (GTA) is employed as an analysis method to generate prioritization of the relationships between PPM practices and project success criteria. Twenty-five PPM practices are grouped into four categories and examined against seven project success criteria. The findings show that each group interacts with success criteria at a diverse range. These provide organizations with implications to benchmark their PPM practices with the current findings, especially those that strongly contribute to success in project implementation and outcomes. Furthermore, the results highlight integrated concepts and application between project success and portfolio management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Turner JR (2008) Handbook of project-based management. McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  2. Archibald R, Prado D (2014) The importance of knowing your project, program and portfolio management maturity. PM World J 3(2):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  3. The Standish Group International (2015) CHAOS report 2015. The Standish Group International. Retrieved from https://www.standishgroup.com/

  4. Thomas J, Delisle C, Jugdev K, Buckle P (2002) Selling project management to senior executives: the case for avoiding crisis sales? Project Management Institute

    Google Scholar 

  5. Meskendahl S (2010) The influence of business strategy on project portfolio management and its success—a conceptual framework. Int J Project Manage 28(8):807–817

    Google Scholar 

  6. PMI (2013) The standard for portfolio management, 3rd ed. Project Management Institute

    Google Scholar 

  7. Markowitz H (1952) Portfolio selection. J Finan 7(1):77–91

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thiry M, Deguire M (2007) Recent developments in project-based organisations. Int J Project Manage 25(7):649–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jeffery M, Leliveld I (2004) Best practices in IT portfolio management. MIT Sloan Manage Rev 45(3):41

    Google Scholar 

  10. Müller R, Martinsuo M, Blomquist T (2008) Project portfolio control and portfolio management performance in different contexts. Project manage J 39(3):28–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Young M, Conboy K (2013) Contemporary project portfolio management: reflections on the development of an Australian competency standard for project portfolio management. Int J Project Manage 31(8):1089–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Martinsuo M, Lehtonen P (2009) Project autonomy in complex service development networks. Int J Managing Projects Bus 2(2):261–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Koh A, Crawford L (2012) Portfolio management: the Australian experience. Project Manage J 43(6):33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Martinsuo M, Lehtonen P (2007) Role of single-project management in achieving portfolio management efficiency. Int J Project Manage 25(1):56–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Patanakul P (2015) Key attributes of effectiveness in managing project portfolio. Int J Project Manage 33(5):1084–1097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Killen CP, Hunt RA (2013) Robust project portfolio management: capability evolution and maturity. Int J Managing Projects Bus 6(1):131–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pajares J, López A (2014) New methodological approaches to project portfolio management: the role of interactions within projects and portfolios. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 119:645–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Atkinson R (1999) Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. Int J Project Manage 17(6):337–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shrnhur AJ, Levy O, Dvir D (1997) Mapping the dimensions of project success. Project manage J 28(2):5–13

    Google Scholar 

  20. Munns AK, Bjeirmi BF (1996) The role of project management in achieving project success. Int J Project Manage 14(2):81–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cooke-Davies T (2002) The “real” success factors on projects. Int J Project Manage 20(3):185–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jugdev K, Moller R (2006) A retrospective look at our evolving understanding of project success. IEEE Eng Manage Rev 3(34):110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shenhar AJ, Dvir D (2007) Reinventing project management: the diamond approach to successful growth and innovation. Harvard Business Review Press

    Google Scholar 

  24. Turner R, Zolin R (2012) Forecasting success on large projects: developing reliable scales to predict multiple perspectives by multiple stakeholders over multiple time frames. Project Manage J 43(5):87–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Harris JM, Hirst JL, Mossinghoff MJ (2008) Combinatorics and graph theory, vol 2. New York: Springer, p 139

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rao RV (2007) Decision making in the manufacturing environment: using graph theory and fuzzy multiple attribute decision making methods. Springer Science & Business Media

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick Hadjinicolaou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hadjinicolaou, N., Dumrak, J., Mostafa, S. (2018). Improving Project Success with Project Portfolio Management Practices. In: Şahin, S. (eds) 8th International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Product Management (EPPM 2017). EPPM 2017. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74123-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74123-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74122-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74123-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics