Skip to main content

Translation of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Swedish Politics

Part of the Health, Technology and Society book series (HTE)

Abstract

In this chapter, the political understanding—or translation—of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is analysed within the context of the Swedish parliament. This is achieved with help from an actor network approach, using motions written by parliamentary politicians during the time period 1980–2015. The main findings suggest that there are two types of translations. The first is focused on public health issues in which CAM is presented as a potential contribution to problems such as long-term sick leaves. The second is focused on more specific CAM issues, such as legal constraints and lack of knowledge, which might delimit the use and practice of CAM. In general, the debate is in favour of CAM and is dominated by liberal and conservative parties. It is also dominated by ideals of freedom of choice and free markets, although ideals of social justice also are recurrent. Another finding is that the political understanding of CAM follows scientific and medical norms.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-73939-7_7
  • Chapter length: 27 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-73939-7
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Notes

  1. 1.

    Several of these parties have changed their names during the debate or have longer full names. In the chapter, I have chosen the name used in everyday language and/or dominating during the time period in focus.

References

  • Angell, M., & Kassirer, J. P. (1998). Alternative medicine – The risks of untested and unregulated remedies. New England Journal of Medicine, 339(12), 839–841.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bergqvist, K., Yngwe, M. A., & Lundberg, O. (2013). Understanding the role of welfare state characteristics for health and inequalities – An analytical review. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 1234.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Boas, T. C., & Gans-Morse, J. (2009). Neoliberalism: From new liberal philosophy to anti-liberal slogan. Studies in Comparative International Development, 44(2), 137–161.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brenton, J., & Elliott, S. (2014). Undoing gender? The case of complementary and alternative medicine. Sociology of Health & Illness, 36(1), 91–107.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Broom, A., Meurk, C., Adams, J., & Sibbritt, D. (2014). My health, my responsibility? Complementary medicine and self (health) care. Journal of Sociology, 50(4), 515–530.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation – Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St-Brieuc Bay. The Sociological Review, 32(1_suppl), 196–233.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • CAMDOC Alliance. (2010). The regulatory status of complementary and alternative medicine for medical doctors in Europe. Retrieved November 13, 2017, from http://www.camdoc.eu/Pdf/CAMDOCRegulatoryStatus8_10.pdf.

  • Clarke, D. B., Doel, M. A., & Segrott, J. (2004). No alternative? The regulation and professionalization of complementary and alternative medicine in the United Kingdom. Health & Place, 10(4), 329–338.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrera, M. (1996). The ‘southern model’ of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1), 107–111.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, P., & Ward, A. (1994). Complementary medicine in Europe. British Medical Journal, 309(6947), 107–111.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (2009). Capitalism and freedom: Fortieth anniversary edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M., & Friedman, R. D. (1990). Free to choose: A personal statement. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fries, C. J. (2008). Governing the health of the hybrid self: Integrative medicine, neoliberalism, and the shifting politics of subjectivity. Health Sociology Review, 17(4), 353–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1996). Aramis, or, the love of technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor network – Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5(4), 379–393.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Magnussen, J., Vrangbaeck, K., Saltman, R. B., & Martinussen, P. E. (2009). Introduction: The Nordic model of health care. In J. Magnussen, K. Vrangbaeck, & R. B. Saltman (Eds.), Nordic health care systems – Recent reforms and current policy challenges (pp. 3–20). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, S. (2001). Neoliberalism and health care. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 25(2), 82–89.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Palier, B. (2006). Hälso- och sjukvårdens reformer – En internationell jämförelse. Stockholm: Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saks, M. (1999). The wheel turns? Professionalisation and alternative medicine in Britain. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 13(2), 129–138.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S., & Ernst, E. (2008). Trick or treatment? Alternative medicine on trial. London: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorsen, D. E. (2011). The neoliberal challenge – What is neoliberalism. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 2(2), 188–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, S., Kelner, M., Wellman, B., & Boon, H. (2004). Moving forward? Complementary and alternative practitioners seeking self-regulation. Sociology of Health & Illness, 26(2), 216–241.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Werneke, U., Earl, J., Seydel, C., Horn, O., Crichton, P., & Fannon, D. (2004). Potential health risks of complementary alternative medicines in cancer patients. British Journal of Cancer, 90(2), 408–413.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wiesener, S., Falkenberg, T., Hegyi, G., Hök, J., di Sarsina, P. R., & Fønnebø, V. (2012). Legal status and regulation of complementary and alternative medicine in Europe. Forschende Komplementärmedizin, 19(2), 29–36.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Danell, JA.B. (2018). Translation of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Swedish Politics. In: Brosnan, C., Vuolanto, P., Danell, JA. (eds) Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Health, Technology and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73939-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73939-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73938-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73939-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)