Abstract
Task analysis in diagnostic medical sonography is a difficult topic in terms of definition, description at the practical level and differences between clinical applications. The present work describes the task analysis of 28 Diagnostic Ultrasound systems in several clinical applications, 15 systems used by sonographers (USA) and 13 systems used by physicians (Europe). The tests performed demonstrated the different workflow peculiarities of sonographers and physicians, showing how the former have a more complex workflow, which puts more stress on the system user interface optimization and ease of use. The sonographers’ workflow, characterized by an average 23% longer scanning time per exam and 88% greater number of controls activated per exam, may also have a greater induction to develop work-related musculoskeletal disorders, with respect to physician users of US systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andreoni, G., Mazzola, M., Matteoli, S., D’Onofrio, S., Forzoni, L.: Ultrasound System typologies, user interfaces and probes design: a review. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics AHFE 2015, Las Vegas, USA, 26–30 July 2015
Ajmal, M., Power, S., Smith, T., Shorten, G.D.: Ergonomic task analysis of ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block: a pilot study. J. Clin. Anesth. 23(1), 35–41 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2010.06.006
Plumptre, I., Mulki, O., Granados, A., Gayle, C., Ahmed, S., Low-Beer, N., Higham, J., Bello, F.: Standardizing bimanual vaginal examination using cognitive task analysis. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 139(1), 114–119 (2017)
Aguirre-Ospina, O.D., González-Maldonado, J.F., Ríos-Medina, Á.M.: Ergonomics in ultrasound-guided nerve blocks. Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología 43(4), 331–339 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcae.2015.06.005
American Registry for Diagnostic Medical Sonography (ARDMS): 2014 ARDMS Musculoskeletal Physician Job Task Analysis – Summary Report (2014). http://www.ardms.org/JTA%20Surveys/JTA%20Executive%20Summary%20Report_%20MSK.pdf
The American Registry of Radiologic Technologists: The Sonography Examination, July 2014. https://www.arrt.org/docs/default-source/discipline-documents/sonography-primary/son-content-specifications.pdf?sfvrsn=16
Simonsen, J.G., Dahlqvist, C., Enquist, H., Nordander, C., Axmon, A., Arvidsson, I.: Assessments of physical workload in sonography tasks using inclinometry, goniometry, and electromyography. Safety Health Work (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2017.08.007
Society and College of Radiographers and British Medical Ultrasound Society: Guidelines For Professional Ultrasound Practice, December 2015. https://www.sor.org/sites/default/files/document-versions/ultrasound_guidance.pdf
American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine: AIUM Practice Parameter for the Performance of Obstetric Ultrasound Examinations (2013). http://www.aium.org/resources/guidelines/obstetric.pdf
American College of Emergency Physicians: Emergency ultrasound guidelines. Ann. Emerg. Med. 53(4), 550–570 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.12.013
Mor-Avi, V., et al.: Current and evolving echocardiographic techniques for the quantitative evaluation of cardiac mechanics: ASE/EAE consensus statement on methodology and indications endorsed by the Japanese Society of Echocardiography. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 24(3), 277–313 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2011.01.015
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Andreoni, G., Delpiano, M., Guraschi, N., Forzoni, L. (2018). Task Analysis of Diagnostic Ultrasound System Use: Comparison Between Sonographers’ and Physicians’ Use in Different Clinical Applications. In: Karwowski, W., Ahram, T. (eds) Intelligent Human Systems Integration. IHSI 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 722. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73888-8_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73888-8_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73887-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73888-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)