Identification and Tracking of Process Inconsistencies in Manufacturing Enterprises

  • Arkadiusz Jurczuk
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


Identification and elimination of process inconsistencies is a crucial aspect of improving the competitiveness and performance of an enterprise. Analysis and understanding of inconsistencies determines the success or failure of improvement initiatives undertaken by enterprises. A process inconsistency may be considered a negative effect of internal factors on an organization’s capability. Moreover, it could be perceived as an effect of a misfit between organizational characteristics and contingencies. The main purpose of the paper is to identify the sources of process inconsistencies and examine attempts at their elimination in manufacturing enterprises. To this purpose, the paper proposes an adaptation of the classification tree analysis. This approach makes it possible to identify omitted areas of process improvement in leading manufacturing enterprises from North-Eastern Poland. The results of the analysis indicate that the attempts to eliminate problems in the examined enterprises are not fully-effective. The majority of the inconsistencies reported by employees and customers were not lastingly eliminated. The dominant source of inconsistencies was related to process and organizational aspects. The paper is intended to cast light on some of the key barriers to the implementation of the process approach through tracking inconsistencies in manufacturing enterprises.


Manufacturing Inconsistencies Enterprises Tracking 



The research was conducted within S/WZ/1/2017 project and was financed from Ministry of Science and Higher Education funds.


  1. 1.
    Bhargav D (2017) Business process management—a construction case study. Constr Innov 17(1):50–67. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Breiman L, Friedman J, Stone CJ, Olshen RA (1984) Classification and regression trees. CRCGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cooper DR, Schindler PS (2014) Business research methods, 12th edn. The McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davenport TH (2010) Process management for knowledge work. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management 1 international handbooks on information systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Donaldson L (2006) The contingency theory of organizational design: challenges and opportunities. In: Burton RM, Håkonsson DD, Eriksen B, Snow CC (eds) Organization design the evolving state-of-the-art, Springer, US.
  6. 6.
    Emery CR (2009) A cause-effect-cause model for sustaining cross-functional integration. Bus Proc Manage J 15(1):93–108. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gulledge TR, Sommer RA (1999) Process coupling in business process engineering. Knowl Process Manage 6(3):158–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Glaser B, Strauss A (1999) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transaction, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Glavan LM, Vukšić VB, Vlahović N (2015) Decision tree learning for detecting turning points in business process orientation: a case of Croatian companies. Croatian Oper Res Rev 6(1):207–224. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hammer M (2010) What is Business Process Management? In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management 1 international handbooks on information systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ho SKM (1993) Problem solving in manufacturing. Manage Decis 31(7)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Izenman AJ (2008) Modern multivariate statistical techniques. Regression, classification and manifold learning. Springer, New York.
  13. 13.
    Jeston J, Nelis J (2008) Business process management: practical guidelines to successful implementations, 2nd edn. Elsevier, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jørgensen F, Boer H, Gertsen F (2003) Jump-starting continuous improvement through self-assessment. Int J Oper Prod Manag 2(10):1260–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jung M, Lee Y, Lee H (2015) Classifying and prioritizing the success and failure factors of technology commercialization of public R&D in South Korea: using classification tree analysis. J Technol Transf 40(5):877–898. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jurczuk A (2016) Reactive approach for cause analysis of business processes inconsistency. Organ Rev (Przegląd Organizacji) 3:42–48 (in Polish)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jurczuk A (2016) Towards process maturity—triggers of change. In: Proceedings of 9th international scientific conference business and management. 20 Nov 2016Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Karagiannis D (2013) Business process management: a holistic management approach. In: Mayr HC, Kop Ch, Liddle S, Ginige A (eds) Information systems: methods, models and applications, lecture notes in business information processing 137:1–12Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kohlbacher M, Reijers HA (2013) The effects of process-oriented organizational design on firm performance. Bus Process Manage J 19(2):245–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lowy A (2011) Nine paradoxes of problem solving. Strategy Leadersh 39(3):25–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Matthews RL, Tan KH, Marzec PE (2015) Organisational ambidexterity within process improvement: an exploratory study of four project-oriented firms. J Manuf Technol Manage 26(4):458–476. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    McCormack K, Willems J, van den Bergh J, Deschoolmeester D, Willaert P, Indihar Štemberger M, Škrinjar R, Trkman P, Ladeira MB, Valadares de Oliveira MP, Bosilj Vuksic V, Vlahovic N (2009) A global investigation of key turning points in business process maturity. Bus Proc Manage J 15(5):792–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nuseibeh B, Easterbrook SM, Russo A (2001) Making inconsistency respectable in software development. J Syst Softw 58(2):171–180. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Phogat S, Gupta AK (2017) Identification of problems in maintenance operations and comparison with manufacturing operations: a review. J Qual Maintenance Eng 23(2):1–16. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Saaty TL (1994) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces 24(6):19–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sanders Jones JL, Linderman K (2014) Process management, innovation and efficiency performance: the moderating effect of competitive intensity. Bus Proc Manage J 20(2):335–358. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Škrinjar R, Trkman P (2013) Increasing process orientation with business process management: critical practices’. Int J Inf Manage 33(1):48–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sommerville I, Sawyer P, Viller S (1999) Managing process inconsistency using view points. IEEE Trans Software Eng 25(6):784–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Talib F, Rahman Z (2015) Identification and prioritization of barriers to total quality management implementation in service industry. TQM J 27(5):591–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Trkman P (2010) The critical success factors of business process management. Int J Inf Manage 30(2):125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    vom Brocke J, Zelt S, Schmiedel T (2016) On the role of context in business process management. Int J Inf Manage 36(3):486–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Walker ED, Cox JF (2006) Addressing ill-structured problems using Goldratt’s thinking processes: a white collar example. Manag Decis 44(1):137–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering ManagementBialystok University of TechnologyBiałystokPoland

Personalised recommendations