Skip to main content

Shaping of ‘Embodied Expertise’ in Alternative Medicine

  • 471 Accesses

Part of the Health, Technology and Society book series (HTE)

Abstract

By exploring ‘embodied expertise’ in alternative treatments, this chapter endeavours to help us to account for the popularity of alternative medicine. Embodied expertise has been a much-neglected area in healthcare research for alternative medicine compared with ‘negative’ explanations such as studies of practitioners’ (lack of) education, treatment effects and effectiveness, or users’ dissatisfaction with conventional healthcare. Drawing on a concept of expertise different from ‘expert’ and ‘profession’ allows us to identify dimensions such as skills, knowledge, and spatiality developed not only by practitioners but also in the practitioner-user encounter. Based on a study of three of the most popular forms of alternative medicine in Denmark, we demonstrate how these dimensions are central to developing relationships between (1) expert and lay, (2) experience and evidence-based knowledge, and (3) clinic and home. We argue that such relationships develop the embodied expertise of practitioners, as well as that of users of alternative medicine.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-73939-7_11
  • Chapter length: 22 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-73939-7
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

References

  • Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, A. (2005). Linked ecologies: States and universities as environments for professions. Sociological Theory, 23(3), 245–274.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Baarts, C. (2009). Stuck in the middle: Research ethics caught between science and politics. Qualitative Research, 9(4), 1–17.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Baarts, C., & Pedersen, I. K. (2009). Derivative benefits: Exploring the body through complementary and alternative medicine. Sociology of Health & Illness, 31(5), 719–733.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, C. A. (2006). The role of evidence in alternative medicine: Contrasting biomedical and anthropological approaches. Social Science & Medicine, 62(11), 2646–2657.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Beyerstein, B. L. (2001). Alternative medicine and common errors of reasoning. Academic Medicine, 76(3), 230–237.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Boon, H., Brown, J. B., Gavin, A., Kennard, M. A., & Stewart, M. (1999). Breast cancer survivors’ perceptions of complementary/alternative medicine (CAM): Making the decision to use or not to use. Qualitative Health Research, 9(5), 639–653.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Broom, A., & Tovey, P. (2008). Therapeutic pluralism: Exploring the experiences of cancer patients and professionals. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan, C. (2015). “Quackery” in the academy? Professional knowledge, autonomy and the debate over complementary medicine degrees. Sociology, 49(6), 1047–1064.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cant, S., & Sharma, U. (1999). A new medical pluralism? Alternative medicine, doctors, patients and the state. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. M., & Evans, R. (2002). The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, 32(2), 235–296.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. M., & Evans, R. (2007). Rethinking expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Connor, L. H. (2004). Relief, risk and renewal: Mixed therapy regimens in an Australian suburb. Social Science & Medicine, 59(8), 1695–1705.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Coward, R. (1989). The whole truth: The myth of alternative health. London: Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J., & Milligan, C. (2004). Embodying emotion sensing space: Introducing emotional geographies. Social & Cultural Geography, 5(4), 523–532.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Druss, B. G., & Rosenheck, R. A. (1999). Association between use of unconventional therapies and conventional medical services. JAMA, 282(7), 651–656.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ekholm, O., Christensen, A. I., Davidsen, M., & Juel, K. (2015). Alternativ behandling. Resultater fra Sundheds- og sygelighedsundersøgelsen. Copenhagen: SIF, Syddansk Universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekholm, O., & Kjøller, M. (2007). Brugen af alternativ behandling i Danmark: resultater fra den nationalt repræsentative Sundheds- og sygelighedsundersøgelse 2005. Tidsskrift for Forskning i Sygdom og Samfund, 6, 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyal, G. (2013). For a sociology of expertise: The social origins of the autism epidemic. American Journal of Sociology, 118(4), 863–907.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fadlon, J. (2004). Meridians, chakras and psycho-neuro-immunology: The dematerializing body and the domestication of alternative medicine. Body & Society, 10(4), 69–86.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Foote-Ardah, C. E. (2004). Sociocultural barriers to the use of complementary and alternative medicine for HIV. Qualitative Health Research, 14(5), 593–611.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gale, N. K. (2011). From body-talk to body-stories: Body work in complementary and alternative medicine. Sociology of Health & Illness, 33(2), 237–251.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Givati, A., & Hatton, K. (2015). Traditional acupuncturists and higher education in Britain: The dual, paradoxical impact of biomedical alignment on the holistic view. Social Science & Medicine, 131, 173–180.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hycner, R. H. (1999). Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. In A. Bryman & R. Burgess (Eds.), Qualitative research (Vol. III, pp. 143–164). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannessen, H. (2007). Body praxis and the networks of powers. Anthropology & Medicine, 13(3), 267–278.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lee-Treweek, G. (2002). Trust in complementary medicine: The case of cranial osteopathy. The Sociological Review, 50(1), 48–68.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D. (2013). Risk and emotion: Towards an alternative theoretical perspective. Health, Risk & Society, 15(8), 634–647.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, M. (1996). Ignoring science: Discourses of ignorance in the public understanding of science. In A. Irwin & B. Wynne (Eds.), Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology (pp. 107–125). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mizrachi, N., & Shuval, J. T. (2005). Between formal and enacted policy: Changing the contours of boundaries. Social Science & Medicine, 60(7), 1649–1660.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ni, H., Simile, C., & Hardy, A. M. (2002). Utilization of complementary and alternative medicine by United States adults: Results from the 1999 national health interview survey. Medical Care, 40(4), 335–358.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nissen, N. (2013). Women’s bodies and women’s lives in western herbal medicine in the UK. Medical Anthropology: Cross-Cultural Studies in Health and Illness, 32(1), 75–91.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ong, C. K., & Banks, B. (2003). Complementary and alternative medicine: The consumer perspective. London: The Prince of Wales’s Foundation for Integrated Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, S. (Ed.). (2017). Spatial sociology: Relational space after the turn. Current Sociology, Monograph 2, 65(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, C., Baarts, C., Launsø, L., & Verhoef, M. (2009). Evaluating complex health interventions: A critical analysis of the ‘outcomes’ concept. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 9(1), 1–11.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, I. K. (2012). Kampen med kroppen. Alternativ behandling i et bruger- og samfundsperspektiv [The Body in Borderland: Alternative Medicine in a Societal and Users’ Perspective]. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, I. K. (2013). ‘It can do no harm’: Body maintenance and modification in alternative medicine acknowledged as a non-risk health regimen. Social Science & Medicine, 90, 56–62.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, I. K. (2014). Lytninger i alternativ behandling – en fænomenologisk analyse [Listenings in session-based alternative medicine: A phenomenological analysis]. Tidsskriftet Antropologi, 69, 45–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, I. K. (2017, October 14). Striving for self-improvement: Alternative medicine considered as technologies of enhancement. Social Theory & Health. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-017-0052-3.

  • Pedersen, I. K., & Baarts, C. (2010). ‘Fantastic hands’ – But no evidence: The construction of expertise by users of CAM. Social Science & Medicine, 71(6), 1068–1075.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, I. K., Hansen, V. H., & Grünenberg, K. (2016). The emergence of trust in clinics of alternative medicine. Sociology of Health & Illness, 38(1), 43–57.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Saks, M. (2001). Alternative medicine and the health care division of labour: Present trends and future prospects. Current Sociology, 49(3), 119–134.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sered, S., & Agigian, A. (2008). Holistic sickening: Breast cancer and the discursive worlds of complementary and alternative practitioners. Sociology of Health and Illness, 30(4), 616–631.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sointu, E. (2013). Complementary and alternative medicines, embodied subjectivity and experiences of healing. Health, 17(5), 530–545.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (2004). Intensities of feeling: Towards a spatial politics of affect. Geografiska Annaler, 86(1), 57–78.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wahlberg, A. (2007). A quackery with a difference: New medical pluralism and the problem of “dangerous practitioners” in the United Kingdom. Social Science & Medicine, 65(11), 2307–2326.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ziguras, C. (2004). Self-care: Embodiment, personal autonomy and the shaping of health consciousness. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pedersen, I.K., Baarts, C.A. (2018). Shaping of ‘Embodied Expertise’ in Alternative Medicine. In: Brosnan, C., Vuolanto, P., Danell, JA. (eds) Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Health, Technology and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73939-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73939-7_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73938-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73939-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)