Advertisement

Communicating Aircraft Structure for Solving Black-Box Loss on Ocean Crash

  • Kais Mekki
  • William Derigent
  • Eric Rondeau
  • André Thomas
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 762)

Abstract

Commercial aircrafts use black-box required for crash investigation purposes. While a black-box can be easily recovered in crash events on land, the same does not apply to crash events in great deep ocean water. This paper presents a new solution towards solving black-box data loss on ocean crash using a paradigm called communicating materials. The solution is developed through uniformly integrating hundreds of micro sensors nodes in the aircraft structure. The nodes could then construct a Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) inside the aircraft. When a crash is detected by the aircraft system, the black-box data could be stored in all nodes using data storage protocols for WSN. Since nodes are uniformly deployed in the whole aircraft structure, investigators could thus gather preliminary crash causes information from the nodes inside any floated aircraft wreckage in the ocean. This solution was evaluated using Castalia simulator in terms of reliability, storage capacity, and energy efficiency.

Keywords

Aircraft black-box Wireless sensors networks Storage protocols Clustering Systematic-Reed-Solomon 

References

  1. 1.
    Santolalla, E.V., Cortes, D.F., Gonzalez, E.M., Fernandez, E.G., Abaurrea, P.G.: Aircraft black box, US patent US8489259B26 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    French BEA: Final report on the accident on 1st june 2009 to the airbus A330–203 registered F-GZCP operated by air France flight AF 447 Rio de Janeiro—Paris (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    French BEA: Triggered transmission of flight data working group, Technical Report (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saravanan, S., Ragulkannan, R., Sreenivasaraja, N.: Intelligent method of flight data recording using satellite communication by avoiding the search of black box. Int. J. Curr. Res. Mod. Educ. 1(2), 238–241 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mekki, K., Derigent, W., Zouinhki, A., Rondeau, E., Thomas, A., Abdelkrim, M.N.: USEE: a uniform data dissemination and energy efficient protocol for communicating materials. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 56, 651–663 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kubler, S., Derigent, W., Thomas, A., Rondeau, E.: Method for embedding context-sensitive information on communicating textiles via fuzzy AHP. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 26, 597–610 (2014)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jover, J., Thomas, A., Leban, J.M., Canet, D.: Interest of new communicating material paradigm: an attempt in wood industry. J. Phys. 416(1), 12–31 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peña, R., Krommenacker, N., Charpentier, P.: A new strategy for dimensional metrology using smart dust networks. In: International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vujić, D.: Wireless sensor networks applications in aircraft structural health monitoring. Appl. Eng. 13, 79–86 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    American Federal Aviation Administration (FAA): Revisions to cockpit voice recorder and digital flight data recorder regulations, Technical Report (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    French BEA: Flight data recorder read-out: technical and regulatory aspects, Study Report (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tunca, C., Isik, S., Donmez, M., Ersoy, C.: Distributed mobile sink routing for wireless sensor networks: a survey. IEEE Surv. Tutorials 16(2), 887–897 (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mekki, K., Derigent, W., Zouinkhi, A., Rondeau, E., Thomas, A., Abdelkrim, M.N.: Non-localized and localized data storage in large-scale communicating materials: probabilistic and hop-counter approaches. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 44, 243–257 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang, J.-H., Yu, Y., Naemeka, M.C.: Data storage algorithms based on clustering in wireless sensor networks. J. Netw. 8(8), 1796–1802 (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jaichandran, R., Irudhayaraj, A., Raja, J.: Effective strategies and optimal solutions for hotspot problem in wireless sensor networks. In: 10th IEEE International Conference on Information Sciences Signal Processing and their Applications, pp. 389–392 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xin, Y., Zhang, R.: An energy-efficient mobile sink routing algorithm for wireless sensor networks. In: 7th IEEE Conference on Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, pp. 1–4 (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maria, G., Guidoni, D., Viana, A.C.: A distributed data storage protocol for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks with mobile sinks. Ad Hoc Netw. 11, 1588–1602 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sheng, B., Li, Q., Mao, W.: Data storage placement in sensor networks. In: 7th ACM Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing, pp. 344–355 (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kim, S., Fonseca, R., Culler, D.: Reliable transfer on wireless sensor networks. In: 1st IEEE Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, pp. 449–459 (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Awami, L., Hassanein, H.: Energy efficient data survivability for WSNs via decentralized erasure codes. In: 37th IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks, pp. 577–584 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kais Mekki
    • 1
  • William Derigent
    • 1
  • Eric Rondeau
    • 1
  • André Thomas
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Centre for Automatic Control of NancyCNRS UMR 7039Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations