Advertisement

Lightweight Process Support with Spreadsheet-Driven Processes: A Case Study in the Finance Domain

  • Michael StachEmail author
  • Rüdiger Pryss
  • Maximilian Schnitzlein
  • Tim Mohring
  • Martin Jurisch
  • Manfred Reichert
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 308)

Abstract

The use of process management technology constitutes a salient factor for a multitude of business domains as it particularly addresses the flexibility demands of the digital enterprise. Still, spreadsheet applications are more likely to be used in many scenarios in which process management technology appears to be a more appropriate solution. Especially in the context of human-centric and knowledge-intensive processes, spreadsheets are widely used, even if more business-tailored applications exist. For example, financial service providers, like banks or insurers, prefer spreadsheet applications for accomplishing their daily business. However, this kind of usage reveals drawbacks when working collaboratively based on the same spreadsheet document. To remedy these drawbacks, we suggest the use of spreadsheet-driven processes, which shall combine the advantages of traditional process management technology with the ones of spreadsheets. Using a sophisticated scenario from the financial domain, this paper shows how spreadsheet-driven processes improve collaborative work, as required in the context of business processes, significantly. Moreover, a proof-of-concept prototype is presented to evaluate the approach in practice. Altogether, first results indicate that spreadsheet-driven processes may be a promising technical solution for everyday business involving human resources.

Keywords

Human-centric Spreadsheet-driven process Financial field 

References

  1. 1.
    Burnett, M., et al.: End-user software engineering with assertions in the spreadsheet paradigm. In: 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 93–103. IEEE (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dadam, P., et al.: From ADEPT to AristaFlow BPM suite: a research vision has become reality. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Sadiq, S., Leymann, F. (eds.) BPM 2009. LNBIP, vol. 43, pp. 529–531. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12186-9_50 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ellis, C., Nutt, G.: Office information systems and computer science. ACM Comput. Surv. 12(1), 27–60 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ellis, C., et al.: Dynamic change within workflow systems. In: Proceedings of Conference on Organizational Computing Systems, pp. 10–21. ACM (1995)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eppler, M., et al.: Improving knowledge intensive processes through an enterprise knowledge medium. In: Meckel, M., Schmid, B.F. (eds.) Kommunikationsmanagement im Wandel, pp. 371–389. Springer, Wiesbaden (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Garleanu, N., Pedersen, L.: Liquidity and risk management. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Korherr, B., List, B.: Extending the EPC and the BPMN with business process goals and performance measures. In: ICEIS, vol. 3, pp. 287–294 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Küng, P., Hagen, C.: The fruits of business process management: an experience report from a Swiss bank. Bus. Process Manag. J. 13(4), 477–487 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lapourtre, C., Rolf, G.: Distributed office automation system with specific task assignment among workstations. US Patent 5,136,708 (1992)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mittnik, S.: Solvency ii calibrations: Where curiosity meets spuriosity. Center for Quantitative Risk Analysis (CEQURA), Department of Statistics, University of Munich, Munich (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mundbrod, N., Reichert, M.: Process-aware task management support for knowledge-intensive business processes: findings, challenges, requirements. In: 3rd International Workshop on Adaptive Case Management and Other Non-workflow Approaches to BPM. IEEE Computer Society Press (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nicolas, M., Firzli, J.: A critique of the basel committee on banking supervision. Revue Analyse Financière, 10 November 2011Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Olson, M., Lucas Jr., H.: The impact of office automation on the organization: some implications for research and practice. Commun. ACM 25(11), 838–847 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reichert, M., Weber, B.: Enabling Flexibility in Process-Aware Information Systems: Challenges, Methods, Technologies. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schobel, J., Pryss, R., Wipp, W., Schickler, M., Reichert, M.: A mobile service engine enabling complex data collection applications. In: Sheng, Q.Z., Stroulia, E., Tata, S., Bhiri, S. (eds.) ICSOC 2016. LNCS, vol. 9936, pp. 626–633. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46295-0_42 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Spremic, M., et al.: IT and business process performance management: case study of ITIL implementation in finance service industry. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, pp. 243–250. IEEE (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Stach
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rüdiger Pryss
    • 1
  • Maximilian Schnitzlein
    • 1
  • Tim Mohring
    • 1
  • Martin Jurisch
    • 2
  • Manfred Reichert
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Databases and Information SystemsUlm UniversityUlmGermany
  2. 2.AristaFlow GmbHNeu-UlmGermany

Personalised recommendations