Skip to main content

Executive Functions and Their Relationship with Interaction Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Computer Science and Engineering—Theory and Applications

Abstract

Human Factors have been for several decades one of the main factors of contention when trying to develop a usable system. From physical to cognitive characteristics and everything in between, the attributes of a user can impact on several aspects of the design of said software. Although there are guidelines for some characteristics there is no definitive model with what characteristics to consider, what metrics to use and their effect on the interface. In this chapter we talk about the effect of some of the executive functions (working memory and cognitive flexibility) depending on the interface design pattern used, and the relationship with the cognitive load produced by the design pattern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bauer F, Bolliet L, Helms HJ (1968) Report of a conference sponsored by the NATO Science Committee. NATO Softw Eng Conf 1968:8

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jacko JA (2012) Human computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies, and emerging applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Card SK, Newell A, Moran TP (1983) The psychology of human-computer interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kim GJ (2015) Human-computer interaction: fundamentals and practice. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chisholm W, Vanderheiden G, Jacobs I (2001) Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0. Interact ACM 8(4):35–54

    Google Scholar 

  6. Leidner DE, Jarvenpaa SL (1995) The use of information technology to enhance management school education: a theoretical view. MIS Q 19:265–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Byrne MD (2001) ACT-R/PM and menu selection: applying a cognitive architecture to HCI. Int J Hum Comput Stud 55(1):41–84

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Kieras D (1994) GOMS modeling of user interfaces using NGOMSL. In: Conference companion on human factors in computing systems. ACM, pp 371–372

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kieras DE, Meyer DE (1997) An overview of the EPIC architecture for cognition and performance with application to human-computer interaction. Hum Comput Interact 12(4):391–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson JR (1996) ACT: a simple theory of complex cognition. Am Psychol 51(4):355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Byrne MD (2001) ACT-R/PM and menu selection: applying a cognitive architecture to HCI. Int J Hum Comput Stud 55(1):41–84

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Schneider-Hufschmidt M, Malinowski U, Kuhme T (1993) State of the art in adaptive user interfaces. In: Adaptive user interfaces: principles and practice. Elsevier, p 3

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stephanidis C, Paramythis A, Sfyrakis M, Stergiou A, Maou N, Leventis A et al (1998) Adaptable and adaptive user interfaces for disabled users in the AVANTI project. In: Intelligence in services and networks: technology for ubiquitous telecom services, pp 153–166

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gajos K, Weld DS (2004) SUPPLE: automatically generating user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on intelligent user interfaces. ACM, pp 93–100

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jurado MB, Rosselli M (2007) The elusive nature of executive functions: a review of our current understanding. Neuropsychol Rev 17(3):213–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Delis DC (2012) Delis-rating of executive functions. Pearson, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  17. Miller EK, Cohen JD (2001) An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci 24(1):167–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lezak MD (1995) Neuropsychological assessment, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, p 49

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pribram KH (1973) The primate frontal cortex—executive of the brain. Psychophysiology of the frontal lobes. Academic, New York, pp 293–314

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Luria AR (1973) The working brain: an introduction to neuropsychology. Basic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hongwanishkul D, Happaney KR, Lee WS, Zelazo PD (2005) Assessment of hot and cool executive function in young children: age-related changes and individual differences. Dev. Neuropsychol 28(2):617–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Godefroy O, Cabaret M, Petit-Chenal V, Pruvo JP, Rousseaux M (1999) Control functions of the frontal lobe: modularity of the central-supervisory system. Cortex 35:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dix A (2004) Human computer interaction. Pearson Education, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mayer RE, Moreno R (2003) Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educ Psychol 38(1):43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Miyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, Witzki AH, Howerter A, Wager TD (2000) The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol 41(1):49–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sweller J (1988) Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cogn Sci 12:257–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ayres P, Sweller J (2005) The split-attention principle in multimedia learning. In Mayer RE (ed) The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 135–146

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chandler P, Sweller J (1992) The split-attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. Br J Educ Psychol 62:233–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ayres PL (2001) Systematic mathematical errors and cognitive load. Contemp Educ Psychol 26:227–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bratfisch O, Borg G, Dornic S (1972) Perceived item-difficulty in three tests of intellectual performance capacity (Tech. Rep. No. 29). Institute of Applied Psychology, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  31. Paas FG (1992) Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: a cognitive-load approach. J Educ Psychol 84:429–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Britton BK, Tesser A (1982) Effects of prior knowledge on use of cognitive capacity in three complex cognitive tasks. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav 21:421–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Van Gerven PWM, Paas F, van Merriënboer JJG, Schmidt HG (2004) Memory load and the cognitive pupillary response in aging. Psychophysiology 41:167–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Paas F, Ayres P, Pachman M (2008) Assessment of cognitive load in multimedia learning: theory, methods and applications. In: Robinson DH, Schraw G (eds) Recent innovations in educational technology that facilitate student learning. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, pp 11–35

    Google Scholar 

  35. Antonenko P, Paas F, Grabner R, van Gog T (2010) Using electronencephalography to measure cognitive load. Educ Psychol Rev 22:425–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Van Gog T, Rikers RMJP, Ayres P (2008) Data collection and analysis: assessment of complex performance. In Spector JM, Merrill MD, van Merriënboer JJG, Driscoll MP (eds) Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. Routledge, London/England, pp 783–789

    Google Scholar 

  37. American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). American Psychiatric Publishing, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hill EL (2004) Executive dysfunction in autism. Trends Cogn Sci 8(1):26–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Korkman M, Kirk U, Kemp S (2007) NEPSY-II: clinical and interpretive manual. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wechsler D (2003) Wechsler intelligence scale for children-WISC-IV. Psychological Corporation

    Google Scholar 

  41. Laurie-Rose C et al (2014) Measuring perceived mental workload in children. Am J Psychol 127(1):107–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrés Mejía Figueroa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mejía Figueroa, A., Juárez Ramírez, J.R., Saldaña Sage, D. (2018). Executive Functions and Their Relationship with Interaction Design. In: Sanchez, M., Aguilar, L., Castañón-Puga, M., Rodríguez-Díaz, A. (eds) Computer Science and Engineering—Theory and Applications. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 143. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74060-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74060-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74059-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74060-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics