Abstract
Realizing proper ways of organizing is based on the foundation for creating enterprises, which is formed by the enterprise governance competence discussed in the previous chapter and the theories, methodology, and methods of enterprise engineering, which are the topics of this chapter. After summarizing enterprise challenges and resuming the need for holistic, enterprise-wide design, the theoretical basis for the enterprise engineering design science is presented. For avoiding theoretical incompleteness, the enterprise conceptual model introduced in Chap. 2 is taken as the reference for the necessary enterprise-wide perspective, whereby an enterprise is viewed as a system. Based on the system perspective and the fundamental function-construction distinction, our outline of the enterprise engineering design science starts with explaining the essence of a system function as a relationship with the system environment and construction as a system property. The profound implications of this distinction for functional and constructional design are explained and illustrated. Various other concepts for design are introduced, such as functional and constructional decomposition into functional and constructional design domains. These domains are essential for defining functional and constructional requirements and architecture. The difference between these concepts is explained. Through the schematic of the generic requirements and architecture framework, the design concepts are expressed with respect to their mutual relationships. Subsequently, the schematics of the generic system development framework and the generic system development process illustrate the practice of system development.
Having discussed the concepts for design from the general system development perspective, these concepts are in turn applied to the design of enterprises. After explaining the notion of a ‘model’ and discussing the concept of essential construction models, the theory of essential enterprise modeling is outlined as the starting point for enterprise design. Subsequently, further enterprise functional and constructional design is discussed. As in the general system case, enterprise functional and constructional decomposition into enterprise functional and constructional design domains is essential for defining enterprise functional and constructional requirements and architecture. Special attention is paid to the publication of requirements and architecture as an important aspect of enterprise governance. Various examples of enterprise requirements and enterprise architecture are provided, and their role in creating coherent and consistent enterprise-wide design is stressed as a critical condition for enterprise operational and strategic performance. In view of the complexity of enterprises, which also includes concepts like behavior and culture, the important distinction between direct and indirect design, and their relationship, is explained. All design concepts and their mutual relationships are expressed by the schematic of the enterprise requirements and architecture framework and the generic enterprise development framework, as well as positioned against the phases of enterprise realization discussed in Chap. 3. Finally, the implications of the poietical foundation for enterprise governance and enterprise engineering are summarized.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adler, P.: Corporate scandals: it’s time for reflection in business schools. Acad. Manag. Exec. 16(3), 148–149 (2002)
Apostel, L.: Towards the formal study of models in the non-formal sciences. Synthese. 12(2/3), 125–161 (1960)
Barrett, F.J., Fry, R.E.: Appreciative Inquiry. Taos Institute Publications, Chagrin Falls (2005)
Beer, M., Finnström, M., Schrader, D.: Why leadership training fails—and what to do about it. Harv. Bus. Rev. 94(10), 50–57 (2016)
Bryan, L.L., Joyce, C.I.: Better strategy through organizational design. McKinsey Q. 2, 21–29 (2007)
Burns, D.: Systematic Action Research. Policy, Bristol (2007)
Caluwé, L. de, Vermaak, H.: Leren veranderen. Samson, Alphen aan den Rijn (2000)
Chemero, A.: An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecol. Psychol. 15(2), 181–195 (2003)
Ciborra, C. (ed.): From Control to Drift. The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)
Creswell, J.W.: Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1994)
Dietz, J.L.G.: The atoms, molecules and fibers of organizations. Data Knowl. Eng. 47, 301–325 (2003)
Dietz, J.L.G.: Enterprise Ontology. Springer, Berlin (2006)
Dietz, J.L.G.: Architecture, Building Strategy into Design. Academic Service, The Hague (2008)
Dietz, J.L.G., Hoogervorst, J.A.P.: Enterprise ontology and enterprise architecture—how to let them evolve into effective complementary notions. GEAO J. Enterprise Architect. 2(1), 3–20 (2007)
Dietz, J.L.G., Hoogervorst, J.A.P.: A critical investigation of TOGAF—based on the enterprise engineering theory and practice. In: Albani, A., Dietz, J.L.G., Verelst, J. (eds.) Advances in Enterprise Engineering V, pp. 76–90. Springer, Berlin (2011)
Dietz, J.L.G., Hoogervorst, J.A.P.: The principles of enterprise engineering. In: Albani, A., Aveiro, D., Barjis, J. (eds.) Advances in Enterprise Engineering VI, pp. 15–30. Springer, Berlin (2012)
Dietz, J.L.G., Hoogervorst, J.A.P.: The discipline of enterprise engineering. Int. J. Organ. Des. Eng. 3(1), 86–114 (2013)
Espejo, R., Reyes, A.: Organizational Systems. Springer, Berlin (2011)
Foroohar, R.: Driven of the road by MBA’s. Time, July 18, 2011
Ghoshal, S.: Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ. 4(1), 75–91 (2005)
Gibson, J.J.: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1979)
Hammer, M., Champy, J.: Reengineering the Corporation. Nicholas Brealey, London (1993)
Hall, J., Healy, K.A., Ross, R.G.: The Business Motivation Model. Business Rules Group (2005)
Halpin, T., Morgan, T.: Information Modeling and Relational Databases. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2008)
Hayes, R.H., Abernathy W.A.: Managing our way to economic decline. Harv. Bus. Rev. July-August 2007, pp. 138–149
Hoogervorst, J.A.P.: Enterprise architecture: enabling integration, agility and change. J. Cooper. Inform. Syst. 13(3), 213–233 (2004a)
Hoogervorst, J.A.P.: Enterprise Engineering en -architectuur: een antwoord op falende strategie-implementaties. Holland Manag. Rev. 98, 20–31 (2004b)
Hoogervorst, J.A.P.: The imperative for employee-centric organizing and its significance for enterprise engineering. Organ. Des. Enterprise Eng. 1(1), 43–58 (2017)
Hoogervorst, J.A.P.: Foundations of Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering—Presenting the Employee-Centric Theory of Organization. Springer, Berlin (2018)
Hoogervorst, J.A.P., Dietz, J.L.G.: Kernbegrippen omtrent Enterprise Architectuur en Architectureren. Tiem, Tijdschrift voor Informatie en Management. 10, 40–48 (2005)
IEEE: Std 1471: Recommended Practices for Architecture Descriptions for Software Systems. IEEE Computer Society, New York (2000)
Jackson, M.C.: Systems Thinking. Wiley, Chichester (2003)
Johansson, H.J., McHugh, P., Pendlebury, A.J., Wheeler, W.A.: Business Process Reengineering. Wiley, Chichester (1993)
Khurana, R.: From Higher Aims to Hired Hands. The Social Transformation of American Business Schools and the Unfulfilled Promise of Management as a Profession. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2007)
Kuhn, T.S.: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago University Press, Chicago (1962)
Lammers, C.J.: Organisaties vergelijkenderwijs. Spectrum, Utrecht (1987)
Lindström, A.: On the syntax and semantics of architecture principles. In: Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1–10 (2006)
Lutz, B.: Car Guys vs. Bean Counters. The Battle for the Soul of American Business. Penguin, New York (2011)
Mannaert, H., Verelst, J., de Bruyn, P.: Normalized Systems Theory. Koppa, Kermt (2016)
Martin, J.: The Great Transition. Using the Seven Principles of Enterprise Engineering to Align People, Technology and, Strategy. American Management Association, New York (1995)
Morgan, G.: Images of Organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2006)
Nadler, D.A., Tushman, M.L.: Competing by Design: The Power of Organizational Architecture. Oxford University Press, New York (1997)
Nagel, E.: The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London (1961)
Perks, C., Beveridge, T.: Guide to Enterprise IT Architecture. Springer, New York (2003)
Recker, J.: Scientific Research in Information Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Rothenberg, J.: The nature of modeling. In: Widman, L.E., Lopardo, K.A., Nielson, N.R. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence, Simulation, and Modeling. Wiley, New York (1989)
Simon, H.A.: The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge (1969)
Simon, H.A.: Administrative Behavior. Free, New York, 1947, 4th edn (1997)
Thomas, A.B.: Controversies in Management. Routledge, Abingdon (2003)
Urwick, L.: The Elements of Administration. Pitman, London (1947)
Winograd, T.: A language/action perspective on the design of cooperative work. Hum. Comput. Interact. 3(1), 3–20 (1988)
Winograd, T., Flores, F.: Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1987)
Wooldridge, A.: Masters of Management. HarperCollins, New York (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hoogervorst, J.A.P. (2018). Poietical Foundation. In: Practicing Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering. The Enterprise Engineering Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73658-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73658-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73657-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73658-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)