Advertisement

Evaluating the Need to Use Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) Approach as a New Alternative Implementation System in Developing Countries

  • Farimah Noghli
  • Ehsan Saghatforoush
  • Zahra Forghani
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

In this work a new approach was proposed for implementing Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) in the US. In this method, all of the main stakeholders of the project attend from its beginning. Plans, contracts, and predictions are performed with their presence. Despite the direct effect of this approach on increasing the quality and decreasing the claims, still it is unknown in many developing countries such as Iran. The aim of this study is evaluating the need to use IPD approach in the civil projects of such developing countries by looking at the Iran case. The advantage of this approach is reducing time and cost, as well as improving the quality of the projects, and also decreasing claims during their implementation. This study addresses the importance of understanding and using this new project implementation system through in-depth literature review process. It investigates advantages and disadvantages of the available delivery systems in Iran and examines the effect of using the IPD approach on the reduction of shortcomings of available contracts, and enhances achieving project success. This study changes the view of practitioners of the country’s construction industry on the existing contracts and guarantees the quality of project implementation by the help of this newly born delivery system.

Keywords

Integrated project delivery Developing countries Contract Iran Civil projects Delivery system 

References

  1. 1.
    Dorsey W, R (2009) Project delivery systems in construction industry. University of Tehran Press, TehranGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Talkhabi H, Jalal MP, Golabchi M (2014) Analyzing the causes of contracting claims in design and build underground projects in the country. J Eng Tunnels Undergr SpacesGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shakeri E, Ghorbani A (2006) Project management and construction the major couse of contracting claims in civil project. Project Management Institute (PMI), TehranGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mollaglu-kormaz S, miller VD, Sun W (2014) Assessing key dimensions to effective innovation implementation in interorganizational project teams: an integrated project delivery case. Eng Proj Organ JGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    AIA, AIA Minnesota, School of Architecture-University of Minnesota (2012) IPD case studies. AIA, MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Collins W, Parrish K (2014) The need for integrated project delivery in the public sector. AIA California Council, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Golabchi M, Faraji A (2010) Project strategic management. University of Tehran Press, TenhranGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Latifi Rostami M, Shirazi Rostami G, Hajizadeh Rostami F (2005) Examine and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of different methods of implementation of the project and compare them. Development Finance Institution, londonGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Levy M, S (2009) Design-build. University of Tehran Press, TehranGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shakeri E, Sajadi SV (2012) Comparative three general condition of the three factors, design and construction of civil industrial construction projects (5490) within the scope of the project changes. METKA, GreekGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    AIA National/AIA California Council (2007) Integrated project delivery: a guide. AIA, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    3xPT Strategy Group (2007) Integrated project delivery: first principles for owners and teams. 3xPT Strategy Group, AmericaGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee WH, Anderson SM, Kim Y-W, Ballard G (2014) Advancing impact of education, training, and professional experience on integrated project delivery. Integrated Project Delivery, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kent DC, Becerik-Gerber B (2010) Understanding construction industry experience and attitudes toward integrated project delivery. J Constr Eng ManagGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khaki G (2015) Research methods in management. Foojan, TehranGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hafeznia M (2005) Introduction to research methods in human sciences. Organization of research development, TehranGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Blekster L, Hiuz K, Tiat M (2012) How do research?. PNU, TehranGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hendrickson K, Aow T (2009) Construction project management. Unversity of Tehran Press, TehranGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shahhossieni V, Hajaralasvadi H, Nozhan Naderi A, Joshaghani A (2013) The use of building information modeling technology in integrated project items delivery. Building Information Modeling (BIM), UKGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nida A, Youngcheol K, Irtishad UA (2014) Factors influencing integrated project delivery in publicly owned construction projects: an information modelling perspective. Integrated Project Delivery (IPD), CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bidi A (2008) Risk management projects by applying conventional considerations. Project Management Institute, TehranGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ghassemi R, Becerik-Gerber B (2011) Transitioning to integrated project delivery: potential barriers and lessons learned. Lean Constr JGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pishdad-Bozorgi P, Moghaddam EH, Karasulu Y (2013) Advancing target price and target value design process in IPD using BIM and risk-sharing approaches. Building Information Modeling (BIM), UkGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Safavi SA, Shayanfar MA, Nasr Azadani SM, Eshteharian EA (2011) Investigate the causes of delay in the implementation of urban development projects according to the project. Project Management Institute, TehranGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Golabchi M, Hosseini SZ (2012) Principles of project management. University of Tehran Press, SLGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Becerik-Gerber B, DDes, Kent DC (2009) Implementation of integrated project delivery and building information modeling on a small commercial projectGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Glick S, Guggemos AA IPD and BIM: benefits and opportunities for regulatory agencies. Building Information Modeling (BIM), UkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Farimah Noghli
    • 1
  • Ehsan Saghatforoush
    • 1
  • Zahra Forghani
    • 1
  1. 1.MehrAlborz Institute of Higher EducationTehranIran

Personalised recommendations