Advertisement

A Comparison of Paid Versus Free Weather Services for Site Specific Weather Forecasts for Construction Projects

  • Evan M. Lauterbach
  • Salman Azhar
  • Amna Salman
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

Weather plays a pivotal role in almost every construction project. Historical observations of weather conditions in an area are closely used during project design, pre-construction planning, and construction stages. During the last five years there has been a steady increase in the number of paid weather services that claim to provide more accurate weather data as compared to the free weather services. The aim of this research study is to compare the reliability and accuracy of paid weather services versus the free ones. Weather data (high and low temperatures, precipitation, and wind speed) were recorded over the course of 90 calendar days from two different weather services namely the National Weather Service (Free) and a private site specific weather service (Paid). The weather forecast data of both services were statistically analyzed and compared against the actual observed conditions. The results indicated no significant statistical differences between the two weather services. In addition, both services fell short in predicting the accurate weather conditions beforehand. The findings of this study will help construction managers to decide whether or not to use a paid site-specific weather service as a decision-making tool for a specific project.

Keywords

Weather Schedule Planning Decision support Construction 

References

  1. 1.
    Benjamin NB, Greenwald TW (1973) Simulating effects of weather on construction. J Constr Div 99 (Proc Paper)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    El-Rayes K, Moselhi O (2001) Impact of rainfall on the productivity of highway construction. J Constr Eng Manag 127(2):125–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lauterbach EM (2016) Viability of site specific weather forecasts for construction. Auburn University, Graduate CapstoneGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moselhi O, Gong D, El-Rayes K (1997) Estimating weather impact on the duration of construction activities. Can J Civ Eng 24(3):359–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ratay RT (1989) Wind design problems with building structures during construction. J Aerosp Eng 2(2):102–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shahin A, AbouRizk SM, Mohamed Y (2010) Modeling weather-sensitive construction activity using simulation. J Constr Eng Manag 137(3):238–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smith GR, Hancher DE (1989) Estimating precipitation impacts for scheduling. J Constr Eng Manag 115(4):552–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thorpe D, Karan EP (2008) Method for calculating schedule delay considering weather conditions. In: Proceedings of the 24th annual conference of the Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM 2008), vol 2, pp 809–818. Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Evan M. Lauterbach
    • 1
  • Salman Azhar
    • 1
  • Amna Salman
    • 1
  1. 1.McWhorter School of Building ScienceAuburn UniversityAuburnUSA

Personalised recommendations