E-Government Services: Comparing Real and Expected User Behavior
E-government web services are becoming increasingly popular among citizens of various countries. Usually, to receive a service, the user has to perform a sequence of steps. This sequence of steps forms a service rendering process. Using process mining techniques this process can be discovered from the information system’s event logs. A discovered process model of a real user behavior can assist in the analysis of service usability. Thus, for popular and well-designed services this process model will coincide with a reference process model of the expected user behavior. While for other services the observed real behavior and the modeled expected behavior can differ significantly. The main aim of this work is to suggest an approach for the comparison of process models and evaluate its applicability when applied to real-life e-government services.
KeywordsE-government services BPM mining Increasing citizen acceptance Business process quality Process discovery Comparing process models BPMN (Business Process Model and Notation)
This work was supported by the Basic Research Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics and funded by RFBR and Moscow city Government according to the Research project No 15-37-70008 “mol_a_mos”.
- 1.Gebba, T., Zakaria, M.: E-government in Egypt: An analysis of practices and challenges. Int. J. Bus. Res. Dev. 4(2), 11–25 (2012)Google Scholar
- 7.Weijters, A., Ribeiro, J.: Flexible heuristics miner (FHM). In: IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM 2011), Paris, France, IEEE. pp. 310–317, April 2011Google Scholar
- 10.Günther, C.W., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Fuzzy mining – adaptive process simplification based on multi-perspective metrics. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 328–343. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75183-0_24 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.OMG: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN). Object Management Group, formal/2013-12-09 (2013)Google Scholar
- 13.Kalenkova, A., de Leoni, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Discovering, analyzing and enhancing BPMN models using ProM. In: Proceedings of the BPM Demo Sessions 2014 Co-located with the 12th International Conference on Business Process Management, p. 36 (2014)Google Scholar
- 15.Adriansyah, A., van Dongen, B., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Conformance checking using cost-based fitness analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 15th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, EDOC 2011, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 55–64. IEEE Computer Society (2011)Google Scholar
- 18.Ivanov, S., Kalenkova, A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: BPMNDiffViz: a tool for BPMN models comparison. In: Proceedings of the BPM Demo Session 2015 Co-located with the 13th International Conference on Business Process Management. pp. 35–39 (2015)Google Scholar
- 19.Muehlen, M., Recker, J.: How much language is enough? Theoretical and practical use of the business process modeling notation. In: Bellahsène, Z., Léonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5074, pp. 465–479. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69534-9_35 CrossRefGoogle Scholar