Advertisement

Learning New Mathematics from Old

Euclid’s Art After Bath
  • Snezana Lawrence
Chapter
Part of the ICME-13 Monographs book series (ICME13Mo)

Abstract

This chapter presents a project for the learning of mathematics based on its relationship with art, conducted with secondary mathematics teachers in training. It aimed to use a reorientation process in order to reenergize students’ interest in mathematics by giving them a problem that puts a mathematical concept under a new light, thus showing them different ways of teaching. The initial images were chosen by the author (Rafael’s The School of Athens, and de’Barbari’s Luca Pacioli, both containing mathematical diagrams referring to Euclid’s Elements, book XIII) and their interpretations were investigated offering new insights related to the Elements. Students were then introduced to the project by putting mathematics in historical and cultural context through its relationship with art, and encouraged to seek new information in an area of mathematics they were already familiar with. The project’s results relate to both the historical analysis of these images, and the use of such research to create opportunities to engage with the study of mathematics.

Keywords

Euclid’s Elements Rafael Pacioli de’Barbari Platonic solids Adelard of Bath Leonardo da Vinci 

References

  1. Baldasso, R. (2010). Portrait of Luca Pacioli and Disciple: A new, mathematical look. The Art Bulletin, 92(1–2), 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyer, C. (1991). A history of mathematics. London: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, T. (2011). Mathematics education and subjectivity: Cultures and cultural renewal. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campanus, J. (1482). Euclid’s Elements. Venice: Illustrations and production by Erhard Ratdolt.Google Scholar
  5. da Vinci, Leonardo. (1478–1518). Codex Arundel. MSS British Library, 263, f215.Google Scholar
  6. Duvernoy, S. (2008). Leonardo and theoretical mathematics. In K. Williams (Ed.), Nexus Network Journal, 10(1), pp. 39–49. Basel: Birkhäuser.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fried, N. M. (2008). Between public and private: Where students’ mathematical selves reside. In L. Radford, G. Schubring, & F. Seeger (Eds.), Semiotics in mathematics education: Epistemology, history, classroom, and culture (pp. 121–137). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  8. Furinghetti, F. (2007). Teacher education through the history of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 131–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gamba, E. (1999). Pittura e storia della scienza. La ragione e il metodo. Milan: Electa.Google Scholar
  10. Haas, R. (2012). Raphael’s School of Athens: A theorem in a painting? Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 2(2), 2–26.Google Scholar
  11. Heath, T. L. (1908). The thirteen books of Euclid’s Elements, translated from the text of Heiberg etc. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Heilbron, J. L. (2000). Geometry civilized: History, culture, and technique. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  13. Landrus, M. (2001). Luca Pacioli, Leonardo and the harmonium mundi. In A.-T. Tymieniecka (Ed.), Analecta Husserliana (Vol. 73, pp. 39–49). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Lawrence, S. (2009). What works in the classroom—Project on the history of mathematics and the collaborative teaching practice. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne, & F. Arzarello (Eds.), Proceedings of CERME 6 (pp. 2742–2751). Lyon: Institut National de Reserche Pédagogique. Google Scholar
  15. Lawrence, S. (2013). Meno, his paradox, and the incommensurable segments for teachers. Mathematics Today, 49(2), 84–85.Google Scholar
  16. Lawrence, S. (2016). The old teacher Euclid: And his science in the art of finding one’s mathematical voice. MENON: Journal of Educational Research (2nd Thematic Issue), 146–158.Google Scholar
  17. London Mathematical Society (LMS). (2013). Advancing women in mathematics: Good practice in UK university departments. https://www.lms.ac.uk/sites/lms.ac.uk/files/LMS-BTL-17Report_0.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2017.
  18. Mackinnon, N. (1993). The portrait of Fra Luca Pacioli. The Mathematical Gazette, 77(479), 130–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meliacin Master. (1309–1316). Scholastic miscellany. French MSS, Burney 275, British Library.Google Scholar
  20. Pacioli, L. (1494). Summa de arithmetica, geometria, proportioniet proportionalita. Venice: Paganino Paganini.Google Scholar
  21. Plato. (2009). Meno and other dialogues (R. Waterfiled, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Proclus. (1560). In primum Euclidis Elementorum librum commentariorum … libri IIII (F. Barozzi, Trans.). Padua.Google Scholar
  23. Sanders, P. (1990). The regular polyhedra in Renaissance science and philosophy (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). London: University of London (Warburg Institute).Google Scholar
  24. Swetz, F. J. (2014). Mathematical treasure: Pacioli’s elements of Euclid. Convergence. http://www.maa.org/press/periodicals/convergence/mathematical-treasure-paciolis-elements-of-euclid. Accessed 11 August 2017.
  25. Taylor, R. E. (1980). No royal road: Luca Pacioli and his times. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  26. Watson, A. (2015, June). Culture and complexity. Paper presented at the Art of Mathematics Day, Bath Spa University, Bath.Google Scholar
  27. Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2006). Seeing an exercise as a single mathematical object: Using variation to structure sense-making. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(2), 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2009). The Menousa. For the Learning of Mathematics, 29(2), 32–37.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Health, Social Care and EducationAnglia Ruskin UniversityCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations