Skip to main content

It’s the Economy, Stupid: Coverage of the British EU Referendum in Norway

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1037 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter analyses the coverage in three Norwegian daily newspapers and the online service of the Norwegian public service broadcasting company NRK during the 20 days before and 10 days after the British EU referendum in 2016. The study finds that there were four competing frames in the coverage, two about the outcome of a possible leave vote (negative effects and not particularly negative effects) and two about the reasons for a leave vote: a reaction to social and economic inequality or a reaction to immigration. The negative effects frame was the most salient frame, and it also turned out that a fair share of both effects frames was about economic issues, including long-term and more short-term reactions of the financial markets. Economic issues were however not given the same attention when it came to the situation of the unemployed or ‘working poor’, as the immigration question to an extent overshadowed other messages from ‘ordinary’ interviewees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

Academic Sources

  • Bastiansen, H.G. 2009. Lojaliteten som brast. Partipressen i Norge fra senit til fall 1945–2000. Pressehistoriske skrifter, No. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjerke, P., B.K. Fonn, and E.S. Strømme (eds.). 2016. Økonomijournalistikk. Perspektiver og metoder. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjørklund, T. 1982. Mot strømmen. Kampen mot EF 1961–1972. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. 1995. Distinksjonen. En sosiologisk kritikk av dømmekraften. Oslo: Pax.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eide, E., and A.H. Simonsen. 2008. Verden skapes hjemmefra. Oslo: Unipub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entman, R. 1993. Framing. Towards Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, G.A. 2005. Financialization and the World Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenssen, A.T., and H. Valen (eds.). 1995. Brussel midt imot. Oslo: Ad Notam Gyldendal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjær, P., and T. Slaatta (eds.). 2007. Mediating Business. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 1997. Republicanism. A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokkan, S. 1967. Geography, Religion and Social Class. Crosscutting Cleavages in Norwegian Politics. In Party Systems and Voter Alignments, ed. S.M. Lipset and S. Rokkan, 367–444. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

News Sources

  • Aartun, Jorun Sofie F. 2016. Sweet and Sour EU Scepticism. Dagens Næringsliv, June 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ånestad, Morten. 2016a. Brexit Scares Brussels. Dagens Næringsliv, June 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ånestad, Morten. 2016b. Change of Citizenship Sought. Dagens Næringsliv, June 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. 2016. The Shock. Klassekampen/Front page, June 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Åsnes, Alexander. 2016. This Can Be the Beginning of a World-Wide Crisis. NRK, June 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Erik. 2016. Fears for World Growth Rates. Dagens Næringsliv, June 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Erik, and Bente Bjørndal. 2016. Confidence in Good Times Ahead in London. Dagens Næringsliv, June 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brekke, Ingrid. 2016. Fears for the Consequences of Brexit. Aftenposten, June 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buanes, Frode. 2016. Ready for a New Scottish Liberation Struggle. Dagens Næringsliv, June 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buanes, Frode, Tore Gjerstad, and Morten Ånestad. 2016. Major Bank Warns Against Major Downturn. Dagens Næringsliv, June 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekeberg, Emilie. 2016. The World Seen from the Bank. Klassekampen, June 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sættem, Johan B. (2016). ‘Fears for a More Nationalistic Europe’. NRK, June 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sættem, Johan B., and Lilla Søhusvik. 2016. Brexit Can Result in a Weakened World. NRK, June 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, Hallvard. 2016. Belief that Cox Killing Will Keep the Country in the EU/Notice. NRK, June 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilseth, Trond Ola. 2016. Skogen’s “Cold Shower”. Klassekampen, June 18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Birgitte Kjos Fonn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fonn, B.K. (2018). It’s the Economy, Stupid: Coverage of the British EU Referendum in Norway. In: Ridge-Newman, A., León-Solís, F., O'Donnell, H. (eds) Reporting the Road to Brexit. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73682-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics