Advertisement

Performing the Margins of the New

  • Dirk de BruynEmail author
Chapter
  • 251 Downloads
Part of the Experimental Film and Artists’ Moving Image book series (EFAMI)

Abstract

Enabled by hand-held devices, the digital image has now attained a level of mobility reminiscent of the impact of the transistor radio on popular music in the 1960s. Screens now dominate multiple levels of public and personal space. Light shows, hefty screens and Vjing as real-time performance define popular music events. This pervasive mobility has also regenerated activity in public, multi-screen performances of formalist, graphic imagery by film artists and delivered a renewed interest in a subjugated history that itself formed in 1960s youth culture. The computer’s domestication of avant-garde technique has elicited a response by this avant-garde’s contemporary successors through their continued use of film in performance, foregrounding the ‘perceptual as political’.

References

  1. Curham, L., and L. Ihlein. 2013. (Wo)man With Mirror, User’s Manual. Sydney: Big Fag Press, n.p.Google Scholar
  2. Dzenis, Anna. 2001. Confounding Projections. Real Time Arts 43, June/July.Google Scholar
  3. Fletcher, Paul. 2013. Is Live Cinema Dead? https://www.academia.edu/29580398/Is_Live_Cinema_Dead.
  4. Flusser, Vilém. 2000. Towards a Philosophy of Photography. London: Reaktion.Google Scholar
  5. Gage, John. 1993. Colour and Culture. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  6. Gidal, Peter. 1973. Proposal for Room Film submitted to BFI October 1973, lodged in the British Film and Video Artist’s Study Collection, St. Martin’s School of Art, London.Google Scholar
  7. Gidal, Peter. 1976. Structural Film Anthology. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
  8. Gidal, Peter. 1989. Materialist Film. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Goethe, Johann Wolfgang. 1967. Theory of Colours. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Heidegger, Martin. 1977. The Age of the World-Picture. In The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  11. Heidegger, Martin. 1998. Pathmarks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kandinsky, Wassily. 1982. Complete Writings in Art. London: Faber.Google Scholar
  13. Krauss, Rosalind. 1978. Paul Sharits. Film Culture 89–102.Google Scholar
  14. Land, Edwin. 1964. The Retinex. Scientific American 52 (2): 247–264.Google Scholar
  15. Le Grice, Malcolm. 1977. Abstract Film and Beyond. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Manovich, Lev. 2001. The Language of New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. McCann, John J. 1998. Color Theory and Color Imaging Systems: Past, Present and Future. Journal of Imaging Science and Technology 42 (1): 70–78.Google Scholar
  18. Picard, Andrea. 2007. Reading Between the Lines with Bruce McClure. CinemaScope 32. http://cinemascope.com/columns/columns-filmart-reading-between-the-lines-with-bruce-mcclure/.
  19. Pierson, Michele James, E. David, and Paul Arthur, eds. 2011. Optic Antics: The Cinema of Ken Jacobs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Sharits, Paul. 1969. Notes on Films/1966–1968. Film Culture 47 (Summer): 13–16.Google Scholar
  21. Sherwin, Guy. 2007. Optical Sound Films 1971–2007. London: Lux Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Sitney, P. Adams. 2002. Visionary Film: The American Avant-Garde 1943–2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Ströhl, Andreas, ed. 2004. Vilém Flusser: Writings. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  24. Vasulka, Steina. 1977. Paul Sharits Interview. https://vimeo.com/12607672.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Deakin UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations