Advertisement

Sustainability Performance Measurement

A Preliminary Classification Framework of Models and Indicators
  • Dries CouckuytEmail author
  • Amy Van Looy
  • Manu De Backer
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 308)

Abstract

In this position paper we focus on the diversity of sustainability measurements. Based on existing research on performance measurement, we propose a preliminary classification framework summarizing sustainability models and indicators. By describing illustrative examples, we claim that several models and indicators can be distinguished with their own peculiarities. Having such a framework is interesting for both academia and business to structure the range of models and indicators and to ultimately select the appropriate sustainability measurement approach. The proposed framework should be validated by further research.

Keywords

Sustainability Green BPM Performance measurement 

References

  1. 1.
    Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., Reijners, H.A.: Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33143-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Elkington, J.: Cannibals with Forks: the Triple Bottom Line of Sustainable Development, 1st edn. Capstone Publishing, Oxford (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ghose, A., Hoesch-Klohe, K., Hinsche, L., Le, L.-S.: Green business process management: a research agenda. Australas. J. Inf. Syst. 16(2), 103–117 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Global Reporting Initiative. https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/gri-standards-download-center. Accessed 30 May 2017
  5. 5.
    Gohar, S.R., Indulska, M.: Business Process Management: Saving the Planet? In: Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Adelaide, pp. 1–14 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hansen, E.G., Schaltegger, S.: The sustainability balanced scorecard: a systematic review of architectures. J. Bus. Ethics 133(2), 193–221 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    International Organization for Standardization (ISO): ISO 14001:2015 Environmental Management Systems – Requirements with Guidance for Use. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:14001:ed-3:v1:en
  8. 8.
    Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, 1st edn. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1996)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kitchenham, B.: Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele University, Keele, Technical report, pp. 1–28 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Krajnc, D., Glavič, P.: A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development. Res. Conserv. Recycl. 43, 189–208 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Magdaleno, A.M., Duboc, L., Betz, S.: How to Incorporate Sustainability into Business Process Management Lifecycle? In: Dumas, M., Fantinato, M. (eds.) BPM 2016. LNBIP, vol. 281, pp. 440–443. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58457-7_32 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Möller, A., Schaltegger, S.: The sustainability balanced scorecard as a framework for eco-efficiency analysis. J. Ind. Ecol. 9(4), 73–83 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nowak, A., Leymann, F., Schumm, D.: The differences and commonalities between green and conventional business process management. In: International Conference on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing Proceedings, pp. 569–576. IEEE, Sydney (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Opitz, N., Erek, K., Langkau, T., Kolbe, L., Zarnekow, R.: Kick-starting green business process management – suitable modeling languages and key processes for green performance measurement. In: Americas Conference on Information Systems Proceedings, Seattle, pp. 1–10 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Opitz, N., Krüp, H., Kolbe, L.M.: Green business process management - a definition and research framework. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences Proceedings, pp. 3808–3817. IEEE, Waikoloa (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reijers, H.A., Mansar, S.L.: Best practices in business process redesign: an overview and qualitative evaluation of successful redesign heuristics. Omega 33(4), 283–306 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reiter, M., Fettke, P., Loos, P.: Towards green business process management: concept and implementation of an artifact to reduce the energy consumption of business processes. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences Proceedings, pp. 885–894. IEEE, Waikoloa (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Seidel, S., vom Brocke, J., Recker, J.: Call for action: investigating the role of business process management in green IS. In: All Sprouts Content, pp. 1–6. AISeL (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stolze, C., Semmler, G., Thomas, O.: Sustainability in business process management research - a literature review. In: Americas Conference on Information Systems Proceedings, pp. 1–10. AISeL, Seattle (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Van Looy, A., Shafagatova, A.: Business process performance measurement: a structured literature review of indicators, measures and metrics. SpringerPlus 5(1), 1–24 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business Informatics and Operations Management, Faculty of Economics and Business AdministrationGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Management Information Systems, Faculty of Economics and Business AdministrationUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium

Personalised recommendations