Immigrant Student Achievement and the Performance Disadvantage

  • Ozge Bilgili
  • Louis Volante
  • Don Klinger
Part of the Policy Implications of Research in Education book series (PIRE, volume 9)


Education is a human right, and among the indicators of human development, education is indisputably one of the most important ones for its impact both on individuals’ lives as well as on communities and countries at large. Despite its evident importance, it cannot be taken for granted that everyone has access to (high quality) education. Equality and equity in access to education is a priority policy issue not only in developing countries but also in developed countries. In this era of knowledge based economy, the extent to which countries are able to provide high quality education (however it may be defined) to all members of their society is a significant predictor of economic growth and socioeconomic development. Within this context, identifying the disadvantaged groups within the student population and finding ways to mitigate the negative effects of these disadvantages while at the same time targeting the students with special support needs are crucial policy objectives. The objective of this book is to focus on the case of a growing and diverse group, namely students with a migration background. We seek to examine the extent to which immigrant students are integrated to education systems in their new settlement countries, whether their relative achievement in schools require special attention in comparison with their native peers, and how the receiving countries with diverse immigrant populations deal with challenges related to immigrant student achievement in their education policy.


  1. Acosta, S. T., & Hsein-Yuan, H. (2014). Negotiating diversity: An empirical investigation into family, school and student factors influencing New Zealand adolescents’ science literacy. Education Studies, 40(1), 98–115. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Areepattamannil, S., & Berinderjeet, K. (2013). Factors predicting science achievement of immigrant and non-immigrant students: A multi-level analysis. International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 11, 1183–1207. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baird, J., Isaacs, T., Johnson, S., Stobart, G., Yu, G., Sprague, T. et al. (2011). Policy effects of PISA. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Centre for Educational Assessment. Retrieved from
  4. Bilgili, O., Huddleston, T., & Joki, A. (2015). The dynamics between integration policies and outcomes: A synthesis of the literature. Barcelona, Spain: Centre for International Affairs.Google Scholar
  5. Cummins, J. (2012). The intersection of cognitive and sociocultural factors in the development of reading comprehension among immigrant students. Reading & Writing, 25(8), 1973–1990. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Driessen, G., & Merry, M. S. (2011). The effects of integration and generation of immigrants on language and numeracy achievement. Education Studies, 37(5), 581–592. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dronkers, J., & de Heus, M. (2013). Immigrant children’s academic performance: The influence of origin, destination and community. In H. D. Meyer & A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, power, and policy: The emergence of global educational governance (pp. 247–265). Oxford, UK: Symposium Books.Google Scholar
  8. Dronkers, J., & Kornder, N. (2014). Do migrant girls perform better than migrant boys? Deviant gender differences between the reading scores of 15-year-old children of migrants compared to native pupils. Educational Research and Evaluation, 20(1), 44–66. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dronkers, J., & Kornder, N. (2015). Can gender differences in educational performance of 15-year-old migrant pupils be explained by societal gender equality in origin and destination countries? Compare, 45(4), 610–634. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dronkers, J., Van Der Velden, R., & Dunne, A. (2012). Why are migrant students better off in certain types of education systems or schools than in others? European Educational Research Journal, 11(1), 11–44. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edwards, A. (2016, June 20). Global forced displacement hits record high. Retrieved from
  12. Entzinger, H., & Biezeveld, R. L. (2003). Benchmarking in immigrant integration. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: European Research Centre on Migration and Ethnic Relations.Google Scholar
  13. Eurostat. (2015a). Statistics explained: Educational attainment level of non-EU-born population (aged 25–54), 2015. Retrieved from
  14. Eurostat. (2015b). Statistics explained: Population (aged 25–54) by educational attainment level and groups of country of birth, EU-28, 2015. Retrieved from,_EU-28,_2015.png
  15. Eurostat. (2016, May 2). Press release: Almost 90 000 unaccompanied minors among asylum seekers registered in the EU in 2015. Retrieved from
  16. Hachfeld, A., Anders, Y., Schroeder, S., Stanat, P., & Kunter, M. (2010). Does immigration background matter? How teachers’ predictions of students’ performance relate to student background. International Journal of Educational Research, 49(2–3), 78–91. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huddleston, T., Bilgili, Ö., Joki, A. L., & Vankova, Z. (2015). Migrant Integration Policy Index 2015. Barcelona, Spain/Brussels, Germany: CIDOB and MPG.Google Scholar
  18. International Organization for Migration. (2015). Migration of children to Europe. Retrieved from
  19. Jungbauer-Gas, M., & Gross, C. (2011). More private schools for non-native students? Migrant performance in private schools of differing national contexts. Education Research International, 2011, 1–19. Google Scholar
  20. Khattab, N. (2015). Students’ aspirations, expectations and school achievement: What really matters? British Educational Research Journal, 41(5), 731–748. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lahaie, C. (2008). School readiness of children of immigrants: Does parental involvement play a role? Social Science Quarterly, 89(3), 684–705. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Makarova, E., & Herzog, W. (2011). The integration of immigrant youth into the school context. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 32, 86–97.Google Scholar
  23. Marschall, M. J., Shah, P. R., & Donato, K. (2012). Parent involvement policy in established and new immigrant destinations. Social Science Quarterly, 93(1), 130–151. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marx, A. E., & Stanat, P. (2012). Reading comprehension of immigrant students in Germany: Research evidence on determinants and target points for intervention. Reading & Writing, 25(8), 1929–1945. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McCarthy, F. E., & Vickers, M. H. (Eds.). (2012). Refugee and immigrant students: Achieving equity in education. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
  26. Murat, M., & Frederic, P. (2015). Institutions, culture and background: The school performance of immigrant students. Education Economics, 23(5), 612–630. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013a). Do immigrant students’ reading skills depend on how long they have been in their new country? (PISA in Focus, No. 29). Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013b). What can immigrant students tell us about the quality of education systems? (PISA in Focus, No. 33). Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  29. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). PISA 2015 results, Excellence and equity in education (Vol. I). Paris: OECD Publishing. Google Scholar
  30. Petrelli, M., & Winkler, A. (2008, September 8). USA: We’re number 20! National Review. Retrieved from
  31. Scardino, M. (2008, December 11). The Olympics of education. The Guardian. Retrieved from
  32. Schleicher, A. (2006). Where immigrant students succeed: A comparative review of performance and engagement in PISA 2003. Intercultural Education, 17(5), 507–516. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schnepf, S. V. (2007). Immigrants’ educational disadvantage: An examination across ten countries. Journal of Population Economics, 20, 527–545. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shapira, M. (2012). An exploration of differences in mathematics attainment among immigrant pupils in 18 OECD countries. European Educational Research Journal, 11(1), 68–95. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shpaizman, I., & Kogut, T. (2010). Can perceptions of similarity reduce the ability to see the other’s needs? The case of immigrant students’ integration policy. Social Psychology Education, 13(3), 425–440. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Simms, K. (2012). A hierarchical examination of the immigrant achievement gap: The additional explanatory power of nationality and educational selectivity over traditional explorations of race and socioeconomic status. Journal of Advanced Academics, 23(1), 72–98. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. United Nations Populations Division. (2015). International migration stock data 2015. Retrieved from
  38. Van Houtte, M., & Stevens, P. A. (2010). School ethnic composition and aspirations of immigrant students in Belgium. British Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 209–237. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Veerman, G. (2015). The relationship between ethnic diversity and classroom disruption in the context of migration policies. Educational Studies, 41(1–2), 209–225. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Volante, L. (Ed.). (2016). The intersection of international achievement testing and educational Policy: Global perspectives on large-scale reform. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Volante, L., Klinger, D., Bilgili, O., & Siegel, M. (2017). The immigrant (dis)advantage. Education Canada, 57(2). Retrieved from

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Utrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationBrock UniversityHamiltonCanada
  3. 3.Waikato UniversityHamiltonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations