Advertisement

Fields and Conjunctures: The Thick Opportunity Structure of the Mobilizations

  • Nils C. Kumkar
Chapter
Part of the Critical Political Theory and Radical Practice book series (CPTRP)

Abstract

Reinterpreting Bourdieu’s theory of social fields for the study of protests, Kumkar analyzes the ‘thick opportunity structures’ in which the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street unfolded. He shows that those protests have to be understood as emerging from the conjuncture of developments in the USA’ political, economic, and journalistic fields, the crises of which spanned the social space for the protests to develop. The Tea Party, albeit being driven by authentic discontent, remained ultimately bound to the support of actors in the political and economic fields. Occupy Wall Street showed early signs of unfolding in and developing an autonomous realm of practices. However, it was not able to institutionalize this realm of practices in a manner that could render the protests sustainable.

Bibliography

  1. Abramowitz, Alan. 2011. Partisan Polarization and the Rise of the Tea Party Movement. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Seattle, Washington. http://faculty.washington.edu/jwilker/353/AbramowitzTea.pdf. Accessed 31 Oct 2017.
  2. Baccaro, Lucio, Robert Boyer, Colin Crouch, Marino Regini, Paul Marginson, Richard Hyman, Rebecca Gumbrell-McCormick, and Ruth Milkman. 2010. Labour and the Global Financial Crisis. Socio-Economic Review 8 (2): 341–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Binelli, Mark. 2012. The Battle for the Soul of Occupy Wall Street. Rolling Stone, June 21. http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-battle-for-the-soul-of-occupy-wall-street-20120621. Accessed 31 Oct 2017.
  4. Blow, Charles. 2009. Whither the Republicans? New York Times, January 31. http://blow.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/31/whither-the-republicans/. Accessed 31 Oct 2017.
  5. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1974. Der Habitus als Vermittlung zwischen Struktur und Praxis. In Zur Soziologie der symbolischen Formen, 125–158. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 1979. Entwurf einer Theorie der Praxis auf der ethnologischen Grundlage der kabylischen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 1987. Sozialer Sinn: Kritik der theoretischen Vernunft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 1988. Homo Academicus. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 1993. Über einige Eigenschaften von Feldern. In Soziologische Fragen, 107–114. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 1994. Die feinen Unterschiede: Kritik der gesellschaftlichen Urteilskraft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2008. Die Regeln der Kunst: Genese und Struktur des literarischen Feldes. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2010. Sociologists of Belief and Beliefs of Sociologists. Nordic Journal of Religion and Society 23: 1–7.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2013. Die politische Repräsentation. Elemente einer Theorie des politischen Feldes. In Politik, 43–96. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  14. Bourdieu, Pierre, and Loïc J.D. Wacquant. 1996. Die Ziele der reflexiven Soziologie: Chicago-Seminar, Winter 1987. In Reflexive Anthropologie, 95–249. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  15. Burghart, Devin. 2012. View from the Top: Report on Six National Tea Party Organizations. In Steep. The Precipitous Rise of the Tea Party, ed. Lawrence Rosenthal and Christine Trost, 67–97. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carr, David. 2009. Cable Wars Are Killing Objectivity. The New York Times, April 20. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/20/business/media/20carr.html. Accessed 31 Oct 2017.
  17. Cooper, Michael, and Megan Thee-Brenan. 2011. Public Views Congress as Top Culprit in Debt Debate, Poll Finds. The New York Times, August 4. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/05/us/politics/05poll.html. Accessed 31 Oct 2017.
  18. Crossley, Nick. 2003. From Reproduction to Transformation. Social Movement Fields and the Radical Habitus. Theory, Culture & Society 20 (6): 43–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Downie, James. 2011. The Decline of Glenn Beck. The New Republic, March 3. http://www.newrepublic.com/article/politics/84662/the-decline-glenn-beck. Accessed 31 Oct 2017.
  20. “Flirting With Fascism”. 2009. FoxNews.com. April 2. http://www.foxnews.com/story/2009/04/02/flirting-with-fascism. Accessed 31 Oct 2017.
  21. Gilcher-Holtey, Ingrid. 2001. ‘Kritische Ereignisse’ und ‘Kritischer Moment’. Pierre Bourdieus Modell der Vermittlung von Ereignis und Struktur. In Struktur Und Ereignis, ed. Andreas Suter and Manfred Hettling, 120–137. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  22. Gitlin, Todd. 2011. The Left Declares Its Independence. The New York Times, October 8. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/09/opinion/sunday/occupy-wall-street-and-the-tea-party.html. Accessed 31 Oct 2017.
  23. Graeber, David. 2013. The Democracy Project: A History, a Crisis, a Movement. New York: Spiegel and Grau.Google Scholar
  24. Holmes, Marisa. 2012. The Center Cannot Hold. In We Are Many: Reflections on Movement Strategy from Occupation to Liberation, ed. Kate Kathib, Margaret killjoy, and Mike McGuire. Oakland/Edinburgh: AK Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hood, M.V., Quentin Kidd, and Irwin L. Morris. 2015. Tea Leaves and Southern Politics: Explaining Tea Party Support in the Region. Social Science Quarterly 96 (4): 923–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. INCITE!, ed. 2009. The Revolution Will Not Be Funded: Beyond the Non-profit Industrial Complex. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kleinfield, N. R., and Cara Buckley. 2011. Wall Street Occupiers, Protesting Till Whenever. The New York Times, September 30. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/01/nyregion/wall-street-occupiers-protesting-till-whenever.html. Accessed 31 Oct 2017.
  28. Krugman, Paul. 2009. The Obama Gap. The New York Times, January 9. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/09/opinion/09krugman.html. Accessed 31 Oct 2017.
  29. Kumkar, Nils C. 2014. Events of Emancipation and Spectacles of Discontent. How the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street ‘Happened.’. In Protests as Events. Politics, Activism and Leisure, ed. Lamond R. Ian and Karl Spracklen, 211–231. London/New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  30. Lo, Clarence Y.H. 2012. Astroturf versus Grass Roots: Scenes from Early Tea Party Mobilization. In Steep. The Precipitous Rise of the Tea Party, 98–129. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mayrl, Damon. 2013. Fields, Logics, and Social Movements: Prison Abolition and the Social Justice Field. Sociological Inquiry 83 (2): 286–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McGirr, Lisa. 2002. Suburban Warriors: The Origins of the New American Right. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  33. McInerney, Melissa, Jennifer M. Mellor, and Lauren Hersch Nicholas. 2013. Recession Depression: Mental Health Effects of the 2008 Stock Market Crash. Journal of Health Economics 32 (6): 1090–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Milkman, Ruth, Stephanie Luce, and Penny Lewis. 2013. Changing the Subject: A Bottom-Up Account of Occupy Wall Street in New York City. New York: Joseph S. Murphy Institute for Worker Education and Labor Studies. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/562862-changing-the-subject-2.html. Accessed 30 Oct 2017.
  35. New York Times. 2010. Polling the Tea Party. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/04/14/us/politics/20100414-tea-party-poll-graphic.html. Accessed 31 Oct 2017.
  36. NYCGA. 2011. Statement of Autonomy Passed by the General Assembly at Occupy Wall Street. November 10, 2011 and Passed Revision by the General Assembly at Occupy Wall Street, March 3, 2012. http://www.occupywallstreet.net/policy/statement-autonomy. Accessed 31 Oct 2017.
  37. NYT/CBS. 2009. The New York Times/CBS News Poll, January 11–15. http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/politics/poll_results.pdf. Accessed 31 Oct 2017.
  38. Owen, James. 2013. Occupy’s Precarious Pluralism: A Study of the Purposes, Identities and Politics Enabled by the NYC Occupy Movement. New York. http://occupywallstreet.net/sites/default/files/ows_-_occupys_precarious_pluralism_report_final.pdf. Accessed 31 Oct 2017.
  39. Post, Charlie. 2014. The Future of the Republican Party. Jacobin. https://www.jacobinmag.com/2014/12/republican-party-tea-party/. Accessed 31 Oct 2017.
  40. Ramin, Mojtabai, and Mark Olfson. 2014. National Trends in Long-Term Use of Antidepressant Medications: Results from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 75 (2): 169–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Reuters. 2011. Glenn Beck and Fox News End Daily TV Show, April 6. http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/04/06/us-glennbeck-idUSTRE73560N20110406. Accessed 31 Oct 2017.
  42. Rohr, Benjamin. 2015. Nestling into Pieces of Social Structure: Organization and Mobilization in the Case of the Tea Party. Master Thesis, Mannheim: Universität Mannheim.Google Scholar
  43. Schneider, Nathan. 2013. Thank You, Anarchy: Notes From the Occupy Apocalypse. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  44. Sitrin, Marina, and Dario Azzellini. 2012. Occupying Language: The Secret Rendezvous with History and the Present. New York: Zuccotti Park Press.Google Scholar
  45. Skocpol, Theda, and Vanessa Williamson. 2012. The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smelser, Neil J. 1967. Theory of Collective Behavior. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  47. Smith, Neil. 1996. The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Solty, Ingar. 2013. The Crisis Interregnum: Considerations on the Political Articulation of the Global Crisis. From the New Right-Wing Populism to the Occupy Movement. Studies in Political Economy 91: 85–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. ———. 2014. Die Tea Party Als Klassenprojekt. Neoliberale Religiösität in Den USA. Luxemburg 2014 (2): 52–59.Google Scholar
  50. Steinberg, Jacques. 2007. Cable Channel Nods to Ratings and Leans Left. The New York Times, November 6. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/06/business/media/06msnb.html. Accessed 31 Oct 2017.
  51. Stelter, Brian, and Bill Carter. 2009. Fox News’s Mad, Apocalyptic, Tearful Rising Star. The New York Times, March 30. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/30/business/media/30beck.html. Accessed 31 Oct 2017.
  52. Taylor, Blair. 2013. Long Shadows of the New Left: From Students for a Democratic Society to Occupy Wall Street. In Revisiting the Sixties: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on America’s Longest Decade, ed. Laura Bieger and Christian Lammert, 77–93. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
  53. The Economist. 2011a. Not Again. The Economist, June 13. http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2011/06/americas-jobless-recovery. Accessed 31 Oct 2017.
  54. ———. 2011b. The Jobless Young: Left behind, September. http://www.economist.com/node/21528614. Accessed 31 Oct 2017.
  55. Tilly, Chris. 2011. An Opportunity Not Taken... Yet: U.S. Labor and the Current Economic Crisis. WorkingUSA 14 (1): 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Trost, Christine, and Lawrence Rosenthal. 2012. Introduction: The Rise of the Tea Party. In Steep. The Precipitous Rise of the Tea Party, 1–22. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  57. Vitale, Alex S. 2005. From Negotiated Management to Command and Control: How the New York Police Department Polices Protests. Policing and Society 15 (3): 283–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vitale, Alex. 2014. The Rise of Command and Control Protest Policing in New York. In The New York City Police Department: The Impact of Its Policies and Practices, ed. John A. Eterno and Eli Silverman. New York: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  59. Waisbren, Harry. 2012. From Wisconsin to Wall Street: A Cheesehead Does Not Stand Alone. In From Cairo to Wall Street: Voices From the Global Spring, ed. Anya Schiffrin and Eamon Kircher-Allan, 180–188. New York: New York Press.Google Scholar
  60. Williamson, Vanessa, Theda Skocpol, and John Coggin. 2011. The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. Perspectives on Politics 9 (1): 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nils C. Kumkar
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BremenBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations