Advertisement

Translation of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Swedish Politics

  • Jenny-Ann Brodin Danell
Chapter
Part of the Health, Technology and Society book series (HTE)

Abstract

In this chapter, the political understanding—or translation—of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is analysed within the context of the Swedish parliament. This is achieved with help from an actor network approach, using motions written by parliamentary politicians during the time period 1980–2015. The main findings suggest that there are two types of translations. The first is focused on public health issues in which CAM is presented as a potential contribution to problems such as long-term sick leaves. The second is focused on more specific CAM issues, such as legal constraints and lack of knowledge, which might delimit the use and practice of CAM. In general, the debate is in favour of CAM and is dominated by liberal and conservative parties. It is also dominated by ideals of freedom of choice and free markets, although ideals of social justice also are recurrent. Another finding is that the political understanding of CAM follows scientific and medical norms.

References

  1. Angell, M., & Kassirer, J. P. (1998). Alternative medicine – The risks of untested and unregulated remedies. New England Journal of Medicine, 339(12), 839–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergqvist, K., Yngwe, M. A., & Lundberg, O. (2013). Understanding the role of welfare state characteristics for health and inequalities – An analytical review. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boas, T. C., & Gans-Morse, J. (2009). Neoliberalism: From new liberal philosophy to anti-liberal slogan. Studies in Comparative International Development, 44(2), 137–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brenton, J., & Elliott, S. (2014). Undoing gender? The case of complementary and alternative medicine. Sociology of Health & Illness, 36(1), 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Broom, A., Meurk, C., Adams, J., & Sibbritt, D. (2014). My health, my responsibility? Complementary medicine and self (health) care. Journal of Sociology, 50(4), 515–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation – Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St-Brieuc Bay. The Sociological Review, 32(1_suppl), 196–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. CAMDOC Alliance. (2010). The regulatory status of complementary and alternative medicine for medical doctors in Europe. Retrieved November 13, 2017, from http://www.camdoc.eu/Pdf/CAMDOCRegulatoryStatus8_10.pdf.
  8. Clarke, D. B., Doel, M. A., & Segrott, J. (2004). No alternative? The regulation and professionalization of complementary and alternative medicine in the United Kingdom. Health & Place, 10(4), 329–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Ferrera, M. (1996). The ‘southern model’ of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1), 107–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fisher, P., & Ward, A. (1994). Complementary medicine in Europe. British Medical Journal, 309(6947), 107–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Friedman, M. (2009). Capitalism and freedom: Fortieth anniversary edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Friedman, M., & Friedman, R. D. (1990). Free to choose: A personal statement. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  14. Fries, C. J. (2008). Governing the health of the hybrid self: Integrative medicine, neoliberalism, and the shifting politics of subjectivity. Health Sociology Review, 17(4), 353–367.Google Scholar
  15. Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Latour, B. (1996). Aramis, or, the love of technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor network – Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5(4), 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Magnussen, J., Vrangbaeck, K., Saltman, R. B., & Martinussen, P. E. (2009). Introduction: The Nordic model of health care. In J. Magnussen, K. Vrangbaeck, & R. B. Saltman (Eds.), Nordic health care systems – Recent reforms and current policy challenges (pp. 3–20). Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  20. McGregor, S. (2001). Neoliberalism and health care. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 25(2), 82–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Palier, B. (2006). Hälso- och sjukvårdens reformer – En internationell jämförelse. Stockholm: Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting.Google Scholar
  22. Saks, M. (1999). The wheel turns? Professionalisation and alternative medicine in Britain. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 13(2), 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Singh, S., & Ernst, E. (2008). Trick or treatment? Alternative medicine on trial. London: Bantam.Google Scholar
  24. Thorsen, D. E. (2011). The neoliberal challenge – What is neoliberalism. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 2(2), 188–214.Google Scholar
  25. Welsh, S., Kelner, M., Wellman, B., & Boon, H. (2004). Moving forward? Complementary and alternative practitioners seeking self-regulation. Sociology of Health & Illness, 26(2), 216–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Werneke, U., Earl, J., Seydel, C., Horn, O., Crichton, P., & Fannon, D. (2004). Potential health risks of complementary alternative medicines in cancer patients. British Journal of Cancer, 90(2), 408–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wiesener, S., Falkenberg, T., Hegyi, G., Hök, J., di Sarsina, P. R., & Fønnebø, V. (2012). Legal status and regulation of complementary and alternative medicine in Europe. Forschende Komplementärmedizin, 19(2), 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jenny-Ann Brodin Danell
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations