The Structural Crisis and the Emerging Patterns of Class Conflict

Part of the Critical Political Theory and Radical Practice book series (CPTRP)


Kumkar offers a Regulation Approach inspired understanding of the Great Recession as an escalation of the structural crisis of the finance-dominated accumulation regime—a crisis which could only be solved by a transition to a new regime of accumulation. The conflict between factions of capital about this transformation, which Kumkar shows to also have left its mark on the polarizing presidential election of 2008, however, did not lead to structural transformation but rather to an interregnum of “austerity by gridlock”. The timing and thematic focus of the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street can be understood through the dynamics of this interregnum and especially the conflict between factions of capital that functioned as a resonance body for the protests.


  1. Acemoglu, Daron, David Autor, David Dorn, Gordon H. Hanson, and Brendan Price. 2014. Return of the Solow Paradox? IT, Productivity, and Employment in U.S. Manufacturing. Working Paper 19837. National Bureau of Economic Research. Accessed 29 Oct 2017.
  2. Aglietta, Michel. 2000. A Theory of Capitalist Regulation. The US Experience. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. Althusser, Louis. 1969. On the Materialist Dialectic. In For Marx, 161–218. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Altvater, Elmar. 2008. Die Finanzkrise – mehr als ein Weltmarktsungewitter. Das Argument 278: 490–504.Google Scholar
  5. Barker, Colin. 2013. Class Struggle and Social Movements. In Marxism and Social Movements, ed. Colin Barker, Laurence Cox, John Krinsky, and Alf Gunvald Nilsen, 39–61. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  6. Bauman, Zygmunt. 2012. Times of interregnum. Ethics & Global Politics, Nr. 5 (1): 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Becker, Joachim. 2013. Regulationstheorie: Ursprünge und Entwicklungstendenzen. In Fit für die Krise? Perspektiven der Regulationstheorie, ed. Roland Atzmüller, Joachim Becker, Ulrich Brand, Lukas Oberndorfer, Vanessa Redak, and Thomas Sablowski, 24–56. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
  8. Boyer, Robert. 2000. Is a Finance-Led Growth Regime a Viable Alternative to Fordism? A Preliminary Analysis. Economy and Society 29 (1): 111–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brenner, Robert. 2006. The Economics of Global Turbulence. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  10. Brenner, Neil, Jamie Peck, and Nik Theodore. 2010. After Neoliberalization? Globalizations 7 (3): 327–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bundestag, Deutscher. 2002. Schlussbericht der Enquete Kommission ’Globalisierung der Weltwirtschaft – Herausforderungen und Antworten. Drucksache 14/9200. Bonn: Deutscher Bundestag, 14. Wahlperiode. Accessed 29 Oct 2017.
  12. Candeias, Mario. 2011. Interregnum – Molekulare Verdichtung und organische Krise. In VielfachKrise Im finanzmarktdominierten Kapitalismus, ed. Alex Demirović, Julia Dück, Florian Becker, and Pauline Bader, 45–61. Hamburg: VSA.Google Scholar
  13. Catte, Pietro, Pietro Cova, Patrizio Pagano, and Ignazio Visco. 2011. The Role of Macroeconomic Policies in the Global Crisis. Journal of Policy Modeling 33 (6): 787–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cox, Laurence, and Cristina Flesher Fominaya. 2013. European Social Movements and Social Theory: A Richer Narrative? In Understanding European Movements: New Social Movements. Global Justice Struggles, Anti-Austerity Protests, ed. Cristina Flesher Fominaya and Laurence Cox, 7–29. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. De Vroey, Michel. 1984. A Regulation Approach Interpretation of Contemporary Crisis. Capital & Class 8 (2): 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Demirović, Alex, and Thomas Sablowski. 2013. Finanzmarktdominierte Akkumulation und die Krise in Europa. In Fit für die Krise? Perspektiven der Regulationstheorie, ed. Roland Atzmüller, Joachim Becker, Ulrich Brand, Lukas Oberndorfer, Vanessa Redak, and Thomas Sablowski, 187–238. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
  17. Foster, John Bellamy, and Fred Magdoff. 2009. The Great Financial Crisis: Causes and Consequences. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  18. Foster, James E., and Michael C. Wolfson. 2009. Polarization and the Decline of the Middle Class: Canada and the U.S. The Journal of Economic Inequality 8 (2): 247–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Friedman, Thomas L. 2008. Green the Bailout. The New York Times, September 28. Accessed 29 Oct 2017.
  20. Glyn, Andrew, Alan Hughes, Alan Liepietz, and Ajit Singh. 1988. The Rise and Fall of the Golden Age. 43. WIDER Working Papers. Helsinki: World Institute for Development Economics Research of the United Nations University. Accessed 29 Oct 2010.
  21. Goldenberg, Suzanne. 2009. Obama Focuses on Development of Green Economy in Speech Before Joint Session of Congress. The Guardian, February 25. Accessed 20 Nov 2017.
  22. Gramsci, Antonio. 1991. 3. Heft. In 2.-3. Heft, ed. Wolfgang Fritz Haug, vol. 2, 327–448. Gefängnishefte. Hamburg: Argument.Google Scholar
  23. Harvey, David. 2007. The Limits to Capital. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 2009. The ‘New’ Imperialism: Accumulation by Dispossession. Socialist Register 40.Google Scholar
  25. Haug, Wolfgang Fritz. 2008. Editorial I: Die Krise denken. Das Argument 278: 483–489.Google Scholar
  26. Hirsch, Joachim, and Roland Roth. 1986. Das neue Gesicht des Kapitalismus. Hamburg: VSA.Google Scholar
  27. Hoffmann, Catherine. 2015. Ein großer Irrtum., May 31. Accessed 29 Oct 2017.
  28. Javers, Eamon. 2009. Inside Obama’s Bank CEOs Meeting. POLITICO, April 3. Accessed 29 Oct 2017.
  29. Jessop, Bob. 2001a. Introduction. In Regulationist Perspectives on Fordism and Post-Fordism, ed. Bob Jessop, vol. 3, xxv–xliii. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  30. ———. 2001b. Series Preface. In The Parisian Regulation School, vol. 1, ix–xxiii. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  31. ———. 2014. Capitalist Diversity and Variety: Variegation, the World Market, Compossibility and Ecological Dominance. Capital & Class 38 (1): 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krugman, Paul. 2009. Tea Parties Forever. The New York Times, April 13. Accessed 29 Oct 2017.
  33. ———. 2010. Building a Green Economy. New York Times, October 4. Accessed 29 Oct 2017.
  34. ———. 2011. The Competition Myth. The New York Times, January 23. Accessed 29 Oct 2017.
  35. Lapavitsas, Costas. 2013. Profiting Without Producing: How Finance Exploits Us All. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  36. Lipietz, Alain. 1998. Kette, Schuss und Regulation: ein Werkzeug für die Sozialwissenschaften. In Nach dem Ende des ’Goldenen Zeitalters. Regulation und Transformation kapitalistischer Gesellschaften, ed. Hans-Peter Krebs, vol. 255, 77–115. Berlin: Argument.Google Scholar
  37. Lo, Clarence Y.H. 2012. Astroturf Versus Grass Roots: Scenes from Early Tea Party Mobilization. In Steep. The Precipitous Rise of the Tea Party, ed. Christine Trost and Lawrence Rosenthal, 98–129. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marx, Karl. 1974. Das Kapital. Vol. 3, MEW 25. Berlin: Dietz.Google Scholar
  39. Mayer, Margit, and Roland Roth. 1995. New Social Movements and the Transformation to Post-Fordist Society. In Cultural Politics and Social Movements, ed. Marcy Darnovsky, Barbara Epstein, and Richard Flacks, 299–319. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  40. McNally, David. 2009. Von der Finanzkrise zur Weltwirtschaftskrise (2. Teil). Das Argument 281: 471–478.Google Scholar
  41. New York Times. 2008. National Exit Polls Table. Accessed 29 Oct 2017.
  42. OECD. 2011. Towards Green Growth: A Summary for Policy Makers. Accessed 29 Oct 2017.
  43. ———. 2014. Income Inequality. In Society at a Glance 2014: OECD Social Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 2009a. Bundlers, Barack Obama. Accessed 29 Oct 2017.
  45. ———. 2009b. Bundlers, John McCain. Accessed 29 Oct 2017.
  46. ———. 2013a. Democratic Party, Top Industries 2010 Cycle. Accessed 29 Oct 2017.
  47. ———. 2013b. Presidential Candidate Comparison: Sector Totals, 2008 Cycle. Accessed 29 Oct 2017.
  48. ———. 2013c. Presidential Candidates: Contributions by Sector, 2012 Cycle. Accessed 29 Oct 2017.
  49. ———. 2013d. Presidential Candidates: Selected Industry Totals, 2008 Cycle. Accessed 29 Oct 2017.
  50. ———. 2013e. Republican Party, Top Industries 2010 Cycle. Accessed 29 Oct 2017.
  51. ———. 2013f. Top Contributors to Barack Obama, 2008 Cycle. Accessed 29 Oct 2017.
  52. ———. 2013g. Top Contributors to John McCain, 2008 Cycle. Accessed 29 Oct 2017.
  53. ———. 2015. Top Industries/Interest Groups 2014 Overview. Accessed 29 Oct 2017.
  54. Panitch, Leo, and Sam Gindin. 2010. Capitalist Crisis and the Crisis This Time. In The Crisis This Time, ed. Leo Panitch, Greg Albo, and Vivek Chibber, 1–20. London/New York/Halifax: Merlin Press.Google Scholar
  55. Pew Research Center. 2008. Inside Obama’s Sweeping Victory. Accessed 29 Oct 2017.
  56. Piven, Frances Fox, and Richard A. Cloward. 1979. Poor People’s Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  57. Polak, Ben, and Peter K. Schott. 2012. America’s Hidden Austerity Program. New York Times Blogs. Economix: Explaining the Science of Everyday Life (blog). Accessed 29 Oct 2017.
  58. Radice, Hugo. 2010. Confronting the Crisis: A Class Analysis. In The Crisis This Time, ed. Leo Panitch, Greg Albo, and Vivek Chibber, 21–43. London/New York/Halifax: Merlin Press.Google Scholar
  59. Rattner, Steven. 2014. Inequality, Unbelievably, Gets Worse. The New York Times, November 16. Accessed 29 Oct 2017.
  60. Reinhart, Carmen M., and Kenneth S. Rogoff. 2008. Is the 2007 U.S. Sub-Prime Financial Crisis So Different? An International Historical Comparison. Working Paper 13761. National Bureau of Economic Research. Accessed 29 Oct 2017.
  61. Rich, Frank. 2010. The Billionaires Bankrolling the Tea Party. The New York Times, August 28, Accessed 29 Oct 2017.
  62. Roth, Roland, and Dieter Rucht. 2008. Einleitung. In Die sozialen Bewegungen in Deutschland seit 1945: Ein Handbuch, 9–36. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
  63. Röttger, Bernd. 2009. Krisen des Kapitalismus – historische Perspektiven. Das Argument 283: 758–766.Google Scholar
  64. Sablowski, Thomas. 2011. Die jüngste Weltwirtschaftskrise und die Krisentheorien. In VielfachKrise Im finanzmarktdominierten Kapitalismus, ed. Alex Demirovic, Julia Dück, Florian Becker, and Pauline Bader, 29–44. Hamburg: VSA.Google Scholar
  65. Sablowski, Thomas, and Sabah Alnasseri. 2001. Auf dem Weg zu einem finanzgetriebenen Akkumulationsregime? In Ein neuer Kapitalismus? ed. Mario Candeias and Frank Deppe, 131–149. Hamburg: VSA.Google Scholar
  66. Silver, Beverly J., and Giovanni Arrighi. 2011. Das Ende des langen 20. Jahrhunderts. In VielfachKrise Im finanzmarktdominierten Kapitalismus, ed. Alex Demirovic, Julia Dück, Florian Becker, and Pauline Bader, 211–228. Hamburg: VSA.Google Scholar
  67. Skocpol, Theda. 1980. Political Response to Capitalist Crisis: Neo-Marxist Theories of the State and the Case of the New Deal. Politics & Society 10 (2): 155–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Solow, Robert M. 1997. We’d Better Watch Out: Review of Cohen, Stephen S. and Zysman, John: Manufacturing Matters, New York 1997. New York Times Book Review, December 7.Google Scholar
  69. Solty, Ingar. 2013a. Einleitung: Die Innen-Außen-Dialektik des American Empire in der globalen Krise. In Die USA unter Obama: Charismatische Herrschaft, soziale Bewegungen und imperiale Politik in der globalen Krise, 15–71. Hamburg: Argument.Google Scholar
  70. ———. 2013b. The Crisis Interregnum: Considerations on the Political Articulation of the Global Crisis. From the New Right-Wing Populism to the Occupy Movement. Studies in Political Economy 91: 85–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stockhammer, Engelbert. 2000. Financialization and the Slowdown of Accumulation. Working Papers Series: Growth and Employment in Europe: Sustainability and Competitiveness. Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien. Accessed 29 Oct 2017.
  72. Stockhammer, Engelbert. 2007. Some Stylized Facts on the Finance-Dominated Accumulation Regime (Workingpaper Series). Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachussettes, Amherst.Google Scholar
  73. Tankersley, Jim. 2013. Jobless Recoveries Are Here to Stay, Economists Say, but It’s a Mystery Why. The Washington Post, September 19. Accessed 29 Oct 2017.
  74. Teixeira, Ruy. 2010. Demographic Change and the Future of the Parties. Accessed 29 Oct 2017.
  75. The Economist. 2015. An Incorrect Dial? The Economist, August 5. Accessed 29 Oct 2017.
  76. UNEP. 2011. Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication. A Synthesis for Policy Makers. Accessed 29 Oct 2017.
  77. Wallerstein, Immanuel. 2010. Structural Crises. New Left Review 62: 133–142.Google Scholar
  78. Williamson, Vanessa. 2013. The Tea Party and the Shift to‚ Austerity by Gridlock’ in the United States. Accessed 29 Oct 2017.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BremenBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations